Britain to offer a war crimes amnesty to all soldiers of the past 10 years

actually you can still be prosecuted with strong evidence, so its not a complete get out of jail card

A """""justice""""" that only targets the weaks has no right to call itself that.

>that only targets the weaks
I have no idea what you mean by this. Are you implying that only weak people commit war crimes, or that 'strong' people commit war crimes, but shouldn't be punished for them?

Because they are not brown people.

>Slobodan Praljak, weak, prosecuted
>Americans who fire depleted uranium on civilians, strong, immune from prosecution

This isn't rocket science.

That's Americsns though, they have nothing to do with Brits or anyone else. They have turned murderers, war criminals, and liars, into literal gods that they worship.

americans and brits are both spawns of anglo culture

>how do Westerners have the balls to take the moral high ground on any issue at all?
We don't, we just say we do to cover up our imperialism. The West claims to stand for "freedom and democracy" yet is fine with backing a fundamentalist absolute monarchy in a borderline-genocidal war in Yemen. The West not only tolerates but actively supports human-rights abusing dictatorships if it's in their geopolitical interest to do so. The West has no moral high ground at all. It's all to protect their precious neo-liberal consumer economies and keeping poor countries poor and undeveloped to exploit them for cheap labor and resources.

No they aren't, there are many similarities but Americans aren't Anglo and have been different for a long time. Americans have their own unique culture regarding these things.

not all bulk of american culture and individualist values stem from the WASP hegemony of America

Attached: collectivism vs individualism countries.jpg (1800x1412, 200K)

Wtf why would you do this to your own people???

Attached: 4B529613-8018-4CFA-AB29-81A5D70AF503.jpg (640x978, 303K)

>how do Westerners have the balls to take the moral high ground on any issue at all?
doesn't take much balls, just a lot of hypocