Which capital has the worst placement?

t. Capitalet cope

Shouldn’t the capitol be equidistant from all areas?

BUTTapest

Attached: 1450491046836.jpg (4940x3740, 1.57M)

>capitol
That's a building you severely mentally retarded subhuman fuck
The word you're looking for is capital

real distance is time not kilometers

t. centralist shithole

Did you know that Americans measure distance in time in their daily lives?
We say our job is a 30 minute drive away instead of saying 15 miles

Attached: ummm.png (1106x1012, 728K)

A lot
For example Santiago here was built because it had a river (Mapocho), hills for defense (Huelen, now called Santa Lucía), good climate (Mediterranean) and lots of arable land nearby

our capital used to be in the middle of the country but now it's right next to sweden

Attached: 7I5K9su.png (599x801, 709K)

HAHHAHAHAHAHA

gets me everytime

Sweden's capital also used to be in the middle of the country, then Russia BTFO them

Washington D.C was built on a shitty swamp solely because we didn't want it to be politically biased on wherever it was located

OP said the worst placement. Learn to read, stupid amerigoblin.

>let's build our capital city nobody's ever heard of in the middle of the amazon for no reason instead of in a real city like sao paulo or rio de janeiro

what were they thinking bros?

Attached: mbrazil.gif (505x521, 37K)

Autistic beaner

that's the Cerrado

That's because they wanted to reafirm control over the Amazon area

thats not the amazon

Attached: 1513098642896.jpg (600x600, 57K)

>knowing anything about brazil's geography

*snap*

Budapest best placement!

Attached: Austro_Hungary_1000.jpg (940x731, 284K)

thats so fucking hard to remember, right?

Attached: amazon.jpg (505x521, 115K)

Does anyone know about Australia's geography more than a super desert island?

>let's build our capital city nobody's ever heard of in the middle of the outback for no reason instead of a real city like Sydney or Melbourne.

it's more an austrian than slovak city

Attached: landkarte-slowakei.png (625x321, 55K)

chicago should be the capital of usa
sydney in australia
sao paolo in brazil
montreal in canada
istanbul in turkey

Aarhus should be capital of Denmark

>chicago should be the capital of usa
Opinion discarded.

>>chicago should be the capital of usa
>Opinion discarded.
stfu retard
you have no idea what you are talking about

a capital needs to be within the country

why? it's a big city located inside the country far away from foreign enemies

>a capital needs to be within the country
it is

Attached: aarhus central.png (835x823, 189K)

we don't claim j*tland

Attached: ss.png (1420x1383, 826K)

>he claims sweden

even then your capital would be Slagelse

It has been for 6 years, from 1865 to 1871

Everyone does that

Historically - Philadelphia
Geographically - Denver would be a fine capital city

Washington DC is a good example of a shithole.

There are two main reasons why one would ever consider moving the US capital in 2018
>properly addressing the new urban/rural divide
>getting away from all the niggers infesting DC
Chicago as the capital would only make things worse and not solve anything. The point about being easier to defend is completely moot because USA is literally impossible to invade and it isn't even true anyway because Chicago is closer to any international border than DC is.
America is a big country with multiple centres of power and economic development and multiple regional subcultures. Any new capital is basically guaranteed to make over half of the country butthurt so might as well stick with what has worked for over two centuries.

The way to solve the regional issue would be to put the capital in 3 cities. Each city hosting a branch of government.
1. Washington DC would keep the executive branch because of existing infrastructure.
2. Chicago for the Legislative branch.
3. Dallas for the Judicial branch

This would make sense hypothetically.

sounds like a pain in the ass to keep the branches far from each other

way bigger than that

now this makes absolutely zero sense
probably bait

Brazil's jungles used to extend all the way to the beach line

>Having a bridge that connects your capital to malmo
RIP denmark

Same, O*Lo is an embarrasment for the rest of the country

Guiné is rightfull Portuguese clay , like all of Africa.

Montréal was the capital, Ottawa was chosen because it has a fairly even bilingual split and it is in a defencible position.

Cqpital should be accessible to people. I guess the average man in your corrupt system has no say.

i hate retards like you
chicago would have the PERFECT location to be the capital of the USA
do you understand??
or are you RETARDED??? did your disgusting gypsy whore mother unbirth you after she shat you out to suffocate you in her rotting womb to suffocate you and kills your braincells??

this was made to protect politicians from protest acts and revolutions, capital far away from populated centers are a paradise to govern

Slovakia and countries like it.
Imagine your coutry being so SHIT that the capital looks like wants to be in the neighbouring country.

You don't know what you're talking about. Chicago is on the great lakes, near the Canadian (then British) border. It's not a good idea to build your capital near your one historic enemy. It was also home to Indians that were allied with Britain and hostile toward Americans, which is why a fort built there was the sight of a massacre after falling to Chief Blackbird and the Potawatomi during the War of 1812. It wasn't finally well settled by Americans until the better part of a century after D.C. was created.
They created D.C. specifically because they did not want a particular city like New York, Boston, or Philadelphia, or a particular state, to be the seat of power as it might give them preferential treatment or at least the appearance of superiority.

Oslo has been our capital the longest though, and at least it still has it's norse name and not the l*tin version like Trondheim does.

Washington DC literally surrounded by mutts

B*Rlin

This is what makes it so bad, that strategy its Africa tier. Rio would be a better choice imo

Berlin is sad. Half destroyed churches, holocaust memorials everywhere, junkies,and fucking currywurst lmao. The only part that I liked was Museumsinsel

It's safe from hinterland nogs.

Imagine having a capitol right next to p*land

They could just put the parliament and ministeries in a city other than the capital

Sofia was chosen because of its central location to "muh rightful clay", but then we ended up with a stupid capital on one side of the country surrounded by stupid mountains.

Attached: 1280px-Bulgaria-geographic_map-en.svg.png (1280x846, 1.01M)

>Helsinki
Dead end peninsula. Idiotic.

Attached: Uusimaa.png (1080x1329, 541K)

i vote for bratislava

Except it's not the amazon, retard.

Attached: file.png (800x531, 808K)

Washington DC became pretty shitty once the country got the rest of the continent.

In geographical placement why not St. Louis or Kansas City instead

Still does, but it's "mata atlantica"

>in the middle of the amazon
user..

Jesus you're dumb

how about two capital cities right next to each other?

Attached: congo.png (800x727, 140K)

side note: capitals of CAR and Burundi right on the border with DRC

Bratislava and Vienna are the saddest
Countries that have their capital on a side because the rest is all desert/snow/thundra etc aren't as bad as those two

What? So meetings between branches would have to take place a thousand miles from each place? The branches are heavily interconnected, not satellites operating independently of each other.

>there's not a single bridge between the two
What kind of 5D chess are Congolese leaders on

advanced african brains. we cannot comprehend their ways