Communism can work!

Go clean your room, gommie.

I do. That's when most countries of the world saw the most economic growth. The great depression was literally caused by Socialist Policies.

Yes.

According to dialectical materialism, socialism will one day replace capitalism, and from there go to communism. So you better hope you are long dead by the time that happens :^)

I'm planning to move to Venezuela, I don't know too much about it, wpuld it be nice?

it's a socialist utopia, i hear

Capitalism has been here since all of history. Literally trading. Communism is new, Capitalism has been here forever.

then everyone starves to death, bravo

And that's a good thing, right?

given two choices? that or a commie paradise like cuba or north korea? what would you choose?

Capitalism is not just trading you dumb fuck

Attached: brainletbike.jpg (326x294, 12K)

Yeah and don't forget to point out you mean REAL socialism and REAL communism, whatever that means. But definitely nobody has seen that in practice.

>fascism is the only solution

Attached: Nun_Amen-Ra.jpg (512x512, 68K)

>communism can twerk!

Attached: PicsArt_11-29-10.31.09.jpg (1440x1446, 98K)

>The great depression was literally caused by Socialist Policies.

Attached: 1529010005021.png (811x628, 93K)

>commie ideology is just made for being cuba or north korea!

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 41K)

Real intellectual americans hours

Show me the proof it wasn't.

The USSR, Vietnam, Cuba, and many other countries had real socialism. They just didn't manage to reach communism. That's a retarded no true scotsman used by leftcoms and ultralefts

>Modes of production are ideological systems that are implemented consciously and not phenomenons emergent from human society
Your dumb post is like saying "Darwinism can work" or even "Romanticism can work"
Marxism is not prescriptive it is descriptive

How will the state wither?

t. commie

Get off my site commie.

Wojaks and frogs are fucking cancer

t. redditor

>commie ideology is awesome in theory
>cuba and north korea are just a bad example!
>a-a-and btw they didn't have communism!

Attached: r1zr3jm86ba11[1].jpg (550x543, 36K)

Communism isn't an ideology

It's a mental illness.

Cuba and the DPRK were socialist but not anymore. Is that seriously so hard for amerilards to understand?

This

Communism is cringe
t. Republica Moldova

What's with americans and slave mentality?

what are they now? capitalist?

communists btfo epic style

Once a Commie country, always a commie country, till they get rid of the commie government entirely. Once Cuba stop praises that Traitor to Cuba "Castro" as some sort of Hero, and North Korea removes all their commie symbols, then I'll accept them as non-commie.

>why don't americans want to live in a dictatorship? fucking slaves

Communism is for slaves through.

what is it? an economic system only tried in societies with a certain ideology?

>capitalism is awesome because it can privatize all the public areas of the world and freely attack the 3rd world without ethical value judgment

Attached: 8nRqoXW.png (800x729, 48K)

Communism is the subjection of production to mankind rather than vice versa
Thus it is the ultimate level of human freedom

Attached: this.jpg (552x358, 22K)

If communism and socialism is great why do Venezuelans are moving to another country? They are selfish and don't like to share their things?

You don't 'try' economic systems.
No council of people sat down and said 'let's try capitalism'
Same for socialism

I would say they're both countries with state-planning and some market elements. They also both have profit motives, which is something that socialism doesn't have. In the USSR for example bussinesses didn't operate for profit, simply to serve society.

Attached: rbac.jpg (400x558, 96K)

Ils ne savent pas qu'ils sont des esclaves car de la maladie mentale

what is your definition of a business? isn't it something to do with private property? they didn't have private property in the ussr, every enterprise was owned and run by the state. so they had no "profit" but only on paper. in reality their system was based on a state capitalism model, i.e the accumulation of capital via the surplus value that was extracted from the workers and that surplus was re-invested and re-distributed among the ruling elites. so it was indeed production for profit not production for use. it was just a corrupt form of state capitalism (a state directed accumulation).