Post what your people claim to descent from
In this part of the arab world, it is claimed that we (arabs living between Qatar peninsula and Musandam peninsula) originate from the arab Azd tribe that came from Yemen in the first century CE after the fall of the Marib Dam. In fact in arab myths, it is claimed that all arabs originate from Yemen.
So all Arabs we wuz as ancient Yemenites.
What do you we wuz as?
I'm berber and me wuz white Europeans
Italians, portuguese and niggers
we are rapebabies , so i don't have the right to talk
based Moroccan conquistador
Being a mutt is superior
Emiratis and omanis are a special case. Most of them are a hybrid of arabs, indians, zanzibaris, and iranians.
But in general yes Arabs from southern tribes originate from Yemen
Citizens of the world I guess
false. The true non meme origin of arabs is not Yemen. Arabic originates from the north Arabia/South Levant area. It first started spreading from there to more regions in the middle east from the 1st to 3rd centuries AD. And then spread to wider areas after the Arab conquest. Also the first mention of Arabs was from Assyrians that claimed to have fought them, in northern Arabia. So the Arabs are definitely not from southern Arabia or the Yemen region. That is not to mention that Yemen had it is own south Arabian languages that aren't even from the same Semitic branch as Arabic. So I don't think Arabs are from Yemen. I think Arabs originate from Northern Hejaz/Southern Levant, you know? The area where Petra and Tabuk are. Probably.
t.immigrant from a historylet country
Interesting.
Also, shouldn't Assyria rather be Iraq than Syria?
Or both. Always found that image weird.
Did Ethiopians really mix with South Arabs? I know they held that land for a time.
A lot of Austarlians tend to shy away from any irish ancestry they have, and believe they are totattly English/scottish
Italian and English.
Two civilizations that conquered a bunch of shit in a similar area and are now sad and dirty.
Not "my people" as such, but there was this short period when all kinds of grand histories for Finnish people were brought up. This one guy wrote a book where he claimed that Finnic tribes went around kickstarting just about all the major ancient cultures before ending up here.
Both Assyrians controlled a part of modern Syria and had a capital there. The old capital that was in Syria was also the last piece of Assyria to be conquered. There were also neo Assyrian states there before the Romans gobbled up the area
In latin america, we are all mutts, but my family comes from palestina, so we wuz arab. BUT the original line of my family arrived at palestina in 1200 fleeing portugal.
Being an ethnic french is racist, don't forget it
And our president says that we have no culture so it has to be true
Ancient Iberians, descendants of Atlantean Demigods.
Just couldn't help but be around iberian people I see
Yeah Assyrians originate form Mesopotamia. That image is stupid. Just ignore it.
Yeah the people on the horn of Africa do have a middle eastern admixture. You;d think it will only be from the nile valley or Yemen, but apparently they have ancient Syrian admixture.
i agree
but if we comeback some 10 years ago , people who "revived" and were proud of the european history were the LEFTISTS , before the fat autist neo-nazis started ruin it by their stupid ideologies and making everyone hate white people and their history
i find France history specially medieval very fascinating and there is nothing racist to be proud of it
looks fake af
Living in a shithole is in my genes.
Probably looked even faker when it was built 4,000 years ago. Amazing stuff.
You should restored the ancient religion too.
If I remember right, the land "Syria" was known as Aram/Aramea, it got named "Syria" after Assyria and Assyrians (Iraq), I believe named like that by Seleucians. In a way, it referred to their state.
Muslims called it Sham, idk how it became Syria today. I heard there was a confusion in the English language when Syria declared independence, because Syrian referred to Christian population, so they had to invent the term Syriac for them instead.
Today SSNP and ISIS uses that name to refer to the land still.
It's really confusing for me.
Iraq was also called Mesopotamia before when it was held by the Brits.
Assyria I believe was mostly based on northern Iraq. But also had land in Syria like you said.
I'm honestly wondering how Assyrians (nation) made it all the way to Turkey lol, same for Kurds.
I see. I wonder what is the reason for the whole "Black Semite" thing. Like, if they're legit connected to you racially and all.
I hear people saying they're either Negroids or not really, same for Nubians/people of North Sudan (of non-Arab origin).
What about Zanzibaris? Weren't they colony of Oman who are one of the few people of their faith? Didn't knew they even migrated to Asia, surprising.
Also man that restoration is really, really impressive. I've seen a lot of people complaining about Saddam's restoration projects, saying the fucked up, etc, but USaian occupation did much, much worse for buildings and artifacts in the region (not even saying about ISIS). I believe the mythical walls of Babylon were found and destroyed.
I was joking about french hypocrisy
Of course I know lots of migrants here who like this country, but people call them harkis or bounty depending of their origin, or that they will never be french
It's both leftists pro-white guilt and rightists against assimilation who are giving a bad reputation to white people in France
Do you guys know about mausoleum of Lenin relation.
