USA develops new weapon

> USA develops new weapon

Hurray, USA is great, what a nice piece of technology!

> Russia develops new weapon

Fkn gasoline station shithole, imperialist bastards, i wish they died

Attached: DWpUQaaWsAAH8r1.jpg (640x480, 37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_Kurnaz
abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=1997083&page=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Control your fear.
What is ARPANET?
The technology in this new project will trickle down to the commercial sector, like everything else.

That's how propaganda works anywhere.
Just take a visit on Jow Forums and see what i'm talking about.

Too bad there is no any space race and competition among technology anymore.
If SU still existed we would colonize Mars already

The funny thing is some Russians actually believe that

>If SU still existed we would colonize Mars already

If the Soviet Union was so great, it wouldn't disintegrate in the first place. This entity was pretty much technologically backward in comparison with the USA already in 70s, not to mention a huge gap that was generated in such things like standard of life of societies.

H-20 or B-21, Jow Forums?

Attached: 300px-H-20_Bomber_first_image.jpg (300x180, 16K)

Chinks copy even advertisments of Northrop Grumman

Actually, it is reasonnable to say China copied the B-2, then the US copied the H-20.

Nope, it is not reasonable to say this.

this lmao
>muh rockets
meanwhile the USA founded modern genetics, electronics
russians are backwards retards
they can only rely on nuclear weapons they stole from the USA and rockets stolen from Germany to threaten the world with terrorism

>they can only rely on nuclear weapons they stole from the USA and rockets stolen from Germany to threaten the world with terrorism

Nothing lasts forever. There is a huge chance that the sole fact of possessing nuclear weapon in form of ICBMs and nuclear warheads attached to ballistic/cruise missiles, won't guarantee immunity to countries owning such a weapon in foreseeable future. Russians already feel the heat, that's why they are generating so many CGI cartoons about superhypersonic underwater nukes lately.

He is right tho you fucktard. The Cold War was a time where new technology was developed in order to win the space race or spy on one another. It's called competition

>He is right tho you fucktard. The Cold War was a time where new technology was developed in order to win the space race or spy on one another. It's called competition

Competition ended for Soviet Union in the end of 60s. Second half of 70s was already catching up.

You totally missed his point you low IQ retards

>You totally missed his point you low IQ retards

Or you might be overinterpreting his words.

The idea of celebrating the creation of a new weapon of war is downright fucking atrocious. How of a fucking sociopath do you have to be to gain pleasure from creating such a tool of murder?

No, his point was pretty clear.

>The idea of celebrating the creation of a new weapon of war is downright fucking atrocious. How of a fucking sociopath do you have to be to gain pleasure from creating such a tool of murder?

In case of the USA, you can be at least sure that they won't use these new high-tech toys against their neighbours.

>The idea of celebrating the creation of a new weapon

By the way, Putin announced creation of hypersonic weapon to Russians during Christmas, as a gift to them.

Don't underestimate american disdain for human life.

Attached: images.jpg (300x450, 16K)

>Don't underestimate american disdain for human life.

Objectively speaking, the USA is the most humanitarian empire in history of humankind, if we compare their abilities to genocide people with actual number of people they killed. They waste huge amounts of resources on developing weapon that would be precise enough to kill target as exactly as possible, to reduce collateral damage. Such "empires" like Russia ain't so softcore, because they can't afford it.

Would you rather be "liberated" by Russia and have only a few deads like Crimea, or freedomed by the US and spend more than 10 years in total chaos like Irak?

Russians have murdered thousands with their illegal attack on Ukraine, Ivan.

Russians always add insult to injury with doing people transfers and Russiication. Russian culture and people are the worst in the world so it's always the worst situation there is.

Crimea was a model example of unlinear warfare technique developed by Evgeny Messner in the 50s. Today's Russia geostrategists simply applied it to Crimea, and preparations for this action lasted for many years before. I could talk for an hour about details now, but it is pointless. You Westerners call it "hybrid warfare".

Classic Russian warfare using conventional weapon is still pretty much primitive. You could see it in Eastern Ukraine lately or in Chechnya or even in Syria lately. Russians failed to develop precise targeting mechanisms, so they just use simple drones for targeting and shell whole parts of territories with MRLs and low-tech MLRS in hope that this rain of fire is going to kill those whom they want to kill, while killing thousands of people who were not lucky enough to be away from the mess. To increase the damage, Russians developed MRL using thermobaric ammo such as TOS-1. Pretty messy...

>Objectively speaking, the USA is the most humanitarian empire in history of humankind, if we compare their abilities to genocide people with actual number of people they killed.
do you seriously believe this bro? yes they are more "humanitarian" than the nazies or mongols but they fucking got millions of people killed in vietnam and the middle east

I mean one is on your side and one isn't, why wouldn't you have a double standards?

Sides ain't equal.

>vietnam
>middle east
at least get your facts straight the only war after WWII where we came close to fucking up civvies that bad on our own was in north Korea during the Korean war

why do you think Vietnam is our friend now but N. Koreans still mostly hate us?

you have to be a pacifist to ignore any benefit to a country's security better weapons could grant
guess you don't really worry about that in Australia much

>vietnam

That's 60s, mostly. I am talking about today.

