Nolinkers why?

Basically three major red flags:

Excessive bagholder expectations + lack of an actual product + 32 million USD ICO

>sergey's role as ceo is update his investors. Well he knew what the fuck an ico was and knew the coins could change hands...well if you hold link you are an investor in chainlink..its sergey's responsibility to update...unless he wants the sec up his ass for frauding investors.
Sergey's role as CEO is to run a successful company with successful products and services.
The people who bought the tokens are not investors, they are buyers of an asset which grants you access to the chainlink network. This COULD give you profits if you put in the work and run a node. Buying the tokens don't guarantee profits on itself, that's why the token isn't a security.
>When Dimitri is still gone at end of june you will better understand..i heard from multiple people he is back at loop and tie.
Rory confirmed is temporary, if Rory says anything I'll gladly accept that you're right.
>Rory is leaving..you forgot that part...see rory manages a few communities, check out tap project or aurora idex telegram and you will see rory quite a bit...actually rory spends way more time in that community. He is leaving full time to idex because they got so big...
Still false, Rory is involved in some other communities as most other crypto enthusiasts but noting full time.
>Its public perception and you have oraclize established, corda with working oracles and actual projects, now iota with partners announcing they will go live in 3 weeks, zap on testnet...and chainlink silent. even testnet silent
At least we can dispel the FUD that nobody needs oracles when other companies are trying to build their owns.
>The activity you are talkking about is link faucet transfers. If you look at actual data requests there are none except for thomas and johnny.
I'm talking about the events (The requests for data). Not the link token transactions.

>Basically three major red flags:
>Excessive bagholder expectations
Why is this a red flag?
>lack of an actual product
They are working on the product, you can check the pivotal tracker and github.
>32 million USD ICO
Why is this a red flag?

fucking BASED

>Paying for API data
Why would you do that when you can get it for free

WARNING MARINES
A discord crew is fuddin LINK up in preparation fo' a pump n' dump. They hope nuff will push so they fomo back up in n' loot they pumped bags. First, they ask fo' LINK memes all dem minutes ago ''Oh Jow Forums help, I lost mah meme folda n' all mah LINK memes is gone'' n' then they start a heavy FUD campaign. I aint talkin' bout chicken n' gravy biatch. In tha next few minutes or weeks, they will pump n' dump LINK.
WARNING OVER

Some are free, some aren’t.

Why would customers trust data that you fetched yourself?
How would you fetch data in a completely trustless way?
Is it easier to code an oracle for your multi-million dollar smart contracts or use a centralized oracle that can be hacked and has downtime than to use a plug n' play decentralized oracle that has no downtime and pays you a penalty if you get bad data instead of suing?

>What's your reason?
i don't care
it's just an other shitcoin out of hundreds

Have you researched it?