Black people

You can't get into literature without a grasp on abstract concepts
Did you honestly fall for Jow Forums memes?

Attached: chadlaozi.jpg (1200x701, 167K)

>You can't get into literature without a grasp on abstract concepts
Yes you can.

No you can’t. Not without submitting fake essays and shit of the like

according to this onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010
dick size is pretty much the same among races/ethnic groups

Not here, the Humanities are compulsory up to grade 8 and the artistic scene is vibrant so there's a lot of competition.You can't just memorize when examinations literally give you random texts that you were not informed of.

Maybe I'm over reacting, but I just don't see how someone can classify an entire group neatly into his conception of humans

It doesn't sound like you ever took a single course.

And? Do you think that the people who rant on and on about dick sizes have enormous cocks? I'm not gay, but I'll be willing to give a racist white boy my average 6 inch dicke to prove him wrong

Attached: kayden.gif (500x648, 1.63M)

I dunno about education in Australia, but that is the way it is here.

I highly doubt your testimony.

jews
>big dick
>high intelligence

Attached: chad jew.png (1822x1024, 273K)

East asians do not have intelligence but the Han Chinese people do.
>china.usc.edu/sites/default/files/forums/Chinese Inventions.pdf

China today makes up for more than HALF the technological breakthroughs today.

China is great. I am not Chinese but I would be proud to be so. Great in the past. Great in the present. Great in the future. China is amazing and the future.

Because it doesn't conform to your ideal of what education is like over here?
Dude, I've been here my entire life, who are you to tell me that your Jow Forums sterotypes outweight by memories of school days?

Attached: that hispanic feel.png (645x773, 26K)

>Because it doesn't conform to your ideal of what education is like over here?
Yes.
>Dude
Fuck off, aigger.

I was not saying humanties is shit. I just said that it requires creativity, which is the opposite of shit. And so do math and science.

I was just saying that history showed how europeans in general are the most creative race

china is more than 1,3 billion.
put 1 billion native french and we'd be on nova centauri right now

also
>half the tech breakthrough
really doubting that

Well at least you admitted it, more than what most racists dare to say, so good on you.

Attached: gab.jpg (1024x576, 50K)

anyway we got bigger dicks lmao

*crotch chops*

Based on what metric are Europeans the most creative race? Creativity by itself is an abstract concept and hence impossible to define

>You can't get into literature without a grasp on abstract concepts
All you need for literature is the ability to manipulate semantic constructs well. You can train people to be good at bullshitting. The only standard of quality for your bullshitting is how well it meshes with the bullshit in other people's brains.

True creativity is only in the fields of mathematics and the physical sciences, where there are actual external standards your work must meet.

>an abstract concept
>and hence impossible to define
>abstract concepts are impossible to define
jesus christ get a load of this utter nitwit

Stop bullying me and go back to solving how many 7D spheres can fit into an 8D box
You should know,philosophy is a hundred years ahead of the sciences

Attached: autistic shrieks.jpg (1000x1008, 106K)

ah, so you can't define an abstract concept? mmmkay, I guess we can't really define anything, as more or less everything is abstract, even the mere concept of a ball.

anyway
music: best and most refined/elegant = classical one (i.e. european)
math & science: just europe, rest of the world was like neanderthal like until 50 years ago (except japan)
literature &humanities: some great works by some asians, still uncomparable to european masterpieces and philosophy

I mean, ok, everything is an opinion at the end of the day, I guess there's no point in debating.
As you said, a lot of things are abstracts, and so prone to a layer of "undefinedness"

I'm pretty sure he's just a troll. He has not said anything of value at all and has no idea about the simplest of concepts.

American white
>big fat cock
>high intelligence

Asian philosophy never evolved beyond the level of the Milesian school.

You didn't even attempt to rebuff me other than saying that my experiences are invalidated by your sterotypes.I do not claim to be smart, nor do I claim to have a solid grasp on humans, my memory is 5 seconds long and I'm sleep deprived, but to call me a troll when you appear to be that very thing from my perspective is despicable, to be frank

Nice bait. Get a (You).