> the middle east

Vast majority of civilian victims were just an indirect result of American presence there: muslims were just exploding themselves in public places all the time for over a decade. But you can't really blame America for suicidal nature of muslim people

pls elaborate

Russians have inferior moral grounds to the USA. USA is basically more moral - in comparison with Russian Federation - if we define morality according to christian model.

mb I though OP post was being sarcastic

That's because you are being accustomed to anti-americanism present on this imageboard, i guess. The OP was just presenting worldview of an average Pole.

If you want to talk about dirty weapons, the US using depleted uranium on civilians is what you want.

I didn't know civilians drove tanks innadesert

>the US using depleted uranium on civilians

The US is using depleted uranium in tank ammo to increase armour penetration by concentrating the force of a shell into as small an area as possible. Russians do the same. I doubt the US is using depleted uranium against civilians, at least nowadays.

theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq

america talks a lot of shit, never does anything
big mouth but no action
"hurr war with china is coming" 2 years later we are still waiting, sometimes they harass random shitholes in the middle east, is it really worth it ? if usa just fades into obscurity and doesn't start ww3 it will be forgotten as the shittiest """"superpower"""" that ever was
do it already start world war 3 FAGGOTS

Russia is a better superpower than US if you compare the kill counts and destabilization of world. Still shit tho.

So maybe the US Army just used anti-tank ammo based on depleted uranium in areas inhabited by civilians. But it doesn't mean that the US Army was deliberately killing civilians with using this ammo. It is dumb to think otherwise.

>Russia is a better superpower than US if you compare the kill counts and destabilization of world. Still shit tho.

The USA never established Gulag, and never invented ideology that killed 100 mln people

DAS RITE

Today's war is not really huge lines of soldiers and tanks forming epic fronts and clashing against each other. Today's war is for example using revolting masses against governments that you would like to weaken. Yellow jackets, rings any bell?

>communism killed 100 trillion people
lmao. Also did you know that US has more people in prison(totally and per capita) than stalinist USSR had in imprisoned?

thank polan
depleted uranium isn't as bad as it sounds although it may be toxic and harmful that's only if ingested or inhaled and it's not radioactive
could still be harmful but it isn't that blatant

>The USA never established Gulag

What is Guantanamo?
Whata re the several secret CIA prisons around the world?

I'm not defending Russia, but US can be just a shit as the Russians sometimes.

>It is okay when the US does it
>It is not when Russia does it (in smaller proportion)

we can totally do nuclear genocide and it would be a good thing
besides i completely support yellow jackets, but go ahead tell me your conspiracy theory, in your opinion who is behind the yellow jackets then ? i am curious

The fuck do you think a 120mm shell do when it collides with a hard surface? It creates dust.
Jesus, americans truly are fat and stupid.

Guantanamo can't be compared to such things like Gulag or nazi death camps by any measure.

Only around 1,5k DU rounds were used amongst few million of them during whole Iraq campaign. And usage of them was justified tactically.

Go suck a dick sascha

The torture still exist, two wrongs don't make a right.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_Kurnaz

>The torture still exist, two wrongs don't make a right.

Tortures are not equal. You can use a torture to force a muslim terrorist to tell you details about terrorist net, and this knowledge can save lives of thousands of people. But you can also use torture like nazis did: for sadistic pleasure, to "punish subhumans". Or you can use torture the way soviets did: to break a man and force him to admit committing crimes he never commited, to have pretext to execute him shortly after show trial.

>it's the US-loving polack again episode

Based pooland

>Or you can use torture the way soviets did: to break a man and force him to admit committing crimes he never commited

Literally the same happened in gitmo and they weren't isolated cases.

>Literally the same happened in gitmo and they weren't isolated cases.

Keeping these muslim-heads in Guantanamo was never aimed at judging them in front of court, but only at retreiving precious informations from them and using them as bargaining chip towards terrorist organisations

>it's ok when America does it

Come on now...

>I've been btfo in every line of argument
>let me identify him as an archetype of a poster! that'll show him!

The difference is Russia captures the poor bastard and kills him brutally to then find out he was innocent because Russian intelligence is garbage and kill everyone who exposes them

You are wrong in that there isn't difference. US intelligence captures innocent muzzies all the time too to torture.

That's literally my point towards CIA, read my posts again.

The only fault of the CIA is that they became so powerful at some period of time that they lost recognition whose interest they are defending. Are they defending interest of the CIA? Or the USA? Or powerful cliques influencing them from inside? Or foreign countries? As soon as they sort the shit out, they could just serve interest of the USA and nothing more.

Do they also capture their families and bury them in mass graves in the middle of nowhere?

I don't know, Canada's been looking at us funny recently.

There are or were innocent people in guantanamo

>There are or were innocent people in guantanamo

In the highest level of activity of the Guantanamo period, there was only 241 inmates in it, in aveage period 41. If we can measure morality with using numbers, you can't really compare millions of annihilated victims of Gulag or nazi death camps, with dozens/hundreds of people who were tortured in the Guantanamo camp, resulting in no fatalities at all, especially if we take into account that these tortures were made only to retrieve informations from inmates that could radically increase national security of the USA, and save lives of thousands of people.