Does China really need these regions? Why won't the let them become independent?

so stupid

But if your policies promote the mixture of Han and Uyghur bloodlines, won't you just end up with mongrelized Han? Do Chinese have different notions of racial purity?

Attached: IMG_8399.png (442x341, 182K)

Fuck off

>Ningxia
Doesn't want to be independent
>Guanxi wouldn't survive without the Chinese support
>Tibet
Good buffer
>Xinjiang
Same as Tibet
>Inner Mongolia
Chinese coal comes from there which benifits both locals and China

Have you ever looked at someone from South and North China?
They don't look the same.

main reason is because they form the perfect geographic barrier for mainland han Chinese.

Attached: relief-map-of-china-and-nearby-countries-.jpg (1300x1219, 405K)

Well yes just like in Europeans the first principal component of genetic variation within the Han is the North-South cline. However, don't North Han sometimes feel they are superior to South Han?

Racial purity is whiteshit's autism.

Chinese don't talk about the cultural revolution ?

you know that copypasta about chinese being rape mongrels?
a chinese person would read it and be confused as to why the tone of the post is so derogatory. they do not think about race the same westerners do.

The North Han are the ones who were raped by steppe nomads for thousands of years, sweetie

>Ningxia
Does literally nothing happen there?

china is authoritarian not retarded. if you want to keep land permanently you need your people to life there and get rid of ethnic minorities. the easiest way to do that is cultural assimilation, colonisation and interbreeding. otherwise you will always have independance movements. genocide isnt an option in the modern age.

Hmmm

So then what is the Chinese perspective on hapas

Attached: IMG_8428.jpg (779x1000, 131K)

It keeps horde unity down and allows both islam and pagan groups harmonized with confucianism.

They do and you can find all those topics in Baidu Baike. It's just some retarded American sperg-out over their sudden realization that China is taking over now. There is one American tard in Jow Forums spamming every single China thread with pics of chinese animal cruelty. They are really devastated mentally over what is happening and coping.

Based kings and generals viewer

Because a smaller name font is equally annyoing in both Eu4 and real life

>China is taking over now
We've been hearing this for 40 years at this point when it began with Japan, yet we grow every year. Yawn.

Resource extraction.

They're filled with natural resources and act as a buffer. Xinjiang is particularly important because its filled with oil.

Well then you have nothing to sperg about

the genetic difference between the north and south is greatly exaggerated desu

Not everyone has the autistic one-drop policy when it comes to blood. A lot of other peoples follows more of a general principle than an extreme level of science. If you're half chink half something else they won't think of you as a pure chink. If you're a quarter something else and 3/4th Chink except when it comes to seeing that your parent is not pure chink they won't care as much. Past being a quarter nonchink and you get into irrelevant territory unless it's blatantly visible.

By comparison in Jim Crowe South a woman was caught fucking a black man. Her lawyer used the argument that because his client was an Italian with ancestors from Sicily and thus it was likely she had blackamoor blood in her. She was declared not guilty. However you also did have the Nazis in the Nuremberg laws allow for eventual Germanization despite diluted blood. 1 Jew grandfather whose son or daughter is half Jew produces someone who is seen as part of the German community but not German blood. If they marry a member of the German blood then their children are part of the German blood and German community.

Han don't have anything like Nuremberg laws that I know of, but they won't give a shit that your ancestor 100 years ago wasn't Han if you look and speak ching chong.

post haplos, it's time for daily autism

How does it compare to the genetic distance between Italians and Swedes?

it would act as a buffer if it was independent. china is ruining their international opinion by occupying their regions. they can afford the trade wars and bad relations at the moment but their golden age is about to end. they will have to make some states more independent if they want to function in the international community

>it would act as a buffer if it was independent
Not when they side with the enemy and let them build bases or impede their development plants west. Why would they make the same mistake as Russia after the Soviet Union? They ended up fighting really hard to keep Chechnya too.

One way to visualize this is a matrix like the one to the left. You see pairwise population Fst statistics. The largest is between Guangdong in the south, home to Hong Kong and Guangzhou (Canton), and the northern provinces. The Fst value between Guangdong and Shanxi in the center-north is 0.0029. You may know that the Fst value between Han Chinese and Northern Europeans is ~0.10. A 34 factor difference, more than one order of magnitude. As a point of comparison you can find Fst tables which show values between English and Croations and English and Spaniards are about the same as between Guangdong and Shanxi.

gnxp.com/WordPress/2017/08/01/the-great-genetic-map-of-china/

Attached: IMG_8431.png (400x406, 195K)

More curious is that some North Chinese seem to show evidence of admixture with West Eurasians. In particular, they show affinities with European populations. Again, this is not surprising. Some earlier analyses have shown evidence of European-like admixture in northern China, and among ethnic groups like Mongolians. More precisely there are strong signals of European-like admixture in the northwestern provinces of Gansu, Shaanxi, and Shanxi.

The details here are important though. The authors note that Hellenthal et al. detected admixture in the from Northern Europeans into North China using haplotype based methods to around 1200 AD. This preprint finds a similar admixture date. But they caution that these admixture dates may only signal the latest of the events.

As for what that event could be, there was clearly turmoil on the Silk Road in the years around 1000 AD. After 750 AD for all practical purposes the Chinese lost control of their portion of the Silk Road, what is now Xinjiang. Turkic groups like Uyghurs and Iranian ones such as Sogdians were prominent in China due to a power vacuum (the Uyghurs were used by the Tang emperors like the Germans were used by the later Roman Emperors, as federates). Later on one saw the emergence of Tanguts, various groups from Manchuria, and finally the Mongols. Since both haplotype based methods and these preprint suggest something around 1000 AD, the most likely candidate was the absorption of Central Asians with some European-like ancestry into the Chinese substrate. The Uyghur conquest of the major cities of in the centuries before the rise of the Mongols famously resulted in the assimilation of a European-like population which had earlier spoken Indo-European languages.

Attached: IMG_8339.jpg (470x591, 191K)

>won't you just end up with mongrelized Han?

The Han are already heavily mongrelized.

Attached: 1529834370763.png (800x1672, 209K)