Most evil countries on the planet

I never got this meme.
How are we the villains of history

Attached: ugh.jpg (640x628, 40K)

sup billy

this

Attached: anglo butcher.jpg (413x600, 68K)

Germany is a Hannibal Lecter type of villain, England is a Gordon Gekko type of villain.

It seems like somewhat of a stretch to suggest that the Netherlands was a particular "victim" of British foreign intervention.

Sociopaths can be very successful.

James... don't you have some Boers to genocide?

Attached: Oy Blimey.jpg (680x458, 85K)

Attached: 1548680382187.png (218x231, 13K)

Nope, SA seems to be doing that fine themselves :^)

Be England
>invent voting
>end absolutism
>start the industrial revolution
>haven't invaded Europe for 500 years
>when asked, Euros are only able to point out things that just about every country does
>get involved in both World Wars ONLY to defend small nations from the evil imperialism

niggers that dont know history

we went a bit far with the boers and dresden

So it would seem, as well as retards that just need an excuse to dislike us.

We never actually genocided Boers, and Dresden was a perfectly reasonable target.

>We never actually genocided Boers, and Dresden was a perfectly reasonable target.
But muh literal Nazi propaganda!

based, you mean

we are LITERALLY the only two countries that have contributed to humanity. everyone else's contributions are insignificant.

The so-called "Boer genocide" is completely fabricated, and the so-called "concentration camps" were actually meant to be refugee camps - conditions only worsened due to food shortages (incurred by British soldiers too), partly resulting from continued raids on supply lines.

As for Dresden, it was critical for the German rail network and the destruction of that city definitely allowed the Russians to gain quicker access to the German heartland.

That is your perception because our diametrically opposed worldviews have shaped the world, practically always there is a German position which is opposed to a British position.
Which is most clear when you look at the 20th century, where twice the entire world was burned to ground over exactly that conflict.
Thus in the end someone will always perceives one of us as evil.

>your country would literally still be filled with natives and tents
>we brought civilisation

>and the destruction of that city definitely allowed the Russians to gain quicker access to the German heartland.
Why the fuck did you want that?
You started the war to keep Poland independent and in the end you won, but Poland was occupied by the Russians?

>get involved in both World Wars ONLY to defend evil imperialism
Ftfy

Attached: 9780307405166.jpg (477x720, 55K)

Actually that's not quite true, the treaty with Poland was only to defend them from Germany, and therefore any result other than German occupied Poland is a win for us.

>>invent voting
Uhm
>>get involved in both World Wars ONLY to defend small nations from the evil imperialism
Poland was certainly a perfectly independent country, not ruled by an "Imperialist" power after WW2, good job on that LMAO

>Why the fuck did you want that?
I didn't. I'm just saying that it was not an unreasonable target for the war-effort. It made the Reich fall faster, which was essentially the goal at that point. I'm not saying it was a good thing.

Well, yes but you still entered the War for Poland not to be submitted by an "evil" totalitarian regime and in the end Poland was occupied by an "evil" totalitarian regime.

Sure, from a strategic standpoint it most likely was a pretty good Idea.

>>invent voting
>>end absolutism
>>start the industrial revolution
Are you trying to imply these were good things?
>>haven't invaded Europe for 500 years
>>when asked, Euros are only able to point out things that just about every country does
>>get involved in both World Wars ONLY to defend small nations from the evil imperialism
lmao

>in the end Poland was occupied by an "evil" totalitarian regime.
not him, but when the UK entered the war, who could've predicted that the USSR would end up crushing Germany and occupying Eastern Europe. Even in 1941, military strategists still predicted a German victory in the east
Had we known the alternative, our actions in 1939 may have been very different.

Germany was a threat to us, the SU because of it's geographical position wasn't, we said we'd defend Poland from Germany because it's beneficial to us to intimidate you.

>pat buchanan
Based for being the closist thing the USA has to traditional conservatism, but generally cringe

>Be Scotland
>More than willing partners in the union
>Your soldiers make up a significant chunk of the British army
>You're heavily represented at every level of civilian and military command
>England still gets the blame for everything and most of the plebs around the world think you're Ireland mk 2
Nice

Attached: yesanon.jpg (1000x800, 61K)

This pisses me off, Scots acting like victims of English oppression when we have done literally nothing to them for 750 years.

>Leaf poster

Attached: 39b.jpg (517x573, 94K)

>As for Dresden, it was critical for the German rail network and the destruction of that city definitely allowed the Russians to gain quicker access to the German heartland.
Yeah that's why you bombed the dense residental area of the Johannstadt in th east of the city with no railways or factories but a hospital to the ground

>Germany was a threat to us
yeah, with a anglophile in charge both times we sure would have attacked you

>get involved in both World Wars ONLY to defend small nations from the evil imperialism
ok, this is comedy gold

Attached: 1550052576922.png (491x585, 101K)

yeah ok

daily reminder anglos are the antagonists of europe and french and germs are the twin protags

>Boer republics

Attached: 1544723563140.jpg (326x367, 86K)