I’m reading about us history in border states in the early 1800s...

I’m reading about us history in border states in the early 1800s, and damn there were a lot of BLACKED and BLEACHED going on. Back then there were a lot more white female black(mulatto) male couples than I expected

Attached: 25E1E458-4786-4F0C-9253-B1F219EEF3D8.jpg (470x804, 102K)

If they were emancipated they were slaves, meaning they most likely had a slave (black) mother and white father.

People have always liked mixing. With no previous stigmas towards one another, they'll bang each other like crazy.

Louisiana Creole culture traditionally accepted the idea of men taking a slave girl as a mistress.

Yeah I don’t know why Jow Forums acts as if interracial mixing is some new 21st century globalist/Jewish construct when it’s been around in the US for so long. Jow Forums makes it as if there were zero race mixing before the 60s

>trying to justify his existence in america as a spic born to illegal immigrant parents, he desperately searches through us history to justify his parents being criminals

I’m asian

While race mixing has always happened, there was still a racial hierarchy to it in that wmbf was tolerated (although not necessarily approved by society) but bmwf was absolutely unthinkable.

Genetic studies of meszito populations in Latin America found that nearly everyone had Amerindian DNA on the mother's side while the father's side was extremely rare. Meaning that the Spanish cucked Amerindian men on a mass scale.

>Back then there were a lot more white female black(mulatto) male couples than I expected
Are you looking at *statistics* or *anecdotes*.
Because exactly one of these lets you make a quantitative judgment.

There were some bmwf in early northern states when indentured servitude was still a thing

>Northeast being degenerate
wow no surprise

While male southern white slave owners were making half white half black kids like crazy

>Genetic studies of meszito populations in Latin America found that nearly everyone had Amerindian DNA on the mother's side while the father's side was extremely rare. Meaning that the Spanish cucked Amerindian men on a mass scale.

Latin America had/has a complex racial caste system whereby blacks and Indians were at the bottom, followed by meszitos. Pureblooded Spanish and Portuguese were at the top, although still below Spanish/Portuguese born in Europe. And yes, nearly all white/Indian couples involved a white man and Indian woman, it was very rare and socially scorned for an Indian man to take a white wife.

>The famous diarist Mary Boykin Chestnut, writing of the hypocrisy of the antebellum Southern aristocracy, said "The plantation wives freely talk among each other and know who the fathers of every mulatto child on their neighbor's plantation are, but of the mulatto children on their own plantation it is made to seem as if they appeared by magic."

The frogs were significantly less anal about racial shit than the bongs were

There's the difference. Louisiana Creoles were open about fucking slave women probably because of their French cultural background while the Anglo plantation aristocrats pushed it under the rug and acted like it didn't happen.

Honestly, how mentally ill did slave owners have to be to consider Africans as property and animals but didn't have any problems raping them and having them bear their children at the same time?

What do you expect from Anglos

The French had the idea that Africans could be civilized and made into Frenchmen. Unfortunately, Africans took them up on that bet and now Paris looks like Cameroon.

that is a bit of an oversimplification, free peoples of color also had more prominent roles in society under french rule

That’s why US media and politics always talk about race. The racial dynamics in this country is really fucked up

Being anglo is mental illness itself