You can't pass any laws concerning guns, "shall not be infringed" is the law of the land

are you a gangster ? is it easy to rob people ?

Attached: 20180829_153109.jpg (3264x2448, 2.26M)

Not even. It's a fun way to blow shit up
No, I'm just a normal American, and it probably isn't to hard to rob people. Never done it though

why should you be allowed to buy an assault rifle

why do you need guns then ? is it that dangerous to live in the richest country in the world ? how is it possible.

It's not called the bill of needs

Define "assault rifle"

shoot him for insulting you

No I'm not violent

Why are americucks not allowed to own nuclear weapons?

Because I like shooting guns

Americans can buy old nuclear silos

We actually are but good luck obtaining the permits to privately own and store a nuclear weapon unless you're a billionaire

>permits
wow, I thought Americans had freedom, turns out you're a buch of commies as well

so what you say is that your hobby is to shoot stuff with fireguns because it's funny ? kinda kid behaviour, it reminds me in my youth when i shot at birds with my airsoft gun and fapped to cheap porn, the good old days, you should grow up as well.

Why do frenchmen always have a stick up their ass

An intermediate cartridge automatic weapon of medium length and weight.
A G36, a M16, a M4, or other ARs, an AK in 7,62 or 5,45 both, battle rifles are generally semi auto and peobably useful for hunting and fun to shoot, but all manners of PDWs shouldn't really be owned by civillians either even if they aren't assault rifles.

No need to project yourself it's not really funny to shoot but it is a rush to throw a propane tank over a fire and shoot it and watch it explode

>don't shoot people, it kills them!

Attached: soy.png (387x437, 77K)

You are just a butthurt noguns. Target shooting and hunting is perfectly valid hobbies. And since Im in the military time at the range helps me do my job too.

why do americans have an hamburger in place of a brain ?

>im watching exploding stuff, so funny

Attached: 20180901_152340.jpg (3264x2448, 3.01M)

Noice. Romanian stock?

so what you say is that the anons here are either militaries or hunters, i doubt it.

Polish

Nice argument you got there

Why should you not? The state shouldnt decide what I want to buy.

Literally half of midwest Americans are hunters

How is the stock? Thinking of getting the same one. I'm 6'6'' would the length of pull be too short?

Or target shooters yes. And anything can be a range target really.

we can all agree that the idea of a citizen militia armed with AR15s overthrowing the most powerful government in the history of the world is obviously no longer relevant

also in the age of atmoic weapons an armed citizenry is no longer necessary to prevent foreign invasion

a bolt action rifle can assasinate a tyrant just as well as a semi auto, if not better

QED there is no legitimate argument for civilian ownership of self loading rifles in this day and age

Battlerifles are almost exclusivly select fire, but rather uncontrolable in FA.

you mean your argument that says you own guns because you like watching stuff explodes, yes that's, a weird argument to justify the fact to own guns.

I know, but I'm saying they are useful for civillian use if semi.

>also in the age of atmoic weapons an armed citizenry is no longer necessary to prevent foreign invasion

Its what won the Vietnam war and what is winning Afghanistan. Against the US govt.

FUCK gunfags. If you have a gun ok, if you hunt cool. But the "obsessed with guns until it becomes a major part of your identity" guys... just weird and pathetic and it is a 100% guarantee they are extremely stupid.

if north vietnam had been armed with atomic weapons they would not have had to resort to guerilla warfare

>we can all agree that the idea of a citizen militia armed with AR15s overthrowing the most powerful government in the history of the world is obviously no longer relevant
>Dude, all US soldiers will just shoot their own families because they signed a pice of paper a year ago, the military will easily win!

>t. Seattlite

so you mean half of the less populated part of the states are hunters do it justify there are more than a gun per capita, strange.

>i don't see the need for it therefore the gubment should prohibit it
Boomer mentality as is
>a bolt action rifle can assasinate a tyrant just as well as a semi auto, if not better
"No"

Attached: 1465519827606.jpg (312x123, 35K)

Yeah, but they are not are they? And neither is 99% of the countries in the world.

why would you need to target shooters, don't they have policemen in the states ?

Limp wristed coastie

It sucks to be honest get a regular one instead
Yes I live shooting and blowing stuff up and I can in my country your appeal to emotion and spamming muh children cant change that

if they're going to overthrow the goverment why not just get on with it and do it? now seems like as good a time as any? people can barely afford anything while guys in aspen are wiping their ass with uncle sam? go take your country back? or are you gunfags not man enough?

There are more then one car per capita too, does that mean everyone has to be a racedriver?

Your mentality that the state should just ban everything that its citizens doesnt need is just gay.