Africans in the horn of Africa are not like Bantus. They aren't like us either. But they have both Semitic and Bantu mixes in them. I like to see them as their own thing. Although they are still Africans to me. Judging from the faces of Nubians, they are probably similar to the people of horn of africa but with a lot more MENA admixture than Ethiopians.
Also I am 1/16 Zanji. A lot of slaves weren't from Zanzibar but from the African great lakes region. The land beyond the Swahili coast. The main function of Zanzibar under Omani control was being a trading hub than an island of homegrown resources and slaves.
The US destroyed the region.
No. Tell me about it.
The Assyrians were there for a long time as merchants and colonists
See this. Really creepy lol.
Muslims destroyed the area. The US wouldn't be in the middle East if it wasn't for your instability and violent tendencies
The noble Pilgrims
>i believe you
That's actually pretty cool
t. supports terrorist, authoritarian totalitarian regimes and apartheid and tries to overthrow every government they don't like while looting the region and having allies that murder reformists and scientists
Everyone in the region hates you. You're an embodiment of chaos, greed and evil. Now get out of Syria.
Prove me wrong the failure of secular democracies in the 50s and 60s led to the rise of dictators and islamists. The us had nothing to do with it
>Tf
>Tp
we wuz masterrace and sheeet
Brits
There's this idea here that "they sent us their best", as opposed to cold huddled masses in the US, or convicts to Australia
The historical record of this is pretty clear. The only people who will even react are Australians who are salty about us being the favoured daughter of the motherland
When you go further West to Alberta you got a bunch of Becks and Johanssens larping as Anglo
WE WUZ ROMANS N SHIET
>larping as Anglo
How can you larp as something you are?
>the failure of secular democracies in the 50s and 60s
yes and this the problem lol , the West was behind their failure because the majority of those secular state a.k.a "pan-arabism arab nationalists" were against Israel , and the West replaced them with those islamists , and we all know who created/support ISIS without going in a debate of 10 hours
Wrong. The rise of Islamist was in the 80s was due to the failure of Arab nationalism and Saudi funding. Particularity Gamal Abdel Nasser's failure. The 50s, 60s and 70s were eras of arab nationalism not Islamism which was being cracked down upon by secularists. The US took Gamal Abdel Nasser as an enemy and did everything it could to sabotage and take him down him even though he was part of the non-aligned movement. Meanwhile the US allied with the Israel , the Saudis and their Salafists allied. Hell, you were even supporting Osama bin Laden. So what the fuck are you even talking about?
Poles, a.k.a Lechites (from the legendary founder Lech, who came to these lands with his brother Czech, and settled here) are descend from the Iranic tribe of Sarmatians that roamed the steppes nearby pre-islamic Persia. They came to Eastern Europe, conquered a bunch of local Slavs, abandoned their nomadic ways for the sake of agriculture, and eventually adopted the proto-Polish language, which in turn to this day contain words which are or possibly are of Iranic origin (pan - lord, jasna - bright, jaśnie panie - formal greeting akin to "good sir"). Basically the same thing as with the English and Normans happened here in early medieval times, or a bit earlier.
Or at least that's the excuse our nobles used to distinguish themselves from slavic peasantry.
The West side against Arabs because the sides with the ussr. Had nothing to do with the jews. And those republic's and Kingston's failed on their own. The us was focused on East Asia at the time. You guys were not in the at the time.
The us never gave Osama support we supported the other guys. Osama was self funded with money from his family. As you will remember he was born rich
And the attached nationalism was secular, seeing how it was started by a Christian
>be Harold Kowalski
>1 grandparent named Williams
>Ethnicity: English
Yeah Osama was from a rich family. He was also part of the Mujahedin in Afghanistan. In fact he was a major figure and organizer of the group. The group that the US supported in Afghanistan.
>The West side against Arabs because the sides with the ussr.
As I said we were part of the non aligned movement. But the US took arab secularist as enemies because they were socialists.
It was. It was ethnic nationalism not religious nationalism.
>people who "revived" and were proud of the european history were the LEFTISTS
You are fucking retarded. Stop fucking your close relatives and maybe you'll be able to stop having to go to France because of your country being so shit.
Actually people here claim they came just from eastern slavic tribes. But there are some ones a bit mad who claims that ukrainians came from God, halfgods, population of Atlantis, the true aryans, ancient egyptians etc.
>spain ffs ...
we wuz...vikangz and the founder of russia?
In the Netherlands we always talk about the 'Bataven' which were some Germanic tribe inhabiting our country before written times.
Rurik.
I've asked one Polish guy living in Holland where Dutch came from, he pointed at some Germanic tribe, lemme find it.
Is this why there was a Batavian Republic?
We are descendants of Genghis Khan.
Mujahedin isn't a group but a title.
I know but I am referring to the Afghan Mujahedin
The USSR was destroying the Mujahideen groups with attack choppers until the US gave them stinger missile systems
And there were many different mujahedin groups and we didn't fund Osama's
OH FUCK, I get what you mean now.
True. Modern Islamism started in 1979 because of multiple reasons including the soviet invasion of afghanistan and the siege in mecca