Are Latinxs basically a new race?

>WHG/EEF/ANE mix
what does that mean?

hey and who was the ugliest part of you mix?
the anglos, saxons or the ashkenazi?

>Latinxs

latinx lol

Zitto Animale

They're population genetic constructs used in certain models of European prehistory. Basically the idea is that some combination of these populations gave rise to the modern range of genetic diversity in Europe.

Why aren't the falklands part of Latin America in that picture?

Attached: cutegrill.png (389x386, 312K)

Because they aren't.

WHG = Western Hunter gatherer
EEF: Early European farmer
ANE: Ancient north Eurasian

Scottish DNA

To add onto that I believe the founding groups of Europe were the Western hunter gatherers, Eastern hunter gatherers, Natufians, Neolithic Iranians, and Neolithic Levantines.

Because they're not the Malvinas

You can't lump us all together. We are too different from each other, if it's difficult for you to spot differences between neighbors, surely you'll find some considerable ones between Mexico and say, Argentina.

who

but you're taking two special cases, a majority mestizo country and majority white country
most of Latin America is still roughly the same culturally and genetically

Based Julian

accord that brazil have 100 million whites

eastern hunter gatherers ARE ANE, they cluster together and EHG have a derivated haplogroup from the ones found on the Malta-Buret sample, basically ANE who migrated to the east became the ancestors of native americans, while the ones who migrated west became the EHG after slight mixing with the WHG.

Natufians, Neolithic Iranians and Neolithic Levantines are all the same group, Early Neolithic Farmer, who when migrated to europe and mixed slightly with the WHG became the EEF.

The original groups from which europeans descend are: WHG, EEF and Yamna, with Yamna being further divided into CHG and ANE/EHG

You make a fair point, but I'd still wouldn't put them all together, culturally we are similar, but not the same (specially if you compare the countries in the southernmost part of the continent with the rest, the way the spanish conquered and settled in these places marked differences that last up to this day). Also, while many countries here have a lot of mestizos, to give you an example, chilean mestizos aren't the same as mestizos in venezuela, both share spanish ancestry but different native ancestry.

>Also, while many countries here have a lot of mestizos, to give you an example, chilean mestizos aren't the same as mestizos in venezuela, both share spanish ancestry but different native ancestry.
interesting, never thought about that

south/central american natives are homogeneous as fuck, they are so homogeneous that you cant even tell one group apart from the other through autosomal data

Idiot

no

show me a single genotyping and analysis company or laboratory that further breaks down native american information

no one does, even the haplogroups are distributed evenly throughout the contient, this is because native americans are the result of 2 different bottlenecks with a further minor one when they crossed panama

how was chile's colonization different from the rest of latin america

Idiot

>Argentina
>Majority white
lolazo

>both share spanish ancestry but different native ancestry.
different kinds of spanish (or even non-iberian) ancestry, different kinds of amerindian ancestry and different degrees of black admixture

dont call me idiot bitch i'll fucking murder you

Attached: image.jpg (525x350, 81K)

,, |,,

Attached: fuck you monkey faggot.jpg (627x930, 54K)

So like every country is like white + native + black in varying degrees

..!..

>he uses his own pics as reaction pics

Northern south America/Southern Central america (Panama/CR): Chibchan tribes, carib tribes, some Amazonian tribes
Andean South America: Incas
Southern South America: Mapuches, tehuelches, diaguitas, incas

THe difference is how predominant they are. O course they are very present in the southern Andes, wayless in the southern cone and finally almost extinct in northern South America

..!..

the pic was the last thing i had on my desktop and it was on point

I'm not against the thread, but don't say Latinxs.

°°¦°°

For starters Venezuela is NOT a Mestizo country. It is predominantly trirracial with significant African input. I've been there a couple of times in different regions (Andes, East and Caracas and so I know what I'm saying.

The only significant mestizo area in Venezuela (in red) is the Andes region (Tachira, Merida, perhaps part of Lara), which is basically an extension of the Colombian andes and the plains (Apure and part of Amazonas and Bolivar, which are just an extension of the Colombian plains as well. They are also mestizo (White+Amerindian). These areas DO NOT concentrate the majority of the population though.

The rest of the country (in orange) is trirracial just like our caribbean coast or Panama. In green, is the predominant amerindian areas, which for Venezuela and Colombia are sparsely populated, and they start increasing or become more noticeable the further south you go into Ecuador

Attached: Sin título.png (868x766, 199K)

why do coastal nigros come to our cities? they should go to the coast don't you think?

Brazil is also different from Spanish America

cause the main entry point is Cucuta and the roads only link to interioir cities. If they were somehow taken to Maicao instead then it0s be another story and we'd all be happy

>Latinxs
>x

Attached: 1527540414215.png (308x539, 180K)

Latinx DNA

Attached: latin-america-finestructure.jpg (1324x1092, 304K)

Attached: latin-america-native-spanish-conversos.jpg (996x1100, 199K)

Este estudio es de antes que depuraran los repositorios nativoamericanos de marcadores europeos, por lo que esos porcentajes son correctos, mexico no es 60% indígena y brazil no es 80% europeo

LOL IMAGINE LIVING IN THE AMERICAS?? DIVERSITY IS A MEME. THE ONLY LANGUAGES YOU REALLY HEAR ARE.
>ENGLISH
>ESPAÑOL
>PORTUGUESE
>FRENCH
IN THE OLD WORD WE HAVE A FUCKING NEW LANGUAGE CULTURE HISTORY EVERY FUCKING 100 KILOMETERS
.
HAHHAHAH MOST PEOPLE IN THE NEW WORLD CANT EVEN SPEAK NATIVE LANGUAGES OR FORM A NATION THAT SPEAKS IT WITH ANY BASTARDIZATION HAHAHAHAHA ALL OF YOU ARE CLASSIFIED INTO 4 GROUPS THAT PRETTY MUCH LOOK ALL THE SAME. INDIOS MESTIZOS, CASTIZOS, AND MULLATOS> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCKING LOSERS. COLONALISM WAS A MISTAKE

t. cucked by arabs

>HAHHAHAH MOST PEOPLE IN THE NEW WORLD CANT EVEN SPEAK NATIVE LANGUAGES OR FORM A NATION THAT SPEAKS IT WITH ANY BASTARDIZATION HAHAHAHAHA
Based, fuck índios.

nevermind the study is from 2018, I am reading it right now

I've never heard of this CANDELA database, but the results seem kinda off, not by much in peru, colombia and chile, but a lot in brazil and mexico

Yeah, we're years ahead of everyone else in this aspect.

Latinx is tumblr Anglo nu-speak because we're too retarded to understand gendered words please don't spread its usage.

Latinx latinx latinx latinx

More like Latwinks lmao

Could you explain? Sounds interesting

>Latinxs
fuck off, faggot
it's latinOs

He can't explain. He's the peruvian race autist and he gets pissed whenever a DNA study shows Latin America isn't as white as he wishes it was. In fact, all latinos behave the same way.

kys jew

You have to go back.

it's latinAs

I've already returned to my home: Aztlan

post tits, whore

Why are you like this?

install gentoo

Lol I knew it, Carlos. Azlan..Is that by wakanda?

Most people think Native Americans are one big single race, but the truth is we're so diverse. Literally each tribe could be considered a different race. Inuit, Iroquois, Navajo, Sioux, Seminole, Meshica, Tupi, Inca, etcetera. We're all different.

No, whenever I see a Venezuelan or a Colombian I can instantly tell him apart from a Chilean

>we

There are two tribes in Mexico that are more genetically different than a random East Asian and a random European can be.

Proofs?