>i don't see the need for it AND there are signifiacnt public health costs therefore the gubment should prohibit it

>"No"
lincoln was killed with a derringer

fine i will admit that argument for any state not covered by western nuclear deterrence

This one is mine
I just love the A E S T H E T I C of the wire folder

Target shooting is a sport. An olympic one infact. Should we just ban all sports now too? Its not about taking a policemans job.

i know it cant change and i dont want to see it hapening, i mean how could we laugh about your stupidity otherwise ?

Even if you are under the western nuclear umbrella you still need some form of defence. And a cheap and effective way is to make sure everyone can handle a gun, either by conscription and/or letting citizens own weapons.

Most hunters can have 12 plus guns
Shotgun for birds
Shotgun for the kids to go with
4 different rifles for different game
A muzzle loader for a different deer season
4 different handguns

i dont remember seeing professional shooters owning several automatic rifles for the purpose to see stuff exlode because you know it's funny..r

>Even if you are under the western nuclear umbrella you still need some form of defence

not against a full-scale invasion, that's the whole point

you need glorified police forces and special ops, a navy and an air force, but not citizen militias

This. I am a hunter in Sweden and even I have 5 different rifles, because I hunt different animals with them.

Kill yourself it's not about hunting

great one european fellow

That because you have never interacted with the gun community.

ok so i can travel california all safe since all the guns are owned by nice midwest hunters.

americans own guns to keep our own government in check according to the amendment, they are not for hunting or sport. checks and balances was the goal.

>not against a full-scale invasion, that's the whole point

>you need glorified police forces and special ops, a navy and an air force, but not citizen militias

You havent been in the military have you?

Cali has the strictest gun laws in the US, yet still the most gun related deaths. Really makes you think doesnt it?

no sweaties i live in rural midwestern gun country. how the fuck would a c*Astalfag even have that opinion? the concentration of gun fags has to be nothing compared to here.
again, i don't mind guns. i don't mind hobbyists, hunters, self defense minded etc. im not pushing some gun control agenda. but god damn the gun fixated that jerk off to their AR, can only talk about guns, only hobby is guns, spends all day long searching for the cheapest bulk ammo deals online - type of guys could all die and the world would be a better place

California has spic gangbangers so enjoy the enrichment

that check is achieved just as well with a bolt action rifle as an AR15, all it takes is one bullet to kill a tyrant

of course not, but i did own and shoot pistols for years and i support gun ownership, just not self-loading rifles

it's about what then, i'm puzzled since one say it's for hunting another one because he love watching stuff explode or the other one because he believe he can hold a trained armed corp with his rifles.

Probably not since most of the non whites in California have guns even though California has done of the toughest gun laws and is one of the most dangerous states

If you went to the midwest more people you meet would own guns but I guarantee you are much less likely to be shot

It's about shooting anyone that tries to step on your snek, whether that's Tyrone, Daequon, Jose, or Pablo, or the police coming to seize your weapons

>i can deal with government armed forces, believe me i trained in cod

>of course not, but i did own and shoot pistols for years and i support gun ownership, just not self-loading rifles

You do relize that something like 90% of gun related crimes is done with handguns, not SLRs, so if anything should be banned its them.

Insurgencies win wars

OP has a great point how are their even laws that contradict the law of the land?

so where shojld i go, i thought visiting the richest state of the richest coubtry would be great but you say it's not, is america such a shithole ?

USA lost in Iraq Vietnam and Afghanistan all by farmers and herders armed with guns

Honestly it's good to visit just never under any circumstance should you move there

>Dude the US Army totally won Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam I swear, no guerilla can defeat them

it is not. depends on where you go like any place. if you want the richest state of the richest country, go to montenegro

i do know that and i do think there needs to be tough restrictions on handguns too, certainly tougher than they have in the US. But i do support some path to civilian handgun ownership

Rich doesn't mean good rich breeds criminal underbelly scum ghettos

Go to Minnesota Vermont Wisconsin Montana

Its not the richest state per capita. Calinis full of poorfags and mexicans.

yes it means guns aren't the solution.

clean your room bucko

Yeah, just like I support some path to civilian SLR ownership.

>implying amerifats are anything close to based Jihadis

>yes it means banning guns aren't the solution.
Ftfy.

The guys who shoot people are not allowed to own guns anyway since they usually alredy have multiple criminal charges, but they really dont care. And thus making it illegal for a non-criminal citizen to own detachable magazines wont do jack shit to reduce gun crimes.

but those people were more brave than you, you guys dont know war.

ban all guns, nobldn6 has guns
>but muuuuh gangsters have guns
they have guns here as well and yet criminality is so much lower than in the states, go wonder.

>you guys dont know war.
You do realize the US has been to war for like 200 years do you? Not that that is something to be proud of...