Has there been a worse US president than Drumpf?

Ho Chi Minh must be laughing from communist heaven right now.

it's not a wish as there is no chance they will bring it back
from now until the end of time conservative media will rule the airwaves, or until america is destroyed from within

Racheal Maddow and Tucker Carlson being forced BY LAW to be equal cohost on a tv show would be funny as fuck

Ho Chi Minh was based and redpilled, pun intended.

James Buchanan
Warren G. Harding
Jimmy Carter
George W. Bush

>jimmy carter
Yeah what a monster for almost establishing a two state solution in the middle east

Attached: image.jpg (360x360, 36K)

Attached: 1507229253584[1].jpg (1033x679, 41K)

Hussein Obongo

>it's not a wish as there is no chance they will bring it back
The Fairness Doctrine made sense in the 1950s due to how limited electronic media was. There were only two major networks on TV so they had to ensure all sides were represented on news shows.

t. lyndon b johnson

How can you claim he was elected by the people when Hillary literally won more votes than him. You mean he was elected by flyover states with substantially more voting power than relevant states.

tired bait, leaf.

and it doesn't make sense because of the digital age? pls only america has media pundits pass as news

Andrew Johnson was significantly worse than Trump

>You mean he was elected by flyover states with substantially more voting power than relevant states.

Electoral votes are apportioned out by the population of a state though. California has the most at 55.

electoral college superseded popular vote since forever

Bush jr
Reagan
JFK

I'm not denying that but how can you (or whoever this person is) say that the people voted for Trump when Hillary won the popular vote. It makes no sense.

>24.3 million eligible voters in California
>55 electoral votes (441818 eligible voters per electoral vote)
>442,832 eligible voters
>3 electoral votes (147610 eligible voters per electoral vote)

Therefore Wyoming voters have approximately 3 times more power than a Californian voter.

444832 eligible voters in Wyoming***

the alternative option (popular) means that California and New York decide every election

Richard Nixon was the most evil by far. Forget Trump

>thats bad prageru told me so!!

Attached: 1550680296561.jpg (828x898, 118K)

>prageru
literal wank, doesn’t change the fact that 2 states would then have all the control in the elections

Attached: 0F59E740-E340-4590-918E-B698D9E11F7B.jpg (960x960, 79K)

so? being evil doesn't make him the worst

electoral college is the people's vote, representatives are the chosen by the people

there is an elector and all he does is choose who the winner is per his region, hillary won by popular vote but popular vote does not choose the president, different regional votes under the electoral system chooses the winner

there is no stealing of votes here, as the system is set up to be anti-majority rule

electoral vote is the same as the representative districts, the argument about wyoming it needs 3 for a tie breaker, they have one representative

only an utter brainlet would think someone representing the people would speak loud for the people than the brainlet themselves.
your country is a giant cringe compilation and so is canada because american autism seems to penetrate up here.

answer is nixon.

44 of them to be precise

It does for moral people.

>thinking our elections aren't already controlled by two states

Attached: 1524459093626.png (406x438, 57K)

representative democracy works in uk too, and aus and other places, that really isn't the problem

sometimes you have to blame americans too, because trump would only be a fool in other places

what the fuck does that even mean

>there is an elector and all he does is choose who the winner is per his region
Excepting Maine and Nebraska which can have split EV.

The president is supposed to be elected by a majority of the states.

Maddow and Coulter cohosting would be amazing. People would place bets on who'd kill who on-air.

He's the best ever cause he makes everyone hate the US which is ironic considering he's the first one in an eternity who at least outwards opposes the malicious imperialist forces that guide US policy. So people hate him even though he's doing the moral thing. But in any case, more hate for the US is good.

he is anti-big government which includes the military, but it also includes epa and education

Especially when Madcow's head explodes.

Yeah I'm sure everyone would think that the team they support owned the other one le epic style

non-americans can't comprehend how different some of our states our culturally and politically

>implying communists aren't in Hell

Is it our fault you voted for a man who had no experience in governing whatsoever?

Viet Nam're spending a lot of money for this meeting.

Our country voted for a housewife and an action star so who are we to preach lel.

...

All 3rd world countries do this because of vote buying, weak institutions and corruption. Flipland isn't any different
The question is why America did it

Would you rather vote for Hillary?

Yep. Trump is the greater evil here, sure she's unlikable, but I don't even think Hillary is bad. Only Jow Forums thinks that.

hillary is full of shady stuff when she held power, such as the thing with gaddaffi, i am not right politically but i know she is just as ruthless as the worst of them

She's more experienced and more rational than the guy in power right now.

She wanted to bomb Syria in a Libya 2.0 and risk war with Russia with a no-fly zone. That's aside from the sending the country down the drain with the usual neoliberal policies.

High IQ post. Are you American?

Buchanan
Bush (43)
Andrew Johnson
Andrew Jackson

These's nothing wrong with neoliberal policies, if anything Trump's tax law is putting America down the shitter. It's funny how people not support trinkle down, when before 2016 these same people shat on the idea.

Didn't Trump bomb Syria too? Didn't Trump go hard with Russia when it came to Russia in Syria too? Isn't Trump risking war in other places like Korea as well?

t. Volga German

Can't believe I'm agreeing with a leaf but you're right. Hillary is more popular.

Hillary won the popular vote and she would've gotten even more votes if Dems in Cali and NY came out in full force.

Even in the electoral college, Trump barely won the election by 60,000 votes across in 3 states.

more than 70% of the country didn't vote because both candidates were shit.

George Washington

>nothing wrong with neoliberal policies
Kek

>Didn't Trump bomb Syria too?
Not as much as Hillary wanted to (regime change). He bombed some empty airfield as a bare minimum to avoid establishment criticism.

not voting is a "vote" as well stop pushing back responsibility

Golda meir basically ignored warnings about war from spies and information sources because she thought just because we won a war not long ago they won't attack

>to avoid establishment criticism
Haha.

There is nothing wrong with neoliberal policies though, of course not all of them.
Only idiots support trinkle down. Reaganomics was a mistake. Reagan destroyed the US economy until Clinton fixed it.