>You didn't even attempt to rebuff me other than saying that my experiences are invalidated by your sterotypes
No, I told you that my understanding of your education system is better than yours.

i don't know about their cocks, but average white american IQ is 105, which is on par with Japan

Have you ever heard of the 100 days of change instituted by the Emperor at the time?(Forgot his name but that isn't relevant)How about Sun-Yat Sen?Hu shi? Even Maoism is philosophy, so go shove your western stick up your ass

You're a pseud. You imitate the forms of intellect without possessing the substance.
Gödel solved philosophy.

Ignore them. They are seething anti-Chinese NPC's who hate Chinese culture, Chinese history, Chinese civilization and Chinese people. Nothing you say will vet through to them.

>china is more than 1,3 billion.
>put 1 billion native french and we'd be on nova centauri right now
The French have had no big breakthroughs in the past 50 years, they've been riding their coattails for a long time.
>also
>>half the tech breakthrough
>really doubting that
>wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2017/article_0013.html

I am not Chinese.

learningisopen.org/oecd/singapore.html

>Even Maoism is philosophy
All it did was take a western philosophy and move it backwards. Your philosophy is garbage.
>Gödel solved philosophy.
True.

Yup, time to pull out the redpills, nigger.

dailystormer.name/black-superiority-myths-debunked-giant-penises-and-so-on/

Attached: 1544763390932.png (351x313, 63K)

Your understanding is literally Jow Forums memes about Chinese people being insectoids who do not have the ability to think, my understanding is my 13 years of experience in the education system(Excluding kindergarten, of course)
To claim that you know better than me is idiocy.

Attached: Hmmmm.png (469x560, 11K)

Argument from authority. Next.

When did I say I was an intellectual? I just wanted to provide some insight on the education system as a counter-point to the Jow Forums memes

Women should be the most intelligence since they have no dicks.

see also this
ethnicmuse.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/east-asian-testosterone-i/

No it's not. Europeans are smarter.
America is the country of Flat Earthers and Creationists who shit their pants at Walmart.

Do you really want to go on this tangent? I can write an essay of all your fallacies that you presented.I'm trying to talk on common ground here, but it's just becoming glaringly obvious to me that the middle ground between Earth and Hell is no place to be.If you really insist on acting in such a childish manner, I will not attempt to respond to you anymore.

>Not being racist
Cringe.

Attached: am4qnajacv421.png (588x536, 325K)

>No it's not. Europeans are smarter.
>America is the country of Flat Earthers and Creationists who shit their pants at Walmart.

Attached: 1466426447170.jpg (601x508, 94K)

And you just ignored all my other points, I really do not see the value in replying to you.

You think I'm a demon now? Let's leave the name calling out of this.

That blog is insecure as fuck but what's wrong with Egyptians?

Attached: t-results.jpg (406x425, 97K)

It's true you idiot. Only reason people moved to America is because they were too poor, dumb and lazy to make it in Europe or they had committed murder and decided to start anew somewhere else, hence why virtually all serial killers are Americans(there's a genetic disposition to it).

>And you just ignored all my other points
I only ignored the parts that did not warrant a response. For someone supposedly so great at writing essays you can't convey your thoughts clearly at all.

Really?You expect me to be polite when you just claimed superiority over my experiences, said I was a troll and straight-up moved goalposts?

kek, the amount of cope itt

Attached: blackmantrollface.png (500x473, 130K)

the source is not the blog, it's a meta-analysis of published articles about differences of testosterone levels among different races/ethnic groups

>claimed superiority over my experiences
I believe that I do, in fact, have a better understanding that you.
>said I was a troll
I believe that you are.
>straight-up moved goalposts
That is false.

The parts that did not warrant a response?Or the parts you were unable to respond to? Maoism is Mao's refinement of Leninism and Stalinism, so you just cherry picked it to imply that the Chinese are incapable of original thought and ignored the philosophers who did not borrow any concepts.

>have big benis
>have low intelligence
>have white skin

Gee I guess Slavs really are pale niggers

I remember a Mexican user posting a study a while back proving that animals raised in the New World (specifically the US) were weaker than Old World ones.

I wouldn't be surprised if that applies to America too.

