What do you think of my home?

What do you think of my home?

Attached: 350px-Ca-regions.png (350x398, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/xhtiT9dY6vQ
economist.com/united-states/2018/10/27/why-one-of-americas-richest-states-is-also-its-poorest
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mexifornia.
Commiefornia.
Lgbtfornia.

If you're from San Fransisco go kys

faggots

Seems hellish.

I live there :3

Hopefully the chinese will cleanse it when they take over

I nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.

>be californian
>wear a hat
>get shot
youtu.be/xhtiT9dY6vQ

I think your home is an embarrassment to human civilization.

Attached: cali2.png (977x613, 756K)

Should secede from trumpistan and establish its own state. Already has very aesthetic flag for this

Attached: 41w3_2b-f1cll._sx475_900x.jpg (313x239, 15K)

Thoughts on our first flag?

Attached: 1280px-Pío_Pico_Bear_Flag.png (1280x875, 283K)

I wish I lived there.

They should add a second head to this bear then

I prefer the second flag

Attached: Storm_Bear_Flag.png (894x599, 80K)

Imo looks more fitting for some German state or city instead of American country

Wish you would secede already so we would never have a Democratic president again

The founder of Sacramento was from Switzerland and the flag is based on the coat of arms of Bern.

If you are over 18 and still live there you should kys. As soon as I was old enough I left CA and moved to the Canadian Maritimes. I didn't know anyone here and had never even been close but it was the farthest away I could get from SoCal without leaving the continent.
It was an excellent decision.

Attached: vIqOrwLsOzIpsHT89OZmZ8zgN0_IxyeVjGWQ4ADvnmc.jpg (640x667, 69K)

*blocks your democratic stronghold*

Attached: Jefferson_state_flag_svg.png (1024x624, 79K)

Sending some compadres there right now, ajua!

Except "Jefferson" (never going to happen) is mostly blue, sweetie
Go be a hick somewhere else

Not so fast, commie

Attached: Jefferson_Presidential_Election_Results_2016.svg.png (800x917, 88K)

>breaking up Californian already ruled illegal based on state constitutional
Never happening faggot.

>2016 elections instead of midterms
>when OC was still red instead of completely blue like now
Sweetie, your meme state will never happen and it's blue now.

Attached: 1526498985517.jpg (866x900, 124K)

>What do you think of my home?
You should be nuked like everyone outside of the Free Republic of Appalachia.

Attached: appalachia.png (2000x1239, 1.06M)

Inbreds

>everyone outside of the Free Republic of Appalachia.
>no more people to leech off
lmao

Only green are based i assume

hi

This

based

That place is a shit hole.
Everybody does heroin, and the only good jobs are government.

Mutts pls go, only pure bred ANGLO SCOTS-IRISH APPALACHIAN BVLLS may reply to me now.

Y-you too.

Purer than you, Cleetus McCousinfucker

Attached: 23andme.png (927x344, 15K)

B A S E D

Attached: 54e60e21ae0ca40ec20fd71ba92948a9.png (209x200, 14K)

>euro mutts
Cringe.

>UK
>white
yikes!

>quarter scots-irish
>quarter german
>half hungarian
Am I white?

>56%
yes

I love California, its my home :3

only cool and relevant place is shithole amerikkka

Not everyone else is a richfag who can afford to move out

you are the reason that California sucks. instead of staying and defending your homeland, trying to improve it, you fled.

you left a gap for some chink or wetback to fill, and now there is one less of us fight for what's good, and one more hand (soon to be several) asking for their gibsmedat.

fuck you for deserting your homeland when it needed you the most.

The fight was lost before we were born. All you're doing is bailing water out of a ship that sunk to the bottom of the sea 50 years ago.

>only richfags can join the military
>only richfags can apply to universities
>only richfags can search for jobs outside their area

Leftist Californians attempt to virtue signal by simply pointing out they’re from California. Conservatives love mocking California by calling it commiefornia or by being self-hating Californians. But here’s the fucking red pill: they’re both wrong and California is neither a virtuous progressive diamond in the American rough nor a communist, let alone socialist stronghold.

Fact: California has the 5th largest economy in the world ranked by GDP.

Fact: California’s poverty rate is 19%.

Fact: USA’s national poverty rate average is 14%.

California is a pathetic state that does not take care of its people, leftists BTFO.

California is not communist or socialist. The fact that its heavy regulation stands alongside its economic excellence is a contradiction to most conservative ideology and that’s a fact the right won’t accept.

California embodies multiple ideological contradictions. An extremely wealthy state with some obscene regulation and taxation. And an alleged progressive bastion with higher than average poverty and wealth inequality in a shit hole country that does not care for its fellow citizens.

California is a pathetic place and almost all opinions on it are misinformed and californicated. You’ve all been had. Congratulations.

OH FUCK OH GOD WE’VE BEEN FOUND OUT

>Good goy fight for israel
>Marxist training camps
>Company will pay for new housing and move

cringe and bluepilled

And here’s your source, losers: economist.com/united-states/2018/10/27/why-one-of-americas-richest-states-is-also-its-poorest

The regulations followed the economic success. Not the other way around. It's a lottery ticket to get to be the the state that occupies most of the Western seaboard and ports, and have Silicon Valley sprout up in you and represent the modern economy. Regulations didn't make this happen, the state succeeds in serious spite of them. For now. The budget is in some deep shit and they won't be able to coast on their luck forever.

>fight for Israel

Join the coast guard and the only fighting you will do is against a trophy marlin.

>The regulations followed the economic success. Not the other way around.

I’d love to read your dissertation on such a categorical claim. You’d have to be naive to think it’s that simple or that policy and economic development moves in such a straightforward manner. You’re giving a verbal argument without really meaning or knowing what you’re saying. Just because you can string together grammatical correct sentences does not mean what you’re saying is true or even empirical possible.

>Regulations didn't make this happen, the state succeeds in serious spite of them.

Did you read what I said? My point is more or less describing the states success in relation to heavy regulation except your “in spite of” traffics in your ideological bias that heavy regulation and extreme economic success are ultimately incompatible.