Arabs are even more rejected than blacks

>arabs are even more rejected than blacks
why?

Attached: 1501636822491.png (712x303, 130K)

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1/pdf&ved=2ahUKEwihoPq27qzfAhVN3qQKHWaWBIQQFjACegQIChAB&usg=AOvVaw1p36Ad3YdX32rZXJJnz06Z
scholar.google.com/scholar?q=reliability and validity of iq tests&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because we rape in the name of Allah

always wanted an asian gf but god decided to make me an asian male. rip

Jews have a hate boner with arabs

blacks are insufferable by lack of education
arabs are insufferable by ideology

>40% of Asian women exclude Asian men

What the fuck is wrong with Asian women, holy shit...

Too chauvinistic probably

>What the fuck is wrong with Asian women
Asian ****************Men*********************

>white women are by far the most loyal
but Jow Forums told be all white women crave kara boga

Black BVLL

>USA
is there any arab there ? i mean 1 or 2 millions compared to tens of millions of blacks , latinos , asians .... ofc people will respond from what they see in medias

It says middle eastern, not Arab

it's because niggers are docile and obedient bcs of low iq
when WE arabs are as intelligent as wh*toids + more manly, more attractive, more strenght and we happen to think differently to wh*toids whilst remaining attached to our culture and traditions

tl;dr : they hate us coz they ain't us

Yeah we have a significant Arab population.

there's millions of arabs plus a lot of iranians

they look the same, especially for amerimutts that think they are whites

if they thought that they wouldn't be excluded

They are counted as white by our census, but memes aside, the average mutt can tell.

they are excluded because of the religion not the race

Arab isn't a race though, neither is white
Only Amerigoblins make such a distinction

put whatever word suits better in your delicate hears than race then

>source - Yahoo Personals

Why is anyone giving this study any weight whatsoever?

These are literally the stupidest, lowest IQ segment of the American population

These are the kinds of people who went on to post on craigslist personals looking for anonymous sex. Barely below the level of /soc/ posters

These are not people whose opinions on race or dating should be respected. I don't care about their race, I wouldn't touch any of those STD riddled faggots with a ten foot pole

you don't even make sense

most people in the study said they don't have a racial preference

how so ?

it's quite clearly specifying middle eastern not muslim

ok so what

but middle easterns are all muslims
if they are excluded it's because of their religion because they are whtes according to america

so? that doesnt mean you can remove the religious connection. there arent that many christian middle easterners. and even the ones that are are assumed to be muslims in the west.

most middle easterners in america are actually non-muslim
>if they are excluded it's because of their religion because they are whtes according to america
they are white on the census. doesn't mean they're actually treated that way or considered that.

mexicans and indians used to be white on the census, too but it was eventually changed for obvious reasons

Why don’t black women and Asian men breed more ? They are currently the least popular dating partners so wouldn’t AMBW be a good idea?

>lack of education
Even if they were educated they would still speak in ghetto tongue and still have an average IQ of 85

Islam is inherently evil.

they don't like each other
t. read some threads about it on the asian incel forums
asians only want white women and black women only want black men

because they are polar opposites

wrong af

>most middle easterners in america are actually non-muslim
lol

Also this duhhhh
>black women
Masculine, aggressive low IQ gorillas
>asian men
Passive, feminine high IQ nerds

it's true? most arabs there are christian and most iranians are non-religious, baha'i or christian

Yeah lol evolution is fake news all racial groups of people are equal

Also they do take pride in their niggerspeak nowadays.

neck yourself tight, you'll make something worth for this world at least once

Nice science denial

it was not a science denial, it was a call for you to neck yourself tight, for the sake of us all

Because they tend to be violent and stupid I think,

Oh, so you admit you have no argument, just blind hatred for anyone who doesn't subscribe to your naïve Christian/socialist ideology

