It's time for another one of these threads

Attached: politiscale 1.png (668x968, 178K)

I'm not sure, it either didn't like my results or there wasn't a flag to represent it

very understandable

I see...most people who are politically involved tend to have strong opinions so yours is actually a surprise-look at the other results
dumb commie

these threads usually get insta deleted

Attached: download.png (800x1200, 200K)

sure, dataminer-san, i'll gladly post my political views here.

insta what?
Also
>t.one of 500 communist sects claiming to be the real vanguard of the revolution

>100% communism
woah

Yeah cause political ideologies from the users of a frog posting board is very valuable data

Attached: italian groper.jpg (495x495, 40K)

insta deleted, because mods think they belong in Jow Forums
also I'm not a bolshevik, but I'm ok with them.

what's the surprise? I don't like capitalism
if you're the Russian that posted the other image then you got 95%, that's not that different.

Oh yeah that didn't load on my screen for whatever reason

I think the variance in political ideologies is Jow Forums material t b h and also Jow Forums is a shithole

Attached: Hmmmm.png (469x560, 11K)

I agree, then again we're not the mods.

Humanity Socialism Liberty

that explains basically nothing.
post the image dummy

Attached: 20181203_022704.jpg (1080x1785, 437K)

it has a sad face because out of the possible 16 items, only 1 got more than 50%, which makes him effectively an NPC and it didn't know what flag to give him.

dont get this question, why would you limit how long someone wants to work?

Attached: Screenshot_20181216-193032_Firefox.jpg (1077x195, 21K)

no my brainlet frined, it's not about how much they want to work, it's how much employers should be allowed to force them to work.

That can only happen if a single employer has a monopsony over the labour market (Applies to the government too)

well they cant force you, you can just quit the job, if someone is willing to work 80 hours a week for that same job why not

I'm not sure I would say I'm an NPC, my hobbies just don't involve larping

what to put if I think using fossil fuels are necessary to build up shit like solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear plants to live off of renewably?

Attached: hmmmm.jpg (529x124, 9K)

do I seriously have to explain to you the """free""" market and how this would affect working hours in general?

Neutral/Hesitant

Go ahead, without a monopsony employees would be able to get favourable jobs really easily

simplified: if one employer offers a job with more hours and gets employees, he's effectively beating his competition in the """free""" market, which will force the competitors to either do the same or go under.

the free market is not free, it's retarded.

How is that not free? If a company becomes bankrupt due to another company offering better/more work they would never survive for a second in this globalised world of ours.

h8 me

Attached: Screenshot_20181217-105154_Samsung Internet.jpg (805x2220, 440K)

that's my point, how is it free if it rewards exploitation?
restrictions on the market are good, like the maximum number of working hours, among many things.
the freer the market, the more oppresive and busive it becomes, that's not freedom, all in the name of profit, if you're not a billionaire and you defend it, you're retarded, if you're a billionaire and defend it, you should get the rope.

based monarchism

Attached: politiscales.jpg (732x2095, 371K)

>t.took too much LSD

Attached: Slap fishe.gif (329x182, 35K)

understandable but outdated
Without competition stagnation is assured, private or public.
And you guys love the labour theory of value so surely you can recognise that employees will be attracted to better working conditions that don't go crazy on the ratio of marginal revenue product to wages paid over exploitative business practices

Attached: syys.png (1196x752, 21K)

better working conditions (and companies) that don't go crazy

>Without competition stagnation is assured, private or public.
what makes you think this?
>And you guys love the labour theory of value so surely you can recognise that employees will be attracted to better working conditions that don't go crazy on the ratio of marginal revenue product to wages paid over exploitative business practices
I don't get this, what are you even saying?

1.No competition has the same effect to the economy as a monopoly as human greed is inherent
2.Employees will naturally flock towards companies that compensate them fairly

What the hell does this mean? What am I?

Attached: PicsArt_12-16-10.09.38.png (1170x1737, 506K)

>1.No competition has the same effect to the economy as a monopoly as human greed is inherent
this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and you're using a false equivalence.
>2.Employees will naturally flock towards companies that compensate them fairly
fairly? this statement is too ambiguous, do you mean "more than other companies"? if that's the case that'd be obviously correct, but that's not fair, they're still being exploited.

Big-tent
1.How is it a false equivalence?
2.Your definition of exploitation is not only subjective but also arbitrary and revisionist.

Big-tent?

>How is it a false equivalence?
no competition does not mean monopoly.
if you pay workers according to labour hours, there's no free market because you're obligated to pay them what their labour is worth, you can't pay them what you feel like their labour is worth, you can't have some companies paying their employees higher or lower wages than others, they all have to pay the same, and there's no monopoly.
>Your definition of exploitation is not only subjective but also arbitrary and revisionist
arbitrary? why? labour is the source of all value, if you extract surplus value from a worker, you're effectively exploiting him.
how is this revisionist exactly?

Attached: chrome_2018-12-17_05-51-00.png (1175x1669, 445K)