Thoughts?

SEETHING Southoid

Attached: IMG_20181219_061601.jpg (540x414, 30K)

The more mixed the more racist

Why do "white" Americans think the one drop rule doesn't apply to them?

Attached: why.png (449x498, 72K)

>tfw in completely white state on that map
it does

Attached: 12.jpg (1190x839, 157K)

It does not seem to be real

geneticliteracyproject.org/glp-library/?_search_bar=160,000 Americans

Or at least the source is false.

I also looked through all of Jon Entine's articles and found not a single one related to what the AP claims.

Actual obsession.
You seem to imply that I care one bit about race.

It's the fact that you autistic midwesterners/northeasteners act the way you do that makes us fucking hate you lot.

Honestly few people in the south are racist anymore. Even people that grew up during segregation generally don't care about stuff related to that.
At least not to the extent that people like the one you're responding to do.

The idea that we do is a Hollywood invention, or based on people thinking it's still 40 years ago.

lmao Finngols got blacked

Attached: Census_Bureau_2000,_Scandinavians_in_the_United_States and Finns.png (1383x508, 332K)

based

>Most likely not, but the ones that would care enough to get a 23andMe probably are.

Why would the blacks getting a 23andMe test be so different from general population blacks?

>But 25% being an average is a ludicrous number.
It's really not. Gene flow was extremely one-directional between the whites and the blacks. 25% for the slaves and 1% for the owners is perfectly believable.

Because it would be people that have been in the country for hundreds of years, not relatively new immigrants from places like Jamaica/Dominican Republic.

It also implies that, for the people doing the tests, they have little to know solid information about their family history. Which, say if they had a completely "black" history say moved from the south after Civil War and lived in Harlem to present, then there'd be no purpose in doing a test such as this.

That would imply that all American slaves had sexual relations with the master, which is blatantly false.
Or that all blacks in America are descended from slaves, which is, once again, blatantly false.

Do you think the same thing is occurring with Latinos?

What do you mean?

nah, it was mostly slavermasters' jungle fever

>The mutt memes are true
Do you not understand how averages work in a sample size of 160,00?

What's the gray area in the latino pie? Mystery meat?

That the latinos in the 23AndMe are not representative of the actual population of Latinos in the US. The same way you're implying there is some selection bias of blacks here, because only certain blacks would even get this test done

the whole "you are not white because there are others in your country who are not white" meme is very disingenuous.

it's like saying the netherlands, germany or sweden isn't white because the EU has meds in it

Cut off the the southern half of the US and our demographics would look a lot better tbqh

I don't even know where to start from this post. The fact that you equate germany and sweden to US state status inside the EU instead of individual countries, or the fact that you don't realise that meds in europe count as white/european in the US because they have european ancestry in contrast to "latinos" who are a whole different beast.

Only 160k people? The country has millions of "humans"

the difference is stark

Attached: hdi by state.png (1144x613, 155K)

comparing EU cunts to the USA is not a useful or accurate comparison. states are a closer match.

I find it weird how West Virginia is so close to highly developed parts.

ok now show the list of quality of life per state

Attached: 1544939549508.jpg (247x223, 14K)