>raciap groups and IQ
The flag wasn't necessary to know that goblin hands typed this post

no, i don't argue with underaged retards

I don't get it. You have no problem accepting that evolution is real, that certain groups evolved different skin colors, and that some individuals are smarter than others--but the instant you suggest different groups evolved different intelligences as an explanation for the well documented group differences in IQ, you go haywire

stop there, when you'll grow you'll realize being that edgy in your teenage years was irrelevant af

>hurrr not believing ALL groups are equal and evolution stopped at the brain despite specific evodence to the contrary makes you edgy
>af
Cringe

I cope by wanting to be pumped by hunks

You've obviously got a stubborn opinion on the matter but that's a false equivalence fallacy.
Intelligence is perhaps the most complex polygenic trait and is influenced by far more SNPs than skin colour.
There is currently no non-circumstantial evidence that racial IQ differences are due to an immutable genetic factor. The circumstantial evidence that does exist is very questionable in reliability based on author bias and innumerable studies and examples to the contrary
For a small example, let's take your assertion that 'niggers' have lower IQ than 'whites'
African Americans and Sierra Leone have higher IQs than Albania, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo

>muuuuuh group of people with black skin is dumber than group of people with white skin because of evolution
lmao you are so fucking retarded

Incoming Jow Forums infomemes

i can't even blame those unskilled kids, when they will grow they will realize it's not about the skin colour but education and social habits

>literally denying evolution and clinging to naïve egalitarianism

>no non-circumstantial evidence
That's the nature of anthropology. The largest study testing black white IQ differences was the Minnesota adoption study, which was somewhat flawed in that the average adoption ages between races were different. Because of hysterical egalitarians like the grenouille in this thread and Turkheimer there hasn't been any testing of this sort since the 70s.

That being said we do have evidence that gene sequences associated with higher IQ in all races are more common in asians and whites than with blacks--there are dozens of them. We also know that some genes associated with brain structure and function can vary more than skin color associated genes between races. We can also infer that adult heritability of IQ is between .5 and .8, which leaves out epigenetics and practically heritable traits like child rearing practices.

It is simply the best inference that race has at least some influence on the racial differences between IQ

>cherry picking
Are you retarded? My claim isn't and nobody has ever claimed that ALL niggers are dumber or even have a lower genetic IQ than ALL whites

Attached: 1506288376006.png (1276x714, 771K)

>study testing black white IQ differences
In the same environment I should add

>muh Jow Forums
Muh /leftypol/

9/11

these studies are like a decade old, probably nothing changed but it's still weird seeing these posted

>probably nothing changed
All the old boomers in that study are probably dead or mentally gone now

I bet the study nowadays would show much less racial preference maybe

no we don't have evidences iq is based on skin colour
iq isn't even a fair metric to quantify intelligence

Heritability refers to how much of the variation in a gene is inherited, not the proportion itself
The Minnesota study has been heavily criticised here with many counter examples adjusting for factors such as the Flynn effect
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1/pdf&ved=2ahUKEwihoPq27qzfAhVN3qQKHWaWBIQQFjACegQIChAB&usg=AOvVaw1p36Ad3YdX32rZXJJnz06Z
>gene sequences associated with higher IQ in all races are more common in asians and whites than with blacks--there are dozens of them.
*associated with higher IQ in whites and asians
Blacks are severely under-represented in GWAS meaning the data for them is unreliable. Even more significant is that SNP sequences in whites that shows high predictive power for educational achievement show very low predictive power in black subjects. This is due to the difference in genomes such that different SNPs have different effects. This is obviously ignoring the fact that fewer than 1% of the supposed SNPs for intelligence have been correlated.

>based on skin color
Nobody has ever claimed this

>iq is fake news
Fucking lol. What's your source? Adam ruins everything? Some journalist peddling 70s era theory of multiple intelligences? Fact is IQ predicts scores on all other legitimate intelligence tests and has the least cultural loading, highest reliability and highest validity of any test proposed so far.

