LEL

LEL

Attached: 1432657099499.png (1532x763, 215K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hMQmU0epVr4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

nords would be nigger tier if they weren't lucky enough to have spawned near western europe

Viking was just a profession. They weren't an army, they weren't a people, they were Norse pirates.

That's unlikely.

Soldier is a profession too you drooling bonobo
Most "soldiers" at that point were literally just peasants who were given a sword

Why would a few pirates/raiders be expected to conquer entire nations?

>Soldier is a profession too you drooling bonobo
Most "vikings" only went raiding every few years and spent the rest of the time doing peasant stuff like farming. They were raiders of convenience more than anything.

>me cherrypick viking lose make viking loser
dumbfucks, Vikings destroyed and owned the whole East Britain, they were eventually stopped but half of Britain was their rape babies, then Norman vikings wrecked Anglos, who were ruled by a Norwegian ViKing.

Attached: 1542821723569.jpg (851x714, 80K)

>Vikings destroyed and owned the whole East Britain
literally the shitiest most poorly defended regions of britain back then. No great feat by any means

>half of Britain was their rape babies
Absolute bullshit, barely any of uk genetic stock is from scandinavia. And that's only because of settlers, who eventually integrated into british culture

>Norman vikings wrecked Anglos
Normans had almost no connection to scandinavia by the time they invaded britain

they conquered Mercia, which was in the middle and Alfie had to cuck and pay them not to conquer him too, until he prepared. Wessex was the only non cucked region at that point.
>Absolute bullshit, barely any of uk genetic stock is from scandinavia. And that's only because of settlers, who eventually integrated into british culture
the genes are very hard to distinguish and not possible at this point to say how much of it is really Viking, when in fact Anglo-saxons were Danes themselves and native Briton were already quite similar, who know you may be 90% or 10% dane.
>Normans had almost no connection to scandinavia by the time they invaded britain
they were synthesis of scandi and Franks when it comes to culture and warfare, they still remained sea niggers forever, which what the word Viking really means: a sea nigger

>they conquered Mercia, which was in the middle
>middle = most influential
retard, mercia was a bizarre conglomerate of what had once been many many kingdoms. Of course it was going to collapse.

>the genes are very hard to distinguish and not possible at this point to say how much of it is really Viking
No they're not. The distinction isn't much but still observable.

> in fact Anglo-saxons were Danes themselves and native Briton were already quite similar
Anglo-Saxons (aside from jutes) were ingaevones. Not nordic. And besides, britain is only about 25% anglo-saxon germanic anyway.

>who know you may be 90% or 10% dane.
no

>they were synthesis of scandi and Franks
They were completely assimilated by the French, completely different from seanigs

>No they're not. The distinction isn't much but still observable.
wrong dumbass, every next study that comes out on this is radically different than the previous one.
>Anglo-Saxons (aside from jutes) were ingaevones
same shit
>They were completely assimilated by the French, completely different from seanigs
is that why they continued seaniggin while French did not?

eat shit Dane, Britain is rightful Welsh clay and you need to leave

Norman culture was Latin.

Stupid Gruziyan.

You speak very authoritatively for someone who keeps posting complete falshehoods.

>Norman culture was Latin.

Attached: 1526994149681.jpg (763x771, 60K)

>same shit
wrong, you can tell them apart genetically. Compare modern day Dutch to Swedes.

>Britain is rightful Welsh clay and you need to leave
Retarded slavshit, I already told you Britain is only 25% germanic, the rest is brythonic (essentially Welsh). That's like having an argument with oneself

What's it like being a Russian puppet

did you know that spartans werent that good of a warriors and the only reason they survived that long was because of the "legend of the spartans" rather than any military power
in fact in the battle of the 300 it was mainly athenians not spartans afaik
youtube.com/watch?v=hMQmU0epVr4

Why are you guys arguing with a thirdie? You know his highest education is the equivalent of finishing primary school in our countries right?

Vikings in general were... weird. I remember the story about the ones that raided here.

>Arrive to Northern Portugal and Galiza up the river
>About 1000 lads
>Kidnap local lords daughters, demand ransom
>Ransom is given
>However they changed their minds
>Ask if they can stay here, because the land is very good and it rains a lot for the crops
>Lord is confused about this change of heart
>They give the ransom back and instead are giving a little land
>Work as bodyguards and farmers and assimilate

Attached: 1543612634756.png (645x773, 11K)

>wrong, you can tell them apart genetically. Compare modern day Dutch to Swedes.
and you are going to have limited success and would have to interpret ton of shit yourself

>i'm only 25% Swedoids, rest of is pure Paki
you still need to leave

there is no bigger meme than a "good and bad schools" teachers are dumbfucks everywhere, that's why they are teachers, if you actually think you are going to learn anything valuable in there you need to hang yourself

>and you are going to have limited success and would have to interpret ton of shit yourself
No, if you look at any fucking genetic chart you can observe for yourself a clear distinction between North and West Germanic.

>25% Swedoids, rest of is pure Paki
No you absolute retard, I'll reiterate: Britain is 25% Germanic, 75% Briton.
Why is it so hard for you to understand this

Wholesome.

Attached: 1533941132395.jpg (1280x895, 169K)

>No, if you look at any fucking genetic chart you can observe for yourself a clear distinction between North and West Germanic.
they are already interpreted by the researchers and they themselves admit it's very hard to tell

>Why is it so hard for you to understand this
I'm not serious about that, you literal autist