$20,000 link

With PDS2 (open banking initiative) regulations coming near the banks will have to open up their APIs and let fintech companies make use of people's funds, effectively ending their monopoly on the control of people's money.
So banks are bro right? Not so.
What can they do if they want to remain in control and create another monopoly?? Enter chainlink.

A big topic in sibos was innovation and interoperability. After all nobody wants to go the way of blockbuster for their lack of innovation and complacency.
How can swift and banks create a monopoly if they are being forced to open up their customers data? Use chainlink of course.
You grab the necessary resources to run a part of the network (link tokens) and start running nodes so that companies that want to make use of the data have to go through your node and pay you fees in link effectively hogging up the API market.

Now why is chainlink being kept lowkey?
If you have a new technology that creates profit while at the same time helps you create a monopoly of course you won't want your adversary companies to know you have this technology.

If mcap of crypto keeps rising (and even if not) and chainlink is the infrastructure used by most blockchain trustless smart contracts this project could hog 10% or more of the total mcap.
And when you know staking is profitable and a lot of link are staked in nodes this could drive the available supply down to 100 million tokens more or less.

Feel free to discuss and ask questions. I had to rewrite this shit for you guys.

I think crypto mcap could get to 20 trillion eventually before crashing to a more objective value of the technology.
10% of 20 trillion= 2 trillion

If most people stake their tokens and only sell their profits (theorized 3%) the available link would be only 30 million (but I base my calculation on around 100 million to be more conservative).

So (2 trillion/100 million tokens) = $20,000 per link.

$20,000 per link I think is the maximum price it will reach before crashing down.

LOL
The delusion
Meanwhile it was 1000 + trading volume for months
Then shot right to 100 followed by 40-50 BTC volume
The worst on binance

Low trading volume can be good, but for a short period of time. When it stays there and has no signs of pumping, that means it is close to dying.

You may be intelligent in some ways, but your delusion is like a cloud over your head. I am dumping my insurance stack because i now know what kind of absolute morons i was dealing with when reading the shills.

It's ok, you're free to sell if you believe in other projects.
Bitcoin, Ethereum and Monero are also good.

>What can they do if they want to remain in control and create another monopoly?? Enter chainlink.
so chainlink is the real jewish kike maximalist coin?

This is such a make or break moment for LINK. If customers are using private blockchains to test (which doesn’t make sense) then it doesn’t add credence to the magnitude of interest in the project. So then, what the fuck! This project, and probably crypto, is fucking dead for a good long time. There’s nothing beyond dragging more speculators into the fold that can get us to pump. Projects like LINK won’t enhance the fundamentals of the scene like ETH did.

You are cool I like the math. It could get to $20k per link eventually, but it likely will stall at $1k.
You think we go all in on link? That's insanity. I have a large stack b/c the memes and use case are good. No sweat if it fails though.

The problem is i deal with Link shill threads every fucking day. And i ignore many of them, but at a certain point the delusion pisses me off. It has no real basis, just hopes and wishes.

Please user, at least diversify.... keep a stinky stack if you want. Do not hedge your bets on this coin ever being a performer. Most likely when no one has been fomo'ing into Link during past events, updates, conferences.... they won't all the sudden now during 'main net'

I am confident on this, save your self and open your eyes ffs.

I repeat: Biz said link would be $10 after SIBOS. Assblaster said $3 by May. The whale larper said $1000 EOY (all in the archives)

No one is in any rush to buy Link except biz, not now not ever... including institutions. (they would be sold otc from Sergey)

The thing is, I don't think non-staked tokens should be used as the denominator to calculate market cap, since everyone should be comparing the price of a link token to the income they get from holding it.

The tokens staked aren't really "locked up'. They can be sold if the market price goes high enough.

So I prefer to use the total supply of 1 billion tokens in my calculations.

At $2 trillion, we'd see link at $2000 per token.

