1. Cunt

1. Cunt
2. The most inhuman aspect(s) of your country's history?

>German posters are excused from this thread.

1. Flag.
2a. India Pakistan Partition Violence and Migration Crisis
2b. 1984 Anti Sikh riots
2c. In recent time smaller scale semi organized riots between Hindus and Muslims in Bombay and the state of Gujarat.

Attached: HOMOS.jpg (106x160, 5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Burgos
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Laws
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valladolid_debate
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Allying with a certain Austrian and adopting his crazy ideologies

Dont forget forced sterilisation

why the holocaust of course

1. US
2. Pretty much nothing

Nothing comes to mind.

I can't believe I'm reading something interesting here.

Come home white man

Tell me about anti Sikh riots
Did Jow Forums lie to me about Sikhs being bros?

17th century famine. Grain stocks were full because prices were going up (cold weather destroyed new harvests) while 60% of population starved to death.

1)flag
2) Nothing

Flag
Slave trade

Death Penalty is unholy and violates the sanctity of life

Sikhs are bros. There's no anti sikh sentiment any more. But after Indira Gandhi got assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards (related to a sikh secessionist movement that's pretty much died out now) her followers went apeshit and no pretty much organized a massacre. SikhHindu relations are pretty chilled now.

>>German posters are excused from this thread.

Attached: 1547258780987.png (900x770, 362K)

Partial cooperation of some of our citizens in the holocaust during WWII. Not much else i can think of. Anti-Soviet resistance was pretty brutal, but it's all mostly justified.

It was the other way around, in terms of ideology.

1. aus
2. ending the aboriginal protection act 1869

Attached: Historia de la composicion del cuerpo humano.png (602x904, 887K)

probably actions during the thirty year's war

>italian education

That's the most fucked up one
Fuck indira Gandhi hope she burns in hell

having a scholar discussion about the colonization and giving rights to the indians

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Burgos

>The Indians must be allowed to perform their sacred dances.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Laws

>That there was no motive to enslave them in the future, not by war, nor due to rebellion, nor to ask for a rescue, nor for any reason or in any way.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valladolid_debate

>Held in the Colegio de San Gregorio, in the Spanish city of Valladolid, it was a moral and theological debate about the colonization of the Americas, its justification for the conversion to Catholicism, and more specifically about the relations between the European settlers and the natives of the New World.

Attached: 1365256556329.png (1182x493, 25K)

The Stolen Generations
Aboriginal population was dwindling and the Australian government did not want their population to go 'extinct' so to speak. Sounds pretty based in theory, but basically every Aboriginal child with any semblance of white heritage would be forced to live in Western societies away from their families, often never being able to see them again. If anything, it reduced the pure blood Aboriginal population even further because of how big a gap it left in Indigenous communities, hence the term 'Stolen Generations'

>would be forced to live in Western societies away from their families
The official policy for Aboriginals in the 20th century was that they were taken so whites could adopt them but most of them never got adopted, got given a second class education in the foster ghetto and if you were a girl you had a high chance of being sexually abused. This policy ended only in the 1970's.

This is probably the biggest reason why Aboriginals almost always come from broken homes nowadays.