WTF THERE ARE NO GOOD COINS IN EXISTANCE WTF

wait until Coinbase and other big exchanges list a cryptonote coine with a professional team that doesn't scare investors with twitter rants

>thinking that monero has a monopoly on privacy

>CTO of Coinbase just blocked the lead developer of Monero on twitter becasuse he is a asshole troll.

Spagni is a figurehead and a github maintainer, not "the lead developer." Monero has no "lead developer." He's a fat faggot but he's usually not wrong about whatever he's talking about. Everything Coinbase has done in the past week could be interpreted as a move to undermine Monero (gee, I wonder why (((Coinbase))) would want to do such a thing?). I don't put any stock behind what their CTO does. He was looking for an opportunity to grandstand as if Coinbase was ever going to TOUCH Monero anyway. What a joke.

>I wouldn't touch Monero if you are looking for a longterm investment.
This is why you will never make it.

It pretty much does though. I wouldnt trust any other privacy coin. Neither does the darknet from what I have heard.

Yea so first on EOS the situation with the validators appears to be a mess. So far I've seen them censor accounts saying "we will explain why at a future date", and I've seen them MISS censoring accounts because one didn't show up to their Skype meeting for a few days. And some jackass was threatening to sue ...

In addition to this the arbitration entities appear to remain a secret with little transparency.

In addition to this my understanding is that ram prices can be jacked up by the validators who receive the payment for it.

I also read an article with Dan wanting to rewrite the constitution to make block producers only responsible for enforcing the interpretation of code. Not theft, or whatever else.

In addition to the above problems there were a multitude of security issues found right before release as there was no formal code review.

And in addition to that - I could never drill down into WHO was producing the code. At one point I went to the github but Dan wound up being the only one I could really put my finger on his background.

The problems introduced by governance (that in itself exists to make a high TPS chain) make the entire thing a no go for me.

There are other issues as well. For instance with tezos I can vote or delegate with a secondary key while my primary ey is stored on my hardware wallet.

I suspect this is why it took so long to get 15% of the vote to begin with.

The time doesn't bother me. It absolutely was amateur hour appointing Gevers but since the Swiss foundation locked the money down and the board has been replaced by God tier developers, led by a community member and complimented by the biggest VC fund (and the project has investments from gemeni and kraken) I feel like we dodged the bullet.

Gevers really did almost kill it.

I watched ethereums PoC releases for a year. Tezos did take forever but stuff like hardware wallet delegation, formal audits by Inria and a smoothly functioning network make me satisfied in the quality.

Is tezos actually working now? Like completely done and released with a mainnet? I havent been following it too closely.

Dumb reason for not going all in on Zilliqa, even without state sharding and small funding they're the best that this market can offer atm


just checked its rank, fucking #28 behind sea of shitcoins, makes me even more bullish..

Attached: VC.jpg (1200x737, 140K)

Who are these God tier developers? I was under the belief that tezos was having a hard time finding competent devs even with their mountain of money.

Also no hard cap sketches me out for tezos as a store of value.

I feel like Tezos is just a Decred style project but born at the height of the ICO and "smart contracts" hype, which is not a good thing.

>unhackable, safe to leave on exchanges

Also means they can lock up your coins without your consent, goy.