The Britbongs do it again

theregister.co.uk/2018/12/12/age_verification_smut_guidance_approved/

Attached: ock8078ywho01.jpg (941x515, 33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theregister.co.uk/2018/12/12/age_verification_smut_guidance_approved/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Attached: IMG_20181213_135006.jpg (611x248, 32K)

Holy fuck what a shithole.

just keeping the peace

ironic

Attached: REIC1pT.png (880x832, 726K)

By the way how true is it that they need a license to watch TV?

Attached: 1544805022349.gif (187x155, 2.28M)

ironic

its true, licence is just what its called though its just a tax on people who watch tv for the BBC

yeah lol there is a tv licence
its not always required and technically you never have to pay it if you dont want to

My god. So much for being "first world".

Attached: ed-lover-cmonson.jpg (534x400, 28K)

We have one too and you have to pay it

Why is the entirety of Europe so retarded? What the fuck is wrong with you?

It's usually because their publicly funded programs aren't tax funded. Like here in the US PBS is funded by taxes, but in a bunch of countries people without televisions bitched enough about that for their governments to only charge television owners. I'm pretty sure all the proceeds go to those public channels too.

What is so bad about a TV licence?
Its only for watching terrestrial TV, you dont need one if you only use your TV for netflix, TV is for dumb goyim anyway

Its better than what most countries do and FORCE you to pay for state television directy or indirectly via general taxation, like you do for Canal Once

ironic

Alan Moore was right.

It pays for the BBC, aka the best network on the planet

ah yes cartelland, do tell us more about how first world you are

>theregister.co.uk/2018/12/12/age_verification_smut_guidance_approved/
>that source
Okay mate.

>omg tv licence wtfffff??????
Quite possibly the dumbest meme in existence.

Maybe if your country wasn't so dumb we wouldn't have dumb memes about you.

>tf
>tp

Attached: 154567736734.jpg (400x300, 55K)

>Like here in the US PBS is funded by taxes
They get a lot of viewer donations otherwise they would just carry cheap crap.

>mexico

>It pays for the BBC, aka the best network on the planet
This bait

Attached: 5bc7c2cf1d00008b0030910e.jpg (720x480, 84K)

Literally what network is better? It's impartial by law, it makes BBC news, it makes the best documentaries on the planet, there are no adverts - what's better?

every american teenage girl religiously watches Doctor who
babsestation

someone just put us out of our fucking misery already

Attached: 1518125490445.png (1200x764, 1M)

>UK has a tax on broadcast television to fund the BBC, which produces programming that blows most US networks out of the water in quality
>you only have to pay it if you own a TV and use it for broadcast television
vs.
>US using everybody's tax money to drone bomb sandnigger weddings and make fucking Sesame Street episodes whether they like it or not

I fucking LOVE these chimps from Jow Forumsthe_donald like OP actually getting angry about people being allowed to directly choose what they do or don't want their tax money to be used for.

You'll probably never see a verification screen. Don't worry.

Attached: 1531182964488.jpg (1920x1080, 1.12M)

>It's impartial
imagine actually believing this

>documentaries
this is the only argument in favour of the bbc, but a lot of their documentaries aren't even good, there are just a few gems (attenborough's stuff, basically)

>there are no adverts
there are adverts, just for the bbc's own shows and such instead of products

The bbc gets roughly the same amount of complaints from each side of the political spectrum saying that it's not impartial, so yeah, I do believe it. It's literally law. Pro tip, reporting on things you don't think are important doesn't mean it's not impartial