was waiting for someone to BTFO you, but I guess I'll have to do it myself.
>corporations won't use blockchain platforms because they will build their own centralized platforms even though they already are centralized
That's how moronic you sound. You are spewing so much bullshit, that I don't even know where to begin.
>The future of blockchain isn't blockchain.
But a superior platform like hashgraph or a dag.
Something like Hashgraph or Holochain won't completely replace blockchain you moron. They have their use but they are not suitable for every use case that blockchain is.
>You're retarded if you think Enterprise level corporations will adopt a small-level start up platform like neblio, ark or some other shitcoin.
By choosing ARK as an example you demonstrated how stupid you are. ARK is one of the few projects that was literally designed to allow you to do whatever you think corporations would want to do. Deploying private or public blockchains that you can configure any way you want. It's literally cloning an existing platform and customizing it for your needs
Second of all, this is by far the most retarded argument against new technology. If corporations did R&D, design, development, technical support for every new shit that exists on the market, they would never make money.
>why aren't corporations building their own Salesforce, AWS, CDNs, Dropbox, etc.
Gee, I don't know. Maybe because it's a fucking retarded idea and a waste of time and money.
>Ever heard of quorum or Kadena bet you don't.
Oh no, these centralized PR projects from dinosaur companies that try to look hip and cool will totally ruin blockchain. I'm sure they will disrupt everything.
>If amazon decides to build a platform for merchants they will build the best platform that money can buy. Completely private, custom build to suite their needs.
repeating the same retarded shit as before.
Ok, I'm done. Go suck a cock, DYOR and never post again
Attached: 1421678897254.jpg (400x462, 48K)