EHYEK YALL GAWDLESS NEGROS AIN GAWT DA WAWLMART ROUND DESE PARTS? YALL HEARDA JESUS?

EHYEK YALL GAWDLESS NEGROS AIN GAWT DA WAWLMART ROUND DESE PARTS? YALL HEARDA JESUS?

Attached: uncontacted-tribe.jpg (800x422, 63K)

this isn't the case of contact problems, this is the case of protecting a population from infections

is it justfiied that we forget this crime because they are "innocent"

or is it justified that we protect them because their immune system is so "untainted"

thirdly the american dude broke indian rule and fare warning, so in a very technical sense they were simply standing their ground

but this doesn't mean there shouldn't be a prosecution even for formalities

Kek, those people don't even have birth certificates and don't pay taxes, why the fuck should they be prosecuted under any law? They have taken nothing from any state and therefore aren't obliged to follow any of their laws. It was 100% self defense (equivalent to somebody breaking into your house and telling you about the wonders of Allah).

So far as I'm aware, the Indian government filed a homicide case after Chau's killing, just as it did after two fishermen were killed by the Sentinelese several years back. But in practice, the tribesmen aren't prosecuted.

The Sentinelese are remnants of another era. I don't think it's moral or just to prosecute a people who live alone both by choice and as a virtue of proximity--up until tourism in the Andaman & Nicobar islands took off, their only contact was with the Jarawa and British and Indian traders. That contact rarely seems to have ended well for them.

Chau broke numerous laws and ruined numerous lives to spread MUH WORD OF CHRIST. He got killed and his friends and and accomplices were arrested as a consequence.

I'm sure he had lots of love in his heart, but there's a certain sort of arrogance that lets Christfags think things like this are okay.

If some tourist in, say, USA, DPR Korea or Russia goes to a restricted area that is surrounded by signs saying "DON'T GO THERE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES", patrolled by the army and navy to make sure nobody gets closer, known worldwide because enforcers shoot first and ask questions later, and he STILL sneaks his way to that area and gets sniped from a sentry tower, should there be a "formal prosecution"? No. It's his own fault.

the thing is if we consider the sentinelese to have rights to have their privacy it means they are capable of holding rights and thus rules and morals, even if they have no justice system, same kind of bargaining happened with the native transgression, there was some kind of morality barter
there are formal prosecutions on behalf of be aggrieved yes, it's delivered through the embassy, no matter whose "fault" it is, outright murder demands some kind of legal recourse

>speak a language nobody else speaks
>live a lifestyle nobody else lives
>get punished for enforcing the only law you've ever known

>"W-w-we must avenge B-Brother Chau for intentionally violating a series of laws intended to protect himself and the natives from needless violence! P-prosecute the Ooga Boogas for trying to defend themselves from a delusional Christfag!"

sorry but if we don't the foundation of western imperialism/legal framework was hubris

>Western imperialism was hubris

hmmm

ie, it is unjustifiable
that is the native deserve proper legal compensation

such as recognition of trail of tears as genocide

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

it was even worse, it was equivalent to someone breaking into your house AGAIN after you've asked him to leave and threatened to shoot him

the legal framework of the west considers native people a legal entity even if they do not or could not consider it legal
that is applicable to not just how american saw the natives but also how europeans saw africans, they are treated as legal bodies even if they are incapable or unknowingly subject to such legal definition, this is how the west have been able to parse land and other resources for hundreds of years

to suddenly abandon this notion of imperialism of rule because sentinelese are too few to be bothered with means that the foundations of all the land carving by the west has been all built on a lie

empirism + christianity = weak

Attached: EA263B36-BFFB-411B-9B17-3F9B89E2E7FC.jpg (666x409, 71K)

>subjugating native populations on the belief that Europeans are entitled to other men's resources is a lie

No shit.

as a matter of fact yes, it is just that we leave these people alone on their island, they didn't ask for anything

obviously but that's not the point
you see that makes sense in your feelings but it doesn't make sense in the foundation of rule of law

in order to say american law is rule you have to justify what the government does as legal, it's not that what they did to the native was wrong, it was, but that's not the point, the point is they had to legally justify it, it doesn't matter if the indians accept it all not

the same must apply here, it doesn't matter if the sentitles accept the ruling or not it doesn't matter, what matter is they must be considered as legal entities just as past transgressions did retroactively, or else american law breaks down forever

technically we can't, in a philosophical view, because all people are supposedly capable of certain fundamental things

we are just able to rationalize our laziness better if they are few, i am not saying we shouldn't leave them alone i am just saying there are fundamental paradoxes if we leave them alone, that is if they deserve to be left alone why not all the other natives who has been wronged?

>American law breaks down if foreign entities grant special concessions to a group which has no cultural parallel in the United States, Canada or Mexico

yes

t. Illiterate Eddie

historic precedence says otherwise

Nothing you've said in this thread makes any sense whatsoever. I would recommend going back to school and taking remedial English courses.

>that is if they deserve to be left alone why not all the other natives who has been wronged?
They also deserve to be left alone, just like how every country in the middle east deserves to be left alone from the united states of america

How did they survive British expacy in 19 century?

It's a tiny island with no material worth. Brits kidnapped some of them anyway because the eternal Anglo is cruel by nature.

Why are so many Christian missionaries Asians? I met a Japanese guy in college whose parents are missionaries in Africa.

Gaijinboos take everything seriously.

At least they didn't destroyed the Architecture of cities they conquered.

Attached: 1542878843042.jpg (850x425, 60K)

>it was equivalent to someone breaking into your house AGAIN
Add to that the person breaking into your house having ebola or something

They're more akin to endangered animals than anything else, legally. If a retarded amerimutt sneaks into an off limits tiger sanctuary because he wants to befriend the tigers and gets mauled, the tigers generally don't get culled.

KARA BOĞA