Am I the only one who is jealous of the geograpic diversity that Americans have?

Am I the only one who is jealous of the geograpic diversity that Americans have?
They have everything from Alaska, to Hawaii, and eveything in between. Canada doesn't have anything cool or exotic

Attached: 1535285496603.png (299x318, 221K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=SxhUsPBFPkU&t=294s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I guess you just never been outdoors.

Where I live (BC) has lots of variation:
>Temperate rainforest
>desert/shrub land
>Boreal forests
>Dry pine forests
>Mountains
>Flatlands
But this is very small vegetation/climate variation compared to the US

I dont think that such big countries as Russia or Canada are worse in terms of nature variety compared to USA. In terms of temperature - yeah, our countries are just becoming colder, not warmer.

But the biggest problem is roads I guess. You just can't drive so much in Canada or Russia as in USA. So there are too many places just hidden from simple eye. That's what I think.

>You just can't drive so much in Canada or Russia as in USA.
I remember reading that roughly 90% of Canada's population lives within 100 miles of the US border. The vast majority of their country is just completely uninhabited.

I do feel this sometimes but then I remember that the US is the size of a continent, and that flying from the north to the south is essentially as far as me flying to Africa. Canadians do get a bum deal though

Hard to say why. Maybe USA could have same situation but I think civil war just divided whole country in too muh parts that tried to be as far as possible from each other to get strategic power, so when the whole country got along all the towns in different parts of the country already were created.

While Canada just was British, USA was divided by France, Britain, Spain, Mexico etc...

>Am I the only one who is jealous of America?
No sweetie. Eurocucks stay mad at us regularly for no reason at all, makes me think they might actually be jealous

>Hard to say why.
Not really. Canada is fucking freezing, most of the place is just not somewhere where people can live comfortably.

I'm not sure I really buy that. Even in the days when modern US territory was split between Britain/France/Spain/Russia, the population was pretty spread out. Like the British colonies had major population centers from Boston to Charleston.

Yeah the Biomes here are pretty cool.
PNW biome is cool Canada has it too.

Attached: Temperate Confiferous Rainforest.gif (396x297, 82K)

I agree that my theory is kinda stupid but what's the point of living in Nevada for example in the days when oil had no usage and casinos didn't existed?

Alot of the land higher up is uninhabited marsh like land.
youtube.com/watch?v=SxhUsPBFPkU&t=294s

There wasn't a point, which is why Nevada was basically empty for most of its history, even long after we "bought" it from Mexico.

Gold.

like 95% of the population live more south than fucking London. Fucking southerners.

Temperatures in North America and Europe are vastly different at the same latitudes. Idk why exactly, but Boston is much colder than Paris despite being south of it.

probably ocean currents or something, otherwise most of europe is temperate compared to extremes found in the US due to most places being surrounded by water vs. landlocked in the US. Usually means that the US landlocked state will have warmer summers and colder winters than the europe latitude equivalent. Changes once you get to somewhere like deep in russia where it is far from currents

my midwestern city is about the latitude of rome

Attached: the same latitude cities.jpg (1026x1104, 533K)

Yeah it's the gulf stream, the warmer water means it can never get too cold, it's a big heat storage thing. So keep it coming please I don't want a Canadian climate

Nevada doesn't have any oil.

We get a fuckhuge polar jet and yurop gets thermoregulated by the gulf stream; fucking Paris is farther north than Duluth.

Hmm, this is sort of correct. Our biggest cities are all close to the border, and then there are the northern territories and all those islands that are completely uninhabited, but much of the country does have smaller communities scattered throughout.

This is correct

Attached: 8C2AFC40-4301-4B5A-8B53-0B80472C65B1.gif (720x540, 44K)

People live where the land can sustain them. America has huge areas of fertile land and good climates. All good for sustaining large populations. Russia and Canada have good land too, but lots of land that cannot sustain more than a few tiny communities. Australia is similar, but heat and a lack of water rather than cold and permafrost limit our land.

It always tickles me how Canadians who live within spitting distance of fucking Ohio brag about how harsh Canadian winters are.

It’s a meme, the parts of Canada most Canadians live in aren’t the bad at all.