Are you personally hedging and holding this?

are you personally hedging and holding this?

first time i went through roger vers site and this cringe faggot should be shot on sight but he has an army of neckbeards so should one hold some of it?

why is this faggot complaining on his site about 180$ tx fees and 8 hour confirmation times when right now its 0.14$ and 30 minutes?

also why didnt he say a word about LN?

Attached: download-1.png (252x200, 7K)

Bitcoin Cash is unironically bitcoin. I'm Hodling 80% of my portfolio in BCH

>why is this faggot complaining on his site about 180$ tx fees and 8 hour confirmation times when right now its 0.14$ and 30 minutes?
>also why didnt he say a word about LN?
because they move the goal posts every time it's convenient to them. bcashers are mentally unstable.

>why didnt he say a word about LN
Because it’s an obvious train wreck that doesn’t even work without a full node

A hedge? BCH is 100% of my portfolio and has been since August 1 2017.

I don't dabble in shitcoins and that's all I see floating around in this market. People have forgotten that cryptocurrency is meant to be used as a currency, not as a security. Hence why I have chosen by far the most viable cryptocurrency to invest in.

Attached: ymgs0xpqg5w01.png (1024x651, 1.41M)

so why has it performed like dogshit nigger? all i care about is roi and if people all over the world trust btc more and invest in it because of "store of value" meme than i dont give a fuck what you use to buy a dildo feeless

>right now its 0.14$ and 30 minutes

Bitcoin has high fees when there's high usage, which makes Bitcoin unsuitable as a peer-to-peer digital currency.

>why didnt he say a word about LN

It's not even being used. What is there to be said?

Only coin worth investing in

and you think bigger blocks are a permant scaling solution you brainlet?

it could be, as the internet and the storage space will get substantially more powerful in the time it takes for full adoption. satoshi even says this in the white paper

Nothing is permanent, but the fact that Corecucks think that the blocksize has to be permanently at 1 MB shows they're permanently stuck in the Stone Age.

Attached: DeZogkh.jpg (638x479, 71K)

50 of these bad boys. never selling. i can retire off my other crypto holdings. my Bitcoin Cash will secure my family for generations to come

LN has more use than bcash
Keep trying shills

It hasn't.

Since the fork, selling ALL of your BTC on the fork date and buying BCH would of netted you more USD and more BTC value than simply holding both, or doing the opposite.

BCH doesn't need to hit 20k to beat bitcoin. It simply needed to improve upon it's pairing value while bitcoin falls in price. Looks like it continues to do this.

dogecoin has more transactions than lightning TOP KEK

>Because it’s an obvious train wreck that doesn’t even work without a full node
Solution to scalability by BCH is to make the block size higher. I don't see what's the difference there.

BTRASH AIN'T BITCOIN COIN FROM THE ORIGINAL WHITE PAPER SATOSHI NAKAMOTO WROTE IT'S A FUCKEN PIECE OF SHIT FORK AN ALTCOIN

>I-It isn't bitcoin

Corecucks worship bitcoin like it's the golden form of God himself. It's just software, cuck. Software is often improved and bitcoin is no different

Bitcoin is toast.

why everyone forgets about segwit?

What does segwit do, user? Please explain

>why is this faggot complaining on his site about 180$ tx fees and 8 hour confirmation times when right now its 0.14$ and 30 minutes?
Current transactions in BTC are a wasteland, so it's irrelevant.
As soon as it gets over 7 tx/s, it's clogged up.
Why would they not raise block limit to 32mb like BCH is beyond me.
It would make sense to go off chain once you have reached a physical limit to do on-chain transactions, but Blockstream has their own fanatical approach which will bring the end of BTC.

4 mb blocks, lowering fees

4 mb is an extreme case. 2 MB is closer to what we'll normally get

Exactly. Why bother with big blocks or secondary layers for faggy ass micro transactions when you can just use the coin that was made back in 2013 for that exact fucking purpose.

Why not keep it simple instead building a second layer? More complexity = more fuckup.

BCH is the real deal.
Cores Blockstream network is a censored banking supervision bullshit

road to 200k just begun

Attached: 87451.png (1036x564, 38K)

Looks very organic

Attached: 87451.png (1030x562, 84K)

BCH is unironically saving cryptocurrencies from all the newfags trying to destroy it

Attached: D1731C70-E690-41DE-8CBB-9E5918887F63.png (1334x750, 2.56M)

not only that, 2nd layer can't work. Either you make it scalable by not using the blockchain, but in that case it has to become centralized, or you use the blockchain and over a large number of transactions it gets clogged in the same way, since the data that goes into it is the same

Attached: 1528289863355.png (500x483, 122K)

It seems to me that if there ever was a fork of bitcoin that introduced some change that turned out to be unequivocally positive that Bitcoin could just copy the change for itself. Why would bitcoin holders jump ship to a new fork where they will have smaller bags?

Why would you draw random lines?

nothing random about them

why do you cashies keep lying about something that can be easily checked and disproved?
at the time of the fork bch was worth roughly 0.2 btc. right now its worth roughly 0.13 btc and has been steadily declining for more than a month now.
you lost about 40% of your btc by converting and holding it in bch. congrats, you played yourself.

Attached: vers_buttbuddy.jpg (1246x612, 64K)

>jul 24 2017
Fucking retard, KYS

thats when most of large exchanges offered futures trading. but you wouldnt know that, being an easily duped newfag and all

Attached: 87451.png (1032x560, 59K)

>futures trading
lol.

newfags that invest in BCH will unironically be richer than you very soon. Stay poor

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-06-19 01-51-18.png (1920x1080, 1.77M)

looks like it will soon fall out of that channel

ok, retards, lets take another measure: volume.
volume spikes (you know, when most idiots bought this shitcoin) happened at prices 0.42 btc (down 70%) and 0.25 btc (down 50%).
no matter how you slice, bch will always be a shitcoin

By 2020, everyone will be BCH maximalists.

yes sir, you should short sir
shorting is the only way

Attached: 87451.png (1032x558, 56K)

>army of neckbeards
yeah right. cool story bro.

Attached: lulz.png (843x549, 29K)

this, cashies are anti-consistency, anti-logical, anti-factual cultists. shifting the goalposts is their modus prime.

That's when some exchanges in Japan started trading BCH futures, and you couldn't buy if you didn't have Jap or Chink identity cards.

I know, I tried to buy some futures from some of those exchanges. HitBTC offered BCH futures like a day or 2 before the fork but I waited for the moronic corecucks to dump their real Bitcoin for fuck all before buying.

You dense lying mother fucking corecuck