Scots still opressed by brits after hundreds of years

>scots still opressed by brits after hundreds of years
>literally none of the bleeding heart faggots on Jow Forums care because they aren't brown

Attached: 1531816445233.jpg (288x252, 24K)

We joined the union under our own volition.

Attached: 1515878031369.png (2098x798, 440K)

And how do I know you're not a perfidious Bongoloid?

scots are brits, also they are anglo-saxon just like the english.

scots dont care enough to vote for independance from their opressors

maybe people on Jow Forums would care if they didn't vote to remain in the union

The Scots have always wanted to be English, ever since the 12th century or perhaps even earlier. Scottish history reads like one big effort to anglicise the nation, so an independent Scotland makes no sense because it goes against everything the Scots have always strived for ie to become indistinguishable from the English.

Only the smart and attractive ones

if we wanted to oppress the scots, we'd probably stop letting them leech massively disproportionate amounts from the government

Give a couple years at this rate.

No, we wanted to be like the French. It's difficult to tell because for most of their history the English aristocracy also wanted to be like the French, except for in the early days when they were actually French.

Subtle

Scot in russian means "cattle"

>Oppressed
Scots always looked up to the English and voluntarily formed a union between the two kingdoms and wanted to even before the wars of independence. And speaking of those wars, the English were absolutely in the right.

Skot is also an amusing curseword around these parts which means 'spawn' (sth that has been spawned by an animal, skoteno).

Scotland is NOT a real country! You are an Englishman with a DRESS!

Attached: 1530589794885.png (250x316, 94K)

>oppressed
>this fucking meme again
they're literally given preferential treatment: free university tuition, free prescriptions etc.
god i wish they'd just fuck off

wtf i love yanks now

DO IT AGAIN EDWARD

Attached: Edward Longshanks.jpg (640x986, 100K)

The only people oppressing Scots are Scots

>oppressed
enriched*

Attached: 1543553358498.png (1180x1278, 171K)

>Scots

No such thing unless you mean highlanders. I'll explain it to you favelado:

Starting in the late middle ages there was a slow, unhindered angloid plantation of Scotland, basically south Scotland. With the passing of time and muttification, this created las creaturas known as lowland """""""scots"""""". By the 16th century las creaturas were basically acting as a 5th column of the angloid in the kingdom of scotland and eventually managed to hand over the last sovereign of Scotland, Mary I Queen of Scots to the angloid Lizzie, who swiftly pulled a mexican beheading on her. Afterwards, in the 17th, Scotland was nominally independent but in practice under the de facto dominion of the angloid as the King of England was also the one of Scotland. The final nail on the coffin happened in the late 17th with the Darien Scheme. The Darien Scheme was a """scottish""" (read la lowland creatura) to settle a colony in our rightful clay. It all ended in disaster due to a combination of Spain hammering las creaturas and perfidious lack of actual English support.

They had invested a gazillion amount of moneys in the project and now it was all lost and Scotland was bankrupt. As expected, the 4-d chess plotting angloid then stepped in and offered to pay denbts in exchange for le Act of Union, and Scotland """on their own volition""" said "yes, yes into le act of union!!! Thank you good sir!!!".

Scots are Brits

>The Spectator

Attached: 634349.jpg (640x480, 36K)

>Scots aren't oppres-

Attached: screen shot 2016-06-24 at 7.21.45 am.png (1213x752, 215K)

Is Brit really a valid denominator or is it just a weasel word for 'sort of English'?

One more generation and the Irish larping highlanders will have been completely driven from Scotland, beautiful.

I assume it means person who's from the British Isles. So that would include English, Scot, and Welsh

scots are an anglo peoples. the real scots are highlanders

>cherrypicking deficit figures from when oil prices were at a historic low

Attached: 7632b708a159b75c7deb06f3b01d3982.jpg (236x211, 10K)

*Ignores the original source*

Attached: 1507557732255.png (679x769, 58K)

It's a euphamism for English. "British" identity in Scotland has been all but dead for a decade or two. When folk voted to stay, they mainly did it for economic reasons.

In a strict, geographical sense, yeah. But no one actually uses it like that.

Based
Auld alliance never forgetti
Norway is invited too

The figures are bogus.

Even most reliable figures, GERs, is largely guesswork. You can't really slice up a single country by area and accurately measure deficit.

Yeah, we did totally the same with Sweden.

>Taig

A Scottish King formed the United kingdom

We here believe in Empire.

Hello Nige.

And then English aristocracy deposed his dynasty, brought in a German one, and annexed Scotland officially after bribing enough of the Scottish lords.

>British Isles
You must mean the European Archipelago.

Do you really think that whatever "oppression" you went through is in any way comparable to what happened to nonwhites?

Attached: cong_hands_1904.jpg (1400x802, 161K)

>we liked the union when we created it but now it's oppression!

pull the other one

>Seamus O'Paddy

Do you really think the "oppression" your founding fathers went through is in any way comparable to what happened to nonwhites?

We didn't create the union, and we didn't like it when it was forced upon us. There were riots in every major Scottish town, we have records from English spies saying so. One of the first things to happen after the act of union was the occupation of Scottish fortresses by English troops.

Yeah

Attached: 1511802001866.jpg (653x655, 45K)

No, that's why I'm not making threads about it.

Well then you're a bit dim.

It's a different order of magnitude, sure, but oppression is oppression.

SECOND STUART RESTORATION WHEN

99% of the "Scots" you hear complain about the United Kingdom are 19th/20th century Irish blow-ins who never integrated into our society. They're also the reason why Glasgow went from being one of Europe's great cities to a third world shithole in less than a 100 years.

Never

>popular sovereignty
pull the other other one you joker

You said
>in any way comparable
I would complain if I stubbed my toe, but I wouldn't whine about how no one takes me seriously compared to a veteran with his legs blown off.

It was barely even passed by the aristocracy. Most abstained.

Well, not OP in fairness.

irrelevant
the king is the first authority under god

God is dead.

>vote to remain in UK using EU membership as an argument
>brexit anyway
lol

>scots still opressed by brits
Today I hate Brazil just a little bit more.

Attached: 1545145332587.png (1080x1440, 1.8M)

Yeah, but now we got the Lib Dem types behind us, so it's a little more inevitable than before.

Let's be real, Scots will never break free from English overlordship. Even their national heroes of "independence" William Wallace and Robert Bruce couldn't do it.

Attached: Robert the Bruce.jpg (350x262, 10K)

>but now we got the Lib Dem types behind us, so it's a little more inevitable than before.

Attached: 1544893369219.gif (408x225, 1.76M)

uma delicia

Yet no one cares about Wales...

As far as I can tell "British" identity is mostly used in the following ways
>used by well-to-dos in Britain
>used by unionists/loyalists in Northern Ireland as contrary to being Irish
>used as the naturalised label for immigrants similar to "American"

God is dead. Long live God!

>Lib Dem types behind us
better clinch lest they try to slip in