But to be honest it's pointless arguing with you
You obviously have an ideological axe to grind and won't change your opinion on the matter

>Nobody has ever claimed this
you're the one who keep saying niggers are mentally inferior of whites because of evolution lmao

>i don't know what a flynn effect is
But I do, like i said, because of your sort there have been no studies attempting to measure racial IQ differences adjusting for them

>black data is unreliable
It's the least weak inference that black and white intelligence associated genes will be similar in effect. Also the black sample will be more skewed towards higher IQ than the white or asians. And of course it is still the least weak inference that evolution didn't stop at the brain and group gene differences account for at least some of the differences in IQ

>iq is fake news
it is when you use it to quantify intellignece of an individual, it is not to quantify the logic specifically used in those studies

A parting question on the matter:
Define 'white'

LMAO white women are literally the most rcist people in the world.

Tu quoque

And no, I believe in science

Multi celled organisms wouldn't even exist without evolution, so given the gaps we observe in IQ and other (less valid and less reliable) tests the fact that different races evolved in geographic and evolutionary separation seems an obvious explanation--just as it is for differences in skin color. I don't see why you have to deny this so hard

>so? that doesnt mean you can remove the religious connection. there arent that many christian middle easterners. and even the ones that are are assumed to be muslims in the west.

There are 30 million non-Muslims from majority Arab Muslim countries, most of whom are Christian. Several million more Christians originate from Middle Eastern Muslim areas which are not Arabic.

Overall, the percent of the people in these places who are Christians is 12.5%, the same as black people in the USA. Immigrants from the Middle East in America and some other western countries would be 25% Christian or more.

Muslims only became over 50% in these areas, specifically Egypt, Syria/Palestine and upper Mesopotamia at the end of the Middle Ages.

While it is natural that people who aren't Middle Eastern don't know the Middle East very well, one must admit that there is a hypocrisy and discriminatory orientalism when people go on about how Christian Europe is/was filled with Pagan influences, but the Middle East is seen as homogeneously following the ways of Muhammad exactly from the day the land was overtaken by his followers. Especially when the survival of Middle Eastern Christians under centuries of Muslim rule show that European Christianity has roots and was not just invented by Roman Emperors, and at the same time disproves the simplification of the Middle East as static, simple and homogeneous, "never changing or adapting".

but IQ isn't universally fair and acknoledged to quantify intelligence stupid mutt, you can't conclude it's an evolutive aspect

I don't care. In the US it means ethnically European including turks and balkans

That's just not true. As I told you before it has close to 0 cultural bias and the best validity and reliability of any intelligence test

The people who use dating apps are nowhere representative of the whole population.

Most people find their SO in college/uni or at their first workplace. People bond here beyond their own ethnic groups.

If Jow Forums wants to lower race mixing they should normalize the use of dating apps in the general population so people don't think it's something only for the bottomfeeders that couldn't find a mate in the real world.

>That's just not true
you're in fucking denial

You don't even know what reliability or validity are and you're pretending to have knowledge of a scientific consensus or even minority opinion that just doesn't exist. Sad!

I can't quite see what's the agenda behind this post

>In the US it means ethnically European including turks and balkans

I don't think so. Films portray non- indigenous Hispanic people as non- white, thus, Andalusians and others are considered non- white, in theory.

You don't even know what intelligence is but you use inaccurate tools like IQ to quantify it and conclude about your racist ideology : sad

>Sad!
Literally kill yourself.

and your point is? fact is that if people think of arabs and other middle easteners they assume they are muslims. you cannot disconnect islam from any discrimination middle easterners might face. thats all and its a fact.

white wimmen gettin BEANED

Attached: n2_640_384_90.jpg (640x384, 58K)

Read a book sometime

scholar.google.com/scholar?q=reliability and validity of iq tests&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
We're talking about what scientists in the US classify as white. I don't care and prefer to use more specific ethnic terms

what

He's just a fat stupid burger. Ignore him.

>Read a book sometime
i can give you countless examples of books saying the exact opposite at your biased point of view

Turks are NOT white

What about those who speak a language that has only 1% or less of its speakers as Muslims, and who are not under Muslim rule, yet are clearly a minority compared to nearby Muslims? In other words, people who have assimilated in no way yet are the minority. They exist.