Thoughts?

Attached: 7ED0CA0C-98BD-449E-8B0A-FEC5434AD922.jpg (750x758, 90K)

What the fuck did he even do this year to warrant being person of the fucking year.

And please no Jow Forums answers. I can't think of jackshit that he did that was noteworthy. At least nothing more than what he does all the time (ie. funding social movements)

*heavy hand rubbing*

But being rich and wealthy is HAAAAAAAAARD~~~

Remember, no radical social movements, which question the prevalent status quo, because capitalism is best possible meriticratic system and people running it are the most capable people in the world. Wageios, little cuck.

Based.

Shorting entire economies, that’s pretty ambitious I guess

Seems fitting for a publication called the Financial Times to award a neoliberal billionaire with their "Person of the Year" award, desu.

I still dont understand why russia interfering in democracy is bad but soros funding tons of far left drivel is a-ok

He is the boogyman of both the far-right and far-left.

Because funding social movements isn't a crime.
Whilst hacking into governmental institutions is a high crime at best, and an act of war at worst.

Get out of that rulecuck mindset, it's not representative of reality. The people sitting on top don't give a fuck about universalist moral rules, they care about pure power. This is war, and they're just rooting for the home team. To them, George Soros is on their team so it's good that he's operating within their domain, while Putin is the enemy so it's bad that he's operating within their domain.

>democrats
>far-left
Imagine thinking a billionaire would fund the same people who want to seize all of his wealth and put his head on a spike

desu the extreme wings of the democratic party in the USA are full on commies, but they are most certainly a minority.

Same can also be said in the republican party (on the opposite end of the spectrum) though.

This should be pretty obvious to anyone with critical thinking skills

You're completely fucking braindead if you think Soros has any relationship with anything remotely "far left". He is a classic neolib who made his wealth off the global capitalist framework and puts his wealth partially towards political enterprise that will maintain this corporate orthodoxy.
People like him are generally despised by the "far left".

He was clashing with Orban, the Hungarian prez. With the new law that would increase working time and whithold wages, Orban is looking evil-er than ever.

>desu the extreme wings of the democratic party in the USA are full on commies
You're a fucking idiot.

>openly financing and supporting certain candidates/parties in your own country is the same as spewing tons of fake information onto the internet in the hopes of destabilizing the western world
ok ivan

*stubs toe*
"OMG IT'S AN ANOTHER CONSPIRACY BY JEWISH ZIONIST ILLUMINATI MASONIC EVANGELIST LGBTI+ LIBTARD INFIDEL (may Allah forgive me for uttering this word) SOROS TO WEAKEN AND DIVIDE OUR NATION AND SUPREME PRESIDENT"

>unironically being a commie
kys
I hate Soros with a passion, but you are somehow worse.

>implying trumptards actually get up and walk

I was talking about erdotards

>This should be pretty obvious to anyone with critical thinking skills
Evidently not obvious to toothpaste :^)

Soros has said that he does what he does because he's a Jew.

Soros has also said that he helped the nazis

Somehow I think some Finnish shitposter is not worse than pure evil incarnate

At least you have Mosques.

It is only natural that people without scruples are cynics, since it is hard for them to relate to the motivations of scrupled people. Doubly so when pertaining to their social superiors. When they look to their inferiors they can dismiss their morality as stupidity. When they look to their superiors they are pushed to think of their virtue signals as dishonest so they don't have to recognize people can be both more successful than them and also more deserving of that success.