How does this art make you feel, Jow Forums?

How does this art make you feel, Jow Forums?

Attached: 20150719231100!Duchamp_-_Nude_Descending_a_Staircase.jpg (1051x1723, 1001K)

Robotic

Better than a Hitler painting.

indifferent

dubs of truth

It makes me hate white people for being cultureless and soulless insects

The artist was French.

Attached: Adolf-Hitler-Church-Oil-Painting.jpg (835x600, 108K)

chinks*

Picasso.

I hate expressionism, they embrace chaos and invoke negative emotions instead of natural and real ones.

Attached: images(2).jpg (203x248, 15K)

Attached: 1280px-Eduard_Gaertner_-_Ansicht_der_Rückfront_der_Häuser_an_der_Schloßfreiheit_-_Google_Art_Proj (1280x752, 185K)

>I hate expressionism, they embrace chaos and invoke negative emotions instead of natural and real ones
well they did live amidst the horrors of WW1
what's post-modernism excuse?

Attached: images.jpg (470x600, 74K)

I can't see a thing. It is supposed to resemble something or is just abstract garbage?

Not fan of Khrushchev, but I just have to cite him: those artists are faggots

filename retard

Hard. Looks like there are 4 people fucking

It's for intellectual kinds who don't need the meaning of an artwork spelled out for them.

I thought it was people dancing

>what's post-modernism excuse?
The destruction of folk culture and the failure of Futurism.

Attached: z.jpg (512x415, 40K)

I have no real problem with surrealism or art distorting reality but cubism is repulsive

The title of the painting is literally written in French on the painting.

Then what's the point of the painting?
Art is meant to transmit a message without using explicit words. This is why modernism and the typical abstract shit "sculpture" with a wall text explaining what it means next to it, is just shitty commercial garbage.

>it has to mean something

Attached: 044038AB-37AF-43A5-AE07-077145EB3D84.jpg (951x972, 104K)

i see

>It is supposed to resemble something?
the Leng

Attached: Capture.png (979x750, 1.33M)

Attached: anguish.jpg (1280x780, 96K)

Don't much care for the people, but the building actually looks pretty nice.

Duchamp's painting put the final nail in the coffin of cubism. It's a really compelling work.

I think a lot of art like this is a vision into a dream world

Attached: sleep.jpg (766x524, 46K)

How does this art make you feel?

Attached: 20190314_134757-1.jpg (1679x2978, 557K)

Mexican art takes abstract to the extreme though you idiot

People on a train. Or at least he made a painting very similar to that.

It should get you the impression of ritmic movement.

>In 1912 ... the idea of describing the movement of a nude coming downstairs while still retaining static visual means to do this, particularly interested me. The fact that I had seen chronophotographs of fencers in action and horse galloping (what we today call stroboscopic photography) gave me the idea for the Nude. It doesn't mean that I copied these photographs. The Futurists were also interested in somewhat the same idea, though I was never a Futurist. And of course the motion picture with its cinematic techniques was developing then too. The whole idea of movement, of speed, was in the air.

Attached: portrait.jpg (1362x2000, 581K)

Mexican art is based

Attached: 1536895381794.jpg (2400x1030, 783K)

>dude random shit lmao

Ugly, fractured, and heavy

Looks better than Jackson Pollock's "art"

Attached: 81xcJrAqviL.jpg (1007x880, 441K)

Pedestrian and two-dimensional.
Not a good painting at all.

It looks good in person

Either that is the biggest orange slice in the world, or everything else is really tiny.

who forced you to say this