According to Forbes, Xi Jinping is the most powerful and influential person of 2018

according to Forbes, Xi Jinping is the most powerful and influential person of 2018
opinion?

Attached: forbes.png (589x884, 35K)

>pope francis and bill gates
kek who made this meme list?

this goes to show how poor and isolated you are :)

How exactly do pope francis and bill gates deserve to be on that list? Neither of them can influence or bend governments to their will. Jeff bezos at least still owns amazon and can influence tech policy in US, bill gates can do no such thing anymore. Pope francis is even more irrelevant, literally no world leader/government will bend to his teachings. Majority catholics do not even give a damn about any of the popes.

>Pope Francis
into the trash

I mean he is a dictator with infinite term limits and an obedient populace (because china genocided all the people with high IQ in their country years ago). It's kind of hard to argue he has the most control over his region

China literally has a higher average IQ than the US.

Democratically elected presidents tend to have less power, yes.

Trump has the greatest military in human history under his command. He can't just click his fingers and make it invade somewhere. Putin and Xi could use their lesser militaries to do so, there would be little apparatus to stop them.

>not a single Rothschild
really makes ya ponder

No; the cities that have been tested to IQ in China tend to be limited to Shanghai & Beijing only, at most. That's why their IQ always has **** after it in the notes section. The US tests country-wide. The Chinese leave out their vast swathes of rural countryside that is Africa-tier in development levels & wealth.

As much as I dislike Poos and Street shitting subhumans,
The filthy pajeet is right

>Bill Gates
>Religion
... wut?

>Majority catholics do not even give a damn about any of the popes
You'd be surprised, the Pope's position is a big part of the debate on social issues. It's hard to judge people influential in other parts of the world, Modi has next to 0 influence here for instance.

As for Gates he's still got deep pockets for charity and is brand name, as in literally his endorsement alone is worth millions.

If Modi says I'm gonna plant ships in the gulf of Mexico and bombard/nuke Mexico it will have huge repercussions. If the pope says I want every Christian to go on a crusade on Mexico, nothing is gonna happen.

That's why I question this whole list.

Then your not measuring REAL power. Power isn't about being popular or well known. In my country at least, the most popular celeb will be less powerful than some lowly minister no one has ever heard of.

really almonds my activation

Attached: ifonlyyouknewhowbadthingsreallywere.png (476x426, 248K)

>JVPITER isn't first
Shit list

this is how they say they calculate "world influence"
>Forbes measures the person's power along four dimensions.
>Firstly, whether the person "has "power" over "lots of people"."
>Then the "financial resources" of the person is "calculated" (GDP for state heads and company's assets for CEOs)
>Then candidate's "power" is "evaluated" in "multiple" "spheres".
>Finally, it's checked whether the candidate "uses" his "power".
>Then the "results" are "calculated" by "Forbes editors."

And he is very based & REDpilled

Attached: 7BE69C02-7C9D-46BB-B977-647DCC63E7E6.jpg (741x958, 146K)

>that color

it can't be a coincidence
winnie the pooh

Attached: 1500682885724.jpg (330x319, 120K)

Wrong.

Recent tests were conducted among a representative population.

Also, the vast majority of residents in tier one cities (which contain 200 million people alone) are migrants.

Winnie wins in the story.
So it fits very well.

i honestly believe that civilian society is utterly pointless, non sustainable, stupid, just useless and worthless

what does it even mean to be "powerful" guy in some big city? compare it to someone powerful in the military
by the military i dont mean tourists who were there just for the few months and never even got deployed anywhere, i mean the professional core, i mean hq officers and high command
your average military base has a water source of its own, its own fuel reserves, its own aviation, its own communication satellites etc

10.000 professionals in the military could probably annihilate a 10 million civilian city, i really do not understand how can civilian society and infrastructure be "powerful", its just meaningless and retarded bullshit like fashion or idk, how can anyone find that powerful or interesting or even worth living?

Who do you think pays for the military retard

Yikes such racism

>the cities that have been tested to IQ in China tend to be limited to Shanghai & Beijing only, at most. That's why their IQ always has **** after it in the notes section
what are you talking about???

Attached: 2005.png (647x829, 183K)