This board doesn’t deserve this insight, SWIFT is taking full advantage of this tech considering Ripple is a competitor.

Op needs to gas himself fast. This is truly fake, and GAY. There is nothing realistic about 20k LINK especially when it is not even on coinbase. 20k LTC or ETH this year is more likely. Linkies in denile.

that’s not how market cap works you silly.

it makes no difference how many tokens are ‘locked up’ or ‘circulating’, if there are a billion tokens out there and the price is $20k then that is equivalent to the token holders collectively believing that they are storing $20T of value. because any of them could in principle liquidate any part of their holdings, that market cap is only sustainable if buyers similarly believe there is $20T of value inherent in the system.

please stop saying dumb shit about supply.

Seems like a win-win to me. I think Swift is betting on the project to transition from a centralized fee money monopoly to a decentralized open data semi-monopoly (because you need other node operators for the network to grow and make it secure).

Times are changing fast, technology is going to win. You either adapt or die.

faith in humanity restored.

yet chainlink shills get into a ripple threads and claim its bankster coin, centralized shit, jewish trick to get bitcoins, scam etcetera

>If customers are using private blockchains to test (which doesn’t make sense) then it doesn’t add credence to the magnitude of interest in the project.

I think customers need to set up their systems to work with ropsten before doing the real deal to save time and debug. Remember ropsten doesn't have the consensus protocol yet (data aggregation from the nodes) and it's only open so developers know how it will work and how to incorporate it to their projects.

stop overthinking it and lets go up $1 at a time. i'll be happy if link can break $3 this year.

$15 in 2019
$100 in 2020

Bitcoin isnt even 20,000 and theres only 21m coins lol wtf

This test, and probably crypto, is fucking pointless for a top notch broadened stretch of time. there might be nothing past dragging more noteworthy scholars into the cover that could spur us to pump. undertakings like association won't redesign the nuts and bolts of the scene like eth did.

Market cap is literally a meme. It's calculated by multiplying the circulating supply by the price. If 95% of Link tokens are locked up by node operators, it creates scarcity, thus driving up the price

ah B THinkIn CryptO Mcap Cud GiT Ta 2000 TrazaZillIOn evenTUalLee Befo' CrAshInnn Taa uHHH Mo'' objeCtiZzle vaLUe o'' Tha TEchNoloGy.
10% O' 20 TriLlion=== 2 tRilliOn

if MostT plaYass $takee DEayy Tokens N' Onlii PuSh deAyy profIts (theorizEdd 3%) tha AvAilaBlE LInkk WuD B ONLi 300 mazazillion (but Ahhh Baseeee Mahh calculasHun Awn RouN' 100 Mazazillion Ta B Mo'' COnservAtIve).

So (2 triLliOn/1000 MAzAzillIOnn Tokens) = $20,0000 PuH Link.

$20,000 Puh linK Ahhhh BB ThInkin Iz thA MaxImum pRIceeee IT Will REach befO' CrasHin DOwn.

Attached: nogg.jpg (332x393, 16K)

Quads of truth

Seven burgundy tomatoes smashed the piano with no Zanzibar left to escape the submarines.

I only invest in infrastructure and privacy coins (currently 100% in chainlink).
Remember that the first years of the internet were won by infrastructure projects. The same way people build stuff on Ethereum. The same way people will incorporate off chain data into blockchain making use of chainlink.

I do not know of any other infrastructure project with more support and upside potential than link.

If you know one please let me know so I can look into it.

If this were true I'd only be worth a hair under 100mil instead of a hair under a billy =[[

Did you just accidentally type out your metamask seed words senpai?

Nexus, Sky, Holochain

What privacy coins do you like? I like btcp but its a piece of shit. Zcash is interesting but not surr if therell be more price action

I agree with this philosophy and that’s why I am all in on ChainLink and Tezos (the first smart contract platform worth writing end-to-end decentralised smart contracts on with the level of security that ChainLink offers).

