Can you refute this?

Can you refute this?

Attached: main-qimg-3a7674991e63324076c137dcc50e2ea2.png (602x425, 353K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2flpdqGfAsw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

it occupied the crimea and attacked ukraine, it also invaded georgia not too long ago
so yes russia wants war

We're allowed to have bases where people ask/let us have them.
Fuck off pretending we're not allowed.
Not to mention the majority of US bases only have token forces.

>US bases in former soviet satellite states
It's their own fault for fucking up relations with their neighbours

Countries where Russian soldiers have been stationed don't want them back.
Countries where American soldiers are stationed don't want them to go away.
Think about it.

?

Attached: 800px-American_bases_worldwide.svg.png (800x411, 95K)

lm@Oing at anglo cucks and german lapdogs

The issue is that Russia acts like Nazi Germany, they are imperialistic with the excuse they want to protect Russian minorities in nearby countries. They used this exact casus belli for Crimea.

It isn’t refutable, you have to be clutching at straws. Even Kissinger mister realpolitik believes that the US policy towards Russia has been way too belligerent for little gains.

Kissinger is just a strawman for foreigners that want to curb US ambition, or Americans that want to return to isolationism

In reality the US isn't harsh enough on Russia. We shouldn't have allowed their continued existence after the Cold War

YEAH!
HAHA!!
KILL THEM!!!

Did I say kill?

We should've just sanctioned Russia using the Chechen wars as a pretext and never allowed their economy to recover. Slowly other republics, and such would emerge from Russia, and they'd be reduced to nothing but a city state.

Also what is wrong with going after a country that quite literally was ready to kill your entire population?

It doesn't fucking matter who mimicks the nazis more when the US is still being the US more than 100 years later and nobody seems to care about their disgusting military actions nor the nations they attack.

The hostnation where all those bases are placed can tear the contract and close the base anytime they want (perhaps not Afghanistan/Iraq, but anyone else). If you try that with a Russian base you get crimea'd

>oh no a country is being themselves
At least we haven't put on a facade as being some peace loving nation like the French and British

what kind of beta country lets another build a military base on their land

That map is fake as fuck. NATO has no bases in SEA, and whats weird with NATO existing in a NATO country?

Let's hope the Chinese will treat amerilards the same way in the near future.

Attached: xi_cute_pin.jpg (366x326, 43K)

Letting the US taxdollars pay for your defence is pretty clever tho. Those bases could be overrun by the hostnation in a matter of hours anyway, so its not really a problem anyway

If a country put a base near us we'd nuke them.
We actually have the military capability to fight any country, unlike Russia who can only bitch about stuff to the UN.

You underestimate us

Yeah you just put on a different facade, that of a nation which supposedly doesn't care about its own interests when engaging in wars.

>You underestimate us
Its mainly airbases, wich could be overrun by a mechanized company if needed. Granted, the US military would come back and fuck you up, but the bases isnt well defended since they are located in an allied host nation

bait, but in the small chance it isn’t there is no way you can spin US foreign policy towards Russia in the post cold war as anything but retarded, even more hawkish people would agree. Starting from the assumption that a country is your bitch sets you up for a nasty surprise when the bitch bites.

somebody redpill me on Russia after Putin’s gone

all Russian land.

>after Putin’s gone
No such thing. He will continue to change the constitution so he can sit until he dies.

>the demilitarized zone of Svalbard
>Kazakhstan

You can put a US base in the Kremlin and people in this thread will still lap it up.

>People around Russia want to feel safe from Russia
shocking

\thread
those countries WELCOMED the USA presence bc russzja is a bully

This thread is full of liberashka cuckolds who love their cultural marxist empire of burgers and race mixing.

Wants war is USA

U.S do not have a military base in Brazil, it had it in the time of WW2, but not anymore.
So review your sources, Boludito.

If I got to choose between the US verision of "cultural marxism" and actual marxism id choose burgers too.

