Let’s ally with two failing empires and a warmongering idiot

>Let’s ally with two failing empires and a warmongering idiot
>t. Bulgaria
>Let’s ally with people calling for the genocide and replacement of Slavs, the most incompetent people on the planet, and a leaderless empire on the other side of the world
>t. Bulgaria again
What did they mean by this?

Attached: 8B7CBB2D-C3A8-45EA-8D08-A3F330B82A16.png (1000x600, 736)

sticking by their friends

bulgarians are not slavs

Check the maps, OP. They've increased their territory every time.

Honour. Something a filthy jewish lover would never know about

Attached: 963m1vddv8h01.png (432x783, 22K)

Fuck what a retarded strawman
>also mfw wanted to attach the graph disspelling the "slavs were seen as subhuman" atrocity propaganda myth but keep getting errors when i do so

hitler was based

Who are they then?

t. hilter's banker

But slavs are subhumans. Patton said so

Just screenshot it or convert it to jpg or something
it's bullshit anyways

based post

Bulgarians often do utterly stupid things like invading Serbia and getting beaten every time and losing clay afterwards yet they never learn and try this again

Aryans.

Attached: vazov.png (393x522, 364K)

You are the Serb who is residing in Poland!

>bulgh aryans

During the first Balkan war Bulgaria was promised parts of Macedonia, after the Ottomans were defeated Serbia refused to hand over the promised territory
So Bulgaria attacked Serbia, only to be attacked on its unprotected border by Romania and defeated
So in WW1 Bulgaria took the opportunity to take revenge and get what was promised to them by attacking Serbia again (and winning, tho that was negated by the eventual defeat of the Central Powers)
So after WW1 Bulgaria was again taken of its promised territory
In WW2 that opportunity provided itself again and Bulgaria took it again

In a way yes. There is a connection but its not as strong as some would suggest.
There's remnants of aryans intermingled with some races/ethnicities worldwide but there's also some that were partially settled in different regions that remain as such even today.
Some are in syria, some in persia, some in northern afghanistan, some mixed with pretty much everybody....

This is a fair summary, just throw Greece into the mix.
Regarding WW2, Bulgaria had little choice when the Wehrmacht was approaching and it proved convenient. Bulgaria suffered but not as bad as many parts of Europe.
The Bulgars themselves were not slavic, origin disputed. They conquered and mixed substantially with slavs, although not to the extend presented by Russian/Soviet propaganda.

So you wuz khans n sheit?
Pic unrelated

Attached: IMG_20181223_234545.png (558x546, 423K)

> origin disputed
I think it's pretty clear that the original bulgars were turks.

Not very clear since the last 30-40 years of excavation and theory. The field moves on and turkic origin is not backed up very well. For the small amount of info about them in the period "disputed" fits best.

Hun origin was popular with the Germans around WW2 but it is a meme

>this
>a slavic man

Yeah I don't think so. Check And Mate

Attached: 1544997277929.jpg (557x650, 89K)

Bulgaria man, what happened to you? You used to be cool, you used to own Drinopol and were set to take Carigrad...but then you let go and became an underachiever. It's sad to see what you've become.

They spoke a turkic language

Turks are just Arab shitskins, actual Turkic peoples like Khakassians are oriental folk

Attached: hRJcmSg4kAY.jpg (1620x2160, 528K)

Attached: ukY7ticLn50.jpg (540x960, 67K)

Turks like you.

t. actual Turk

Attached: ajxna.jpg (1080x2052, 493K)

Looks like a regular russian to me.

>wikipedia
It's over!!!

Cope, shitskin

Attached: Ukrainians(BLACKS).jpg (600x331, 50K)

Ok arabo-Sicilian