I like skycoin, if someone could decentralize the internet it could be a huge game changer.
I do not know if they will be able to deliver though.

As for the other two projects I will research them.
However chainlink has been working with big companies for a long time and has big support. Also I believe the sheer broad use cases of the project could put it head to head to crypto titans like Ethereum.

This

Guys, shut the FUD up.

If half of those partnerships are real, then you're a stupid nigger for not having any Link. kys faggot.

I like monero and zcash.
Remember than in the end it all comes down to the network effect. There will be one or two projects that will hoard some specific areas.
Currencies (Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash???)
Privacy (Monero, Zcash)
Oracles (Link, Mobius???)
Dapps (Req, wysker???)

A voice of reason. Speculation is fun, but anyone's guess to what the price will be is as good as any until mainnet is launched, and we can finally see the people/organizations using Link in the real world.

it was over your head rebecca just stop posting

Look guys

Attached: 20180605_205656.png (1440x2432, 2.24M)

Sounds good. My thinking is that BTC will surprise casuals and eat absolutely everyone's dinner with LN, privacy coins might survive because BTC privacy development is going v slowly.
ETH will remain no 2 because, as you said, network effect and battle testedness.
LINK is my moonshot, I believe in the project 100%, but it's so unlikely that it would have gone unnoticed this long I have to believe there's some big flaw that I'm missing.

another street shitting pajeet phone posting from the shitting streets.

Shut the fuck up idiot your opinions are worthless.

finally bought 1600 link in suicide insurance

prey for me

pajeet confirmed!

This. 1000 by 2022 the year of dubs

LINK will replace USD as reserve currency by eoy

Screen cap this.

Attached: 1495092279930.jpg (1840x1549, 426K)

Idk when this "Rebecca" shit became a thing but its strangely hilarious...its always in LINK breads

get the fuck out right now

you tried to get the quints but you failed; chainlink is a dead meme

Attached: apu-f.jpg (657x635, 42K)

Double zeros dubs; yes this is because chainlink is in the void; dead.

All this needs is some MY FUCKING FEELINGS WHEN and it will be perfect

Of course you wouldn't know, dumb bitch.

There is zero confirmation that chainlink is currently working with any considerable entity

working with deez nutz, check em

Attached: as above1b.jpg (550x693, 139K)

>With PDS2 (open banking initiative) regulations coming near the banks will have to open up their APIs and let fintech companies make use of people's funds, effectively ending their monopoly on the control of people's money.

if this was true in impact then shorting banks would be the way to go, not link

shut up beccy

Attached: 1505632266466.jpg (800x1200, 260K)

$1000 EOY

Can't argue with the digits.

>I think chainlink could get to $20,000 dollars
Good for you

Attached: LINK-queen.jpg (736x351, 121K)

Just let them dream. They'll wake up in 4 years and realize the pipe dream they were sold was nothing but hot air. For now it gives them a reason to live and hope which is really all they are seeking out of life in the first place.

keked

Delusion the post

Absolutely retarded

Attached: 1525535137272.jpg (250x238, 8K)

With bitcoin for example the market cap includes mined and lost coins.

If you take market cap seriously you are more delusional than link holders.
>muh low caps
I wouldn't be surprised if we get to a point where market cap just isn't a viable tool for measuring the worth of a token.

Ripple doesn't have any utility to it. It's just used to transfer value.

Also it's not just link shills who hates Ripple.
Everyone knows it's the Kike coin.

>Projecting this hard

You don't think it's possible that someone holds a decent pervebt of link among 20 other coins. They bought because the tech sounds interesting and the memes are funny. They want to see it succeed but won't lose much if it turns out to be a scam. But that seems highly unlikely.

You are just a faggot.

Wow! 20k buys a LOT of big macs

Justifies response with " not even on coinbase"
I feel sorry for biz sometimes

Dfinity

these numbers are getting close to this and that other iceberg pic

Attached: how big is chainlink.jpg (1050x800, 300K)