You definitely did, you took maoism to be my main point and that I implied it was the pinnacle of Chinese philosophy, thus by saying that it was borrowed you shut down my entire argument, at least in your mind

>The parts that did not warrant a response?Or the parts you were unable to respond to?
The parts that did not warrant a response, as I previously stated.
>Maoism is Mao's refinement of Leninism and Stalinism
You mean adulteration.
>so you just cherry picked it to imply that the Chinese are incapable of original thought and ignored the philosophers who did not borrow any concepts.
I did not ignore them, they are just unworthy of a response since they only prove my point that Asian philosophy never advanced further than the level of the Milesian school.

>tfw no bf because am just average

Attached: 1544963694075.png (1032x1026, 846K)

but anyways is not like it matters because testosterone levels are grratly influenced by enviromental factors

>you took maoism to be my main point
False.
>and that I implied it was the pinnacle of Chinese philosophy
False.
>thus by saying that it was borrowed you shut down my entire argument, at least in your mind
Strike three. You're out.

>You mean adulteration.
Proof it's an adulteration?

You're welcome

youtube.com/watch?v=XwP4OdjOLxo

The main problem I have is that you claim a lot, but where's the backing evidence? What are your credentials to claim that our education system requires no creative thought?
I do not have any problems with opposing views, but you haven't provided any evidence for why you feel that you are correct
I'm trying to see things from your viewpoint, sorry for my outburst earlier, I do not want to shift the blame but it has been proven that adults with ADHD tend to be more emotional

>Proof it's an adulteration?
The pudding.

Sorry, that was an outburst.It was, in my view, exactly what you argued about.I have now calmed down, I'm hoping that we can have a civil debate, and get to understand each other's viewpoints but if not, I fully understand

Attached: blackIQ.gif (680x1075, 284K)

are you cute

Don't know, no female has ever said that to me.

Attached: 1541739473242.png (707x1000, 665K)

It's just banter. I'm trying to get a rise out of you. Don't take Jow Forums so seriously.

>I believe that I do, in fact, have a better understanding that you
oecd.org/education/singapore-tops-latest-oecd-pisa-global-education-survey.htm
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.oecd.org/countries/singapore/46581101.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi0m_LohrbfAhUJeawKHZifCIsQFjAFegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3Af2ROf4o91Dp_P4JImjj5
learningisopen.org/oecd/singapore.html

>very hight inttelligence
>very big dick
I'm superhuman

you are cute to me no homo btw ;)

>google
Into the trash it goes.

Oh no I was being dumb again
Sorry...

Attached: wowie.gif (320x180, 158K)

Uhm thanks kind user. I will go no, I need to shower and then go out. I want to enjoy the snow.

Attached: 1541730824824.png (128x128, 19K)

Of course. The fact is that you can even raise your testosterone if you tried to.

Huh? Maoism, as far as I understand it, us just gommiesm with Chinese characteristics.

have fun :)

Interesting theory, but it doesn't explain how Amerilards managed to go from backwater colony to world power in 200 years or so.

Jews.

>dumb luck
>big country
>access to both pacific and atlantic
>jewish trickery to keep israel well armed
>destruction of europe in ww2 and communism in the eastern block

Sexual energy is huge, it's a big part of our body programmation and for most of the animals.
If the coit is restricted then you have an extra set of energy that you can use somewhere else, like having more brain villosities or a higher neural activity.

America is an insanely richly fertile continent. When you have that much land you just have to populate it with people, it's literally too big to fall.

The only serious problem they had was adjusting and unifying their immigrants under the American banner, but this was done through making a boogieman of African-Americans/Native Americans which rallied them together as White Americans. They also don't suffer the same problems the rest of South America did.

Look at China that did the same under half a century.

Protip: blacks have an average size dick and Asian cheat on everything.

i wish i had the balls to cheat but alas my gonads are small

You don't want to be loyal?

>Asians
>high intelligence
Great Asian mathematicians/scientists comparable to Gauss, Euler, Laplace, Newton: 0

Since when was Pierre Berthier, or John Clark jews

Why do you want to hurt his crotch?

Stupid zoomer doesn't even remember the WWF.