Why are turks and tatars so bad at war?

Commonwealth-ottoman worth is literally just poles and their friends winning, even with 1 vs 1000 people. Is this just made up or were they THAT bad?

Attached: battle-of-hodow-part-of-the-polish-ottoman-war-1683-1699-11-4365006.png (500x311, 91K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Moscow_(1382)
youtube.com/watch?v=mY--4-vzY6E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War

Don't diss others if you suck at it yourself

Polish sources? Really.

It's not that bad like with tatars and ottomans, dumb turk

Russia won that war.

Look at the third rhodos siege. 10k real men last 8 month against 100k roaches on an isolated island.
They suck too much

At the same time: how could someone suck so hard and have such a large empire? Their loss is true, but when you have numbers like 1 vs 10000, that is certainly made up.

Russians at war always feel they won if they didmt lose a million guys

Infinite numbers and later on, eternal Anglo and eternal Baguette acting as its guarantors. What happened any time they didnt support that abomination can be observed during Greek war for independence.
Also, consider the fact that large part of their empire was lands inhabited by inbred arabs or outright desert.

But if they have infinite numbers, how could they ahve lost against 1 person with 100-1000 warriors? I know you dislike turks, but how is that even possible? Not just turks, there are many examples like that, which is probably made up.