Which country has the most beneficial geography in terms of defending from a military invasion?

america is impossible to invade

You can't have an army that can fight all at once in the icy hellscape of alaska, the scorching heat of the southwest, and the urban close quarters environment of the northeast. Not to mention the sheer size.

USA

we're pretty far away from asia, even the closest asian nation (indonesia) is separated from us by all of australia and the tasman sea

Not our fault the idiot didn't learn from Napoleon and decided to attack Leningrad at winter.

if you exclude their buffer zones, russia is easy to invade

if you had opened your assholes at the beginning they would've forced us into the war and the Russians would've been demolished like they always have

Attached: 1808-1809 Russo-Swedish war.png (1329x1436, 752K)

Large water barriers are the only types of geography that matter.

See:
Japan
Britain
US

Ah, you though you were safe because you were surrounded by oceans and Mexico, but do you really think you could resist the Canadian invasion?

Attached: bang bang.gif (446x384, 46K)

>war of 1812: 1812
>canada is established: 1867
fuck off little piece of chink shit

Why resist a fren?

The North Pole.

>Ever bowing down to the ruskies
Nah. I'd rather have a fight.

Whiter than u, Juan.

ok

Attached: 1547001314405.jpg (2592x1936, 976K)

But why

Idiot

the only correct answer

Funny, you guys did manage to get your white house burned by an invading army.

Island countries tend to fair well against invasions. Especially if there aren't many good beaches or landing points.

Britain fared quite well despite being near the epicenter of two world wars. Japan also fared well against the Chinese, and required some serious ammo from the states.