The fact that we are better prepared for war than Russia, doesn't mean they aren't the ones looking for trouble.

Would anyone seriously non-ironically fight alongside US if it was attacked by, say, China?

The mainland here doesn't have American bases. The American stuff is located on our own bases.

I'm 100% certain the Dutch government would aid America.

so Putin is the new Tsar?

Aid as in provide Dutch cannonfodder to bolster their ranks?

Why stupid koreans believe in lie american news?

I don’t know anymore. Yes we are a NATO member, but half of the government is pro-Russia, the other half just signed a trade deal with China...

Historically speaking the Netherlands always send troops to aid America. But Dutch people never get sent to places where there is a high risk of casualties.

So chances are we would have a draft. We would send navy ships to protect the American fleet. And soldiers would get sent to some place our government considered fairly safe lol.

Who knows. He has had his throne for 20 years now and it doesnt look like he is stepping down anytime soon

redpill me on Tsar Putin

uuuhmmmm ... No?
Ask the people of Osaka or Krauts about Ramstein air base. Nato bases are only on european soil because we're us vasalls.
COLD WAR IS OVER, AMI GO HOME !
youtube.com/watch?v=2flpdqGfAsw

Best friend you can possibly have. Have made all his friends and acquaitances billionaires.

He has done a lot of good for his nation, at least historically, but his fetisch for weapons comes at the cost of the wellbeeing of the people, and the conventional media (TV, radio, newspapers etc) is pretty restricted these days.

But if you cross him you get btfo like Khodorkovsky.

The weirdest thing about, to me, it is that the majority of the Russians I speak with are fine with that. cause for my outside look doesn't seems that things are that good with him im power to justify his powers ad aeternum.

>I know nothing about geopolitics, the post

russia doesn't want war, they are too weak for that

they want espionage and deceit

>ask/let us have them
>implying

The host nation can close the bases in a matter of days if they want to. It has happened before

North America is rightful Russian clay since its former inhabitants (the injuns) came from Russia.

>Can you refute this?
Russia, China and India make 2900M people

Not if all the politicans are Nato-cucks. You suffer from the delusion that european countries are democratic.

Is Guantánamo the exception ?
Cause I do not see why Cuba would allow U.S to operate in the island.

Cuba.

Attached: 1531280717132.jpg (500x500, 38K)

this but unironically
also true for south america

kissinger did this

We only wanted their US dollars. When they didn't agree to a rent hike. We kicked them out and turned the bases into Special Economic Zones.

Yeah, well places like Cuba, Iraq and Afghanistan is probably the exception. But in all european nations

SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!! I COULD BEAT YOU UP IRL!!!! YOU WOULDN'T DARE TO CROSS ME!!!

??? Why so angry Joseph ???

If you are willingly an US puppet, you can "choose".
If you are not, you can't.
That is the reality.

Meh, France even stepped out of the Nato command structure and nobody gave a shit, I dont doubth that you can close a base if you want

What a dumb post. What a really fucking dumb fucking post.
NATO was created to protect euro cunts from a "possible" Soviet invasion, the Warsaw pact was created in response. The Warsaw pact was dissolved in 1991 with the fall of the Soviet Union, yet NATO didn't dissolve. In fact NATO was supposed not to expend eastward, but it did, and now includes countries that directly border Russia and that, historically, are partners of Russia. If that isn't aggressive, I don't know what is.
Take off your manichean goggles you dumb piece of shit, you aren't the good guys.

We are still an US puppet though.

Thousand times this. Pierre is right.

Every country has the right to defend itself and join their own alliances. The countries next to Russia are also souvereign nations.

>Be occupied by russians for 40 years, and forced to have a shitty communist dictatorship
>Anyone who tries to be even remotly independent gets invaded
>Finnaly break free

>People think its weird that you want to prevent that from happening again

Russia crated this mess, its their fault every EE nation wants to join Nato.