The migration of peoples is the most important question facing the international community today

And to answer OP's question. I think 95% of the foreigners don't bring anything positive to our society.

Controllled migration,no make a stupid "lottery system".

I think racial differences are real but technology is sufficiently advanced and society is sufficiently robust to survive a drop in average IQ. Sure, crime will go up, quality of life for the proles will stagnate somewhat and the government will have to increase oppressive surveillance measures to keep everybody in line.

But I think it's a preferable option to letting populist retards run all the European countries into the ground and making Europe a global backwater again as it splinters into small nations fighting over some villages that got put on the wrong side of some border in some treaty 500 years ago. I also think that technocratic secular humanist elites are preferable to cronyist mafiosos who inevitably seize control of any right wing government.

That must be the most Jewish post ever posted during the existence of internet.

Imagine damage controlling so desperately you become delusional

brown man bad

Attached: serveimage.png (259x195, 7K)

t. Misha that has been seething all his life since Janis gave him a beating

I unironically wish I was Jewish. They've got a nice team gig going on. I'm stuck with my shitty useless middle class Latvian acquaintance network. Funny thing is, when Latvians go abroad they start behaving an awful lot like Jews, forming cliques and getting jobs for each other. Too bad there's so few of us and most of us are so stupid.

MENA scum are not welcome. You will not get disco money, the prime minister will not give his house to you.

I believe people are inherently unequal and there's nothing wrong with that.

Funny that you should accuse me of being Russian, considering that it's Russians who are funding and supporting the populist nationalist movements in Europe. Russia benefits from a disunited and weak Europe just like China does, so they encourage anti-EU and anti-NATO movements everywhere except the Baltics where they support the Russian irredentist mongrels.

Fuck off, we're gonna fucking sink!

I'm not racist, I just don't like them. Simple.

Attached: deeuwigetatta.jpg (650x596, 183K)

>hygienetugal

Massive immigration is necessitated by the current world order.

The system needs to be destroyed for a new order (fonded on a human level) to come into being.

>I think racial differences are real
>Latvia
race is a social construct slav bud

Attached: 1447001513956.png (550x563, 287K)

We need more borders and more states

Fuck open boarders and fuck EU, nothing good will ever come out of either.

Race is a social construct. Racial differences aren't.

If you don't understand the statement above don't reply to me, mulatto.

>αλλόχθων

>The migration of peoples is the most important question facing the international community today.
no, it's just the most abused for easy votes. By both parties.

>Race is a social construct. Racial differences aren't.

>If you don't understand the statement above don't reply to me, mulatto.

Attached: 1526482672844.png (406x452, 30K)

yeah I don't think he understands

>why race matters
there exist no evolutionary pressure in the tropical region to develop better shelters, better tools, better clothes, ripe tropical fruit just falls on your head and all you have to do is be aggressive

the reason global north is richer than the global south is because populations up there had ice age glaciations and had to select for intellect, they had to save up for the winter, had to cooperate to bring down woolly mammoths and so on, they simply required more intellect to survive
>it was all muh oppression, muh collonialism, muh slavery
doesnt explain how you can put brit convicts on a resourceless desert island wasteland australia or nordics on equal deathworld iceland and they develop 1st world countries while tropical negroes with all the resources on the planet always end up with a 3rd world slum
or how when you put global north population in africa they create a bread basket, food exporting nation rhodesia and how when the UN destroyed it and let the exact same land be ran by blacks you get starving 3rd world nation zimbabwe
no geographical reason to develop higher iq = no higher iq
different geographies = different iq
iq is why nations are as they are, wealth correlates with iq, everything else is circumstancial stuff that changes all the time but iq is a base factor

Le based and le redpilled

doesn't explain why russians are iq 40 and why eskimos never build 1st world civilizations

>he doesnt even deny it

we do the same, but the 14% includes all people born here of immigrants

Yeah, it comes from Greek.

Autochtoon and allochtoon.

The statistics are pretty hard to compare this way.

In Switzerland they count Europeans as well.
And in some countries they only count first generation people. Or people with a foreign nationality.

meant for

>Do you believe in more open borders?
If walking around downtown Reykjavík with all the tourists and foreign workers is a microcosm of what open borders would be like then I'll pass

russians contributed to science and technology, arts and literature etc far more than most peoples, eskimos actually have an easy survival of simple seal hunting and fishing and such environment doesnt require too high iq

I'm going to Romania then, heard they have great internet too