I support nuclear war

I support nuclear war.
The population of mankind is too much.

Attached: aae37624a27762bb8dcd91dba6ef9884.jpg (1000x875, 42K)

>ugh I just hate humans!

Attached: 1550717351227.png (461x394, 64K)

>I support nuclear war

Attached: 1516895749249s.jpg (221x250, 8K)

>he counts asians as the population of humans
dumb korean

The earth can support twice as many people. Remember demographic pressure contribute to scientific breakthroughs, more people means faster future

>the world is overpopulating!!!

Attached: Lole so funny c.png (410x483, 304K)

Too soon

>The population of mankind is too much.

Attached: 1544796035519.jpg (665x590, 83K)

>brown hands typed this post

yeah, because all those dumb NIGGERS contribute just as much as swedes
they are all professors and researchers, doctors and engineers
I wish whites have just exterminated the lesser races, while they had the chance

It depends.
If everyone lived like an American we couldn't support even our current population.

>another recruit
I bid you well brother, may you shake Korea and her foundations to her knees

Not saying those countries will
I am saying population pressure contributed to technological advancement, ie, think of as a general force to make more money faster

Stop reading race into everything it's literally destroying your ability to think

>the earth could feed 12 billion people if we just distributed the food more equitably

Attached: 15583768992.jpg (219x248, 28K)

I wasn't even arguing that.
I'm saying we could support more if they lived miserable lives.

Well then set a good example and move to a straw hut while shitting on the streets

Me too

yeah. Kill all except russians. das right

>race
now answer this, does Nigeria contribute more to scientific advancement then scandinavia, because they have 10x the population?
or india alone as europe as a whole
>b-b-b-back to Jow Forums
fuck off

This isn’t Jow Forums fren, I left to avoid shit like this.

yet you are a retard, who doesn't have a consistent stance
if cramming people, any quality of people together would be the recipe for greatness, bangladesh would dominate the world
the lives of the people, who fuel the population clock memes are utterly worthless, they contribute nothing

I am not saying those counties will, and I didn't say large population causes new technology.

I said demographics pressure, ie, the need for the system to sustain larger load due to demand

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR HIGH AND.MIGHTY SHIT FUCK IMG TIRES OF YOUR DISRESPECTFUL SORRY EXCUSE OF WASTE OF A HUMAN

>>but it's Jow Forums
You are worse than those Nigerians

But he has a point tho... Your solution for over-population is increasing technological progress. But where exactly will it come from? Western countries are already experiencing secular stagnation due to decline in productivity and lack of innovation.

Wrong person, I’m just tired of dealing with poltards, so please kindly do me a favor and fuck off with your blackpill shit. I’m just here for the banter.

Yes, Korean peninsula looks like right place to start it.

>inceal peasant freak having a hissfit outside of kurva anyátok

hes a neet, a virgin and browner than the avarage mexican, just laugh at him

Sorry but you don't get to bring friends

>need for the system to sustain larger load due to demand
again who exactly is going to deliver that demand? western people are facing demographic decline. Their population growth is heavily reliant on african and asian immigrants. Innovation and productivity in western countries have slowed down considerably

>I said demographics pressure
and you are wrong
the most innovative countries have absolutely no
>demographic pressure
do you think people earn their degrees and pursue their interests in science, because
>demographic pressure exists, and without it there would be no development in stem? That is an absolutely garbage theory. No wonder, you immediately resort to the
>b-b-bback to Jow Forums
since you have nothing to prove your idiotic theory. and the only way to feel intelligent is to create a dumb strawman, like the people, who mock flat-earthers

>t. esztifejű

I’m not even the same guy I just think your retarded.

it's not who, because it's not a policy, it's not a targeted problem that demanded a targeted solution

think of it like this, why do you think germany had the methane cycle or america had the green revolution? was it to make money? there are better ways

population growth outside of structural support causes some things to happen, maybe some very bad things like some unmentioned people here like to imagine, or just some regular breakthrough but with a rather mundane goal

the expansion of corporate farming in america was obviously not directly caused by having "too many people" but it is a solution that came just in time for the rapid movement of demographics post-ww2

the thing about discussing "over" population is that people tend to have the easy way out and think about how nasty it must feel to live in nairobi or some shit, and probably listen to malthus in their head repeating on how the irish are making too many children

those kind of people love to live in fear, it's their identity drug, that's the horse they ride on and they can't get off of it, even though the population in bangladesh or nigeria will never bother them one bit, but the thought of it will drive them up the wall, and it is not the case that overpopulation causes illegal migration by itself, otherwise you would have lots more bangladeshi, poverty lawlessness and crime causes the fear factor in europe

thirdly, talking about overpopulation as a bystander is hypocrisy, if you feel there are too many people you can always kill yourself

as long as people in the developed world are willing to give up some of their quapity of life, sure
the world cant sustain american or european or east asian levels of consumption with 7 billion people
but the proposal of white families having fewer children and the developed world housing migrants and edycating their chipdren sends half that developed world in a fit of rage

>America
>Developed world
If only!

>edycating
>quapity
>chipdren
you've failed me for the last time, right hand

production methods will inevitably improve
it's not a zero sum game, you don't have to sacrifice one thing for another, at least no in terms of comfort

ofc you won't have as many things like million acre parks, one of the strange thing about overpopulation is that it causes people to think about things differently especially common shared spaces, even though it's not every big bangladesh does have a nature reserve

that is the fundamental factor why overpopulation is so scary for some people, it will force them to look at the world differently

Birthrates worldwide are dropping.

I prefer biological means
only plebs go for nuclear

not if those people are brown, and 99% of new babies are

no one will miss wh*tes

I agree, let's start with gooks.

ARE YOU WILLING TO SACRIFICE THE WHOLE OF SOUTH KORE AS CANNON FODDER FOR NUKES?
If so answer and lets make you the first ones to go

Attached: 6e6cdf5fd7a0593b619aec52eaef4686.jpg (415x604, 52K)

>more people is a good thing
a few million is ideal, prove me wrong

Attached: Gun.png (477x487, 260K)

Most of the countries in the world are net calorie importers. All it'd take for global populations to plummet is for global shipping to get compromised.

The rich countries are all either food secure or have navies that can protect shipments of food. The poor countries will simply starve.