I used to recommend REQ w/ LINK because I truly believed in the project. Now I say... just LINK, just LINK.
Attn: LINKerz
Lucas Campbell
Ryan King
Link
Nano
Bch
Eth
Sky
Hot
Icx
Req
Iexec
Dero
Xmr
Zrx
Isaac Sanchez
What happened to req and jnt or ambrosus. People used to talk about them but not anymore.
Thomas Gomez
Been wondering this as well. Frankly 90% of crypto projects need widespread adoption before they'll ever be useful. See all exchange, payment, currency coins. Meanwhile the other 10% of projects are going to CAUSE widespread adoption. BTC, ETH, LINK, maybe some of the 3rd gen smart contract platforms, maybe ENG, maybe an asset tokenization project.
There's no reason to be holding tokens that are WAITING for adoption when you can be holding the tokens that will CAUSE adoption. When those moon, you can use some of your millions to scoop up absolute shitcoins like REQ and OMG and NANO (which will all be 1/5 the price in sats as they are today) because they'll finally actually have the ecosystem and userbase they need to start growing and flourishing.
Ryder Thompson
the chadfolio of course
link
eth
xlm
xmr
anything else is subcivilized
Lincoln Campbell
A rough estimate of my holdings:
60% Link
10% Ark
And then have modest amounts of the following:
BAT
XLM
SKY
OMG
NANO
Hoping at least ONE of these projects moons during the next bull run. Preferably Link, obviously.
Aaron Cooper
heard
Elijah Stewart
LIterally the worst shitcoins. Good if you want to learn how to loose money fast.
Kayden Harris
Constellation
Lincoln Scott
>what is risk analysis
You will never gonna make it.