You can only post in this thread if you have nukes

You can only post in this thread if you have nukes.

Attached: 9B35F828-B22B-4BDA-A863-942A39973173.jpg (750x579, 345K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=cjAqR1zICA0
youtu.be/CZW4D6R3_t0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 1555835827389.jpg (657x527, 35K)

It’s sad that the pakis have nukes

>India
>subhumans defecating on the streets
>135 nukes

lmao

but muh israel has no nuclear weapons

What are you supposed to even do with 6,850 nukes? 100 nukes are more than enough to scare off any and all potential aggressors.

We will nuke the UK then europe

Attached: 1520542928933.png (690x539, 36K)

indians are conquering silicon valley while all spanish achievements are in history books that no one will read.

I’ve wondered the same thing

>nukes? quite pointless in my opinion

Attached: 1553966609070.jpg (474x1328, 129K)

>canada

and which are your achievements, oh great nation of canada?

>He thinks that lad is Canadian

Attached: 1555360770955.gif (245x280, 1.3M)

i know is apu living on canada.
thank you john

Hello

Strategical or tactical
Think about it two seconds, Russia and Usa are big countries with multiple strategical points including allies
Expect a some nukes to not work as intended, and other that cannot be fired under a certain amount of time.
Btw, people overestimate the effects of nuclear weapons, even all the nuclear arsenal is not a real threat for humankind. There would be fallouts and some effects on atmospherical parameters, but not an apocalypse.

Most of the weapons exist in stockpiles are not operational - they are basically kept in the garage to be rotated in & out.

Nukes arent real. Show me legit proof it is real.

France stronk

Best proof nukes arent real is the cold war. Russia and USA has been secret allies since ww1

>israel
>nukes
Israel doesn't have any nukes.
they've been bluffing the whole time.
Israel relies on the united states' nukes for protection.

Admit it, this thread would've been shit if nukelets wouldn't have posted.

Japanese faced a mega grenade I guess ?

i know china gave em to pakistan but who gave india nukes?

>estimated

Attached: 1499980274579.png (785x757, 15K)

this black dildo can destroy an entire continent

Attached: f5R2WSe.jpg (2000x1339, 130K)

The country with 6,000 nukes is literally famous for people shitting all over the streets to such an extreme degree that they have fucking poop patrols.

Though perhaps this suggests it is no mere coincidence open defecation is such a staple of Silicon Valley.

Excluding of course the 2053 nuclear weapon tests, right?

youtube.com/watch?v=cjAqR1zICA0

One thing that always confused me is why the soviet union needed to have nukes in central america.
If you look at the world map, you can clearly see that the eastern-most point in Russia is basically right next to Alaska, US territory.

don't worry. they only have older iterations of nukes. All other countries save for NK have thermonuclear bombs. Now, unless Trump does a Reagan and allows Pakistan to develop thermonuclear bombs...

Washington DC is an important place, and you're mistaken if you think nukes would go east-west trajectory. It would rather be nort south.

Because they wanted access to hitting our mainland

Don't need them because no one would waste a nuke on an irrelevant country like us.

impressively dumb post

And that you exist under the protection of other nuclear powers.

Shut up Nazi

Dirty and firebombing. Rest is propaganda

You think that nuclear power is a psyop ? Fission fusion etc ?

they cant nuke us right? we're their neighboring country it'll be like nuking themselves and if a nuke affects us it will affect them too right??

Attached: 1517533806078.jpg (322x322, 15K)

That is debatable. If Russia attacked New Zealand with nukes (for whatever reason), would the UK really shoot nukes at Russia? It would mean certain death for you.

If anyone uses nukes at this point it’s pretty much the end of the world

As said by Putin

youtu.be/CZW4D6R3_t0

>would the UK really shoot nukes at Russia? It would mean certain death for you.
Certainly possible - but again, this depends entirely on the scenario.
No. Don't repeat the nuclear winter nonsense.

Ok, I do not have it, but I can have it anytime.

>it is a psychological weapon, not a physical one.
Why cannot it be both?

>Don't repeat the nuclear winter nonsense
Are you implying that a nuclear winter is an impossible scenario or...?

What about Turkey with its NATO nukes?

Nvm.

It is a physical one, but you said that you don't trust in these weapons so debating here is pointless I suppose. Let's take your other claim. I understand where you're going, and again it's not that easy. Have in mind that even in the upper part of the pyramidal scheme of power, they're fighting each other.

>Are you implying that a nuclear winter is an impossible scenario or...?
Nuclear Winter is a hypothesis that has poor scientific basis.

Attached: 1453222464943d.jpg (1024x1024, 544K)

why would they nuke their allies idiot

I have a nuke
A nuke full of love

lolly lolly lolly bomb...

>france
>India
>pakistan
>china

Youre alright