Did they fight for FREEDOM?

Did they fight for freedom and humanity in WWI?

Attached: 3392859898_3a78d3da67_z.jpg (500x311, 79K)

Attached: 6227ab4f361d7950f990d5b68d22b1c3-460x293.jpg (460x293, 67K)

the reddit aliance

Yes
The in ww2 too
But in cold war the good guys lost

Attached: 1543484663717.jpg (480x360, 29K)

>Great War
Good guys won
>WW2
Bad guys won
>Cold War
Both sides were slaves of Israel (bad guys)

No, of course not.
But neither did the axis, they each fought for their own interests.
This is literally propaganda 101.

>finnish intellectuals

Japan fought for freedom from gaijins but lost. And became slave for this moment.

>Japan fought for freedom from gaijins
That's what I would call self interest.

Imagine being called Servia.....................

This post brought to you by a fucking leaf

>won WW1
>lost WW2
>winning side of cold war
>Jews fear the samurai

Japan confirmed best cunt in world

War was inevitable at that time in Europe. Niall Ferguson does an interesting counter history and argues Britain should've allowed Germany a quick victory in WW1 instead of getting involved. Millions of lives would have been saved, there would be no ww2, (possibly) no bolshevik revolution and hence no cold War. The world would be completely different but lol no we fought because George wanted to bitchslap the Kaiser

No. Wars are never fought for freedom, the opposite exact

Was there ever any doubt?

Japan got nuked, and tsunam;d and radioactive'd. Do something with your country behavior. Or else...

>Japan
Win against China in 1895
Win against Russia in 1905
Win against Germany in Asian side of WW1
Lose against America in WW2

3 wins and 1 lose. So it's OK.

Based.

>if you kill your enemy, he wins

It doesn't matter how much you win if you lose everything in one war.

>Lose against America in WW2
Add Soviet Union in your list. haha loser.

Attached: lolsadnips.jpg (640x405, 107K)

>Win against Germany in Asian side of WW1
What was there to win?
The half starved Coconut Cult of August Engelhardt?

Allow me to redpill you on WW1:

All the major countries on both sides were imperialist and therefore bad guys. In general, the Allies were slightly less bad. In particular, Germany was slightly badder. The Ottomans had no business in that war and were absolute scumbags. Austria was responsible for the initial conflict (Germany is culpable for enabling their idiocy), but Russia made its escalation inevitable. The right side won. It's regrettable that this led to WW2, but it could have been avoided even with Allied victory in place.

There was the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact at the time.
And Soviet Union joined WW2 in the east side after America nuked.

Why God allowed this to happen?

>woot there are good and bad sides in war! fuck moral ambiguity fuck yeah my dudes killed your dude omg war so based! liberators!!!!!!

Attached: 1526045633591.jpg (960x492, 56K)

Japan fought to the end after getting nuked. So Yeah Soviet Union and USA double teabagged rising sun flag. Teabagged lol

That's called a war or company.

>no USA

Attached: 1538293513471.gif (540x310, 463K)

That's because you fought for Israel not freedom

>Israel existed before 1948 and wasn't exclusively a creation of the Eternal Anglo (C and TM all rights reserved)

Attached: 1515506607766.png (625x773, 143K)

I like Japan, still.

Of course a Finn would say Nazis are the good guys.

None fight for freedom. Or at least this is what some of the soldiers thought. All this mess began from the death of a single person and the murderer wasn't working for any nation

We probably would have if the bastards didn't insist on invading Belgium for no reason at all.

Considering we fought krauts, we definitely fought inhumanity

>kill belgian civilians
>start massive use of combat gas
>start using flamethrowers

>burgers shows up with shotguns

>wtf stop that's against the rules!!!

The eternal kraut

>turn up late and do almost nothing
You might as well ask why Italy isn't there.

Based burgers teaching krauts a lesson

>pretends to be a civilised nation
>refers to signed treaties as "scraps of paper" to be ignored at will