>The visionary creator of this revolutionary technology was too autistic and/or isolated that he believed people would do what is right against ALL of human nature as opposed to milk it for everything they possibly can
Listen, people on average still live day to day. Financially, morally, and in every other way possible. Am I supposed to believe Satoshi imagined some reality wherein people stopped being utterly worthless for even a second? He expected people to actually sacrifice and have self control?
LMAO!
If you left it up to the people (and by that I mean an average person), there would be mass starvation, chaos, death, war, etc, all in record time. Look around, people's actions speak for them. They are not to be trusted with anything at all. So you're telling me that Satoshi's intention was to 'gift' this to the people, and that they would actually do what is right with it? Do you think I'm retarded?
Even IF this was not finance based, it would have ended up just like this. But the fact is that IT IS finance based, and so there is LITERALLY ZERO chance of the people 'coming together' and doing the 'right thing', EVER. There is no fucking way it would ever happen. If you believe the people are capable of such a feat, then you are either genuinely autistic and lacking crucial analytical ability, or just sub 100 IQ.
There are probably less than 1% of people GLOBALLY who have the necessary traits, intelligence, and emotional intelligence, to understand what sacrifice means, and be WILLING to see it through. Not the word 'sacrifice' but to actually understand what it means in practice.
That is why any grand 'revolutionary' idea/movement/innovation/etc such as the 'vision' people talk about will NEVER cause such a change that the way society works changes. It will always be based on a previous version, there will never be an 'idea' that grips people in such a way so as to change EVERYTHING.
Brandon Nguyen
It was Nakomoto SAtoshi zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-12/exposed-real-creator-bitcoin-likely-nsa-one-world-currency
>Tether on brink of second billionth bailout for bitcoin.
Jeremiah Clark
you think it can't be worked out and mapped to reality?
Because despite being worshipped as some sort of god-like figure within crypto, he's actually just like every other 'billionaire' who succumbed to the numbers game that is accumulation of wealth. It's just numbers on a screen at this point, for him and everyone else. Obviously, there isn't much he can do in such a position because he can't just give it away either. So what can he do?
Well, he's either living in relative seclusion and probably not extravagantly, or he was already well off to the point he doesn't need it, and like I said, it's just a game, numbers on the screen go up and down while he lives his life anyway.
If cryptocurrency and Bitcoin in particular is definitely the future, then why would him sending every single Bitcoin in his wallets have any impact long term on Bitcoin? Obviously the price would crash, but I thought Bitcoin was the future? I thought it's only a matter of time until everyone is using it anyway?
Because he is human like anyone else and it is probably very difficult to give up such power, and just like everyone alive on Earth right now, he's corrupted just like we're all corrupted.
>Take down the banks! >Bank the unbanked! >Free the people of a life of debt and misery
It was a sales pitch all along, you idiots.
Ayden Thomas
Well what the fuck do you expect me to do about it?
Ethan King
you sound just like every other jew out there
Aaron Nelson
he was already famous
Andrew Morris
stop shitting on the streets, for starters, pajeet.
Joshua Perez
If Satoshi is so kind-hearted and well meaning with his 'vision', then he would have no problem sending me 100 BTC right now:
17DKgqDwwNtmd1DwWhHuobFmvhH1JvsSh8
I mean, it's the future right? "Free" the people? Well, I'm in need of some freedom right now. Sure, the price will dip if he sends from an old wallet.. but it's the future anyway? It will recover! So why doesn't he be a man of his word and go ahead. I am 100% serious. He's posted here before, no doubt.
Not really.
I doubt, but I bet he had some notoriety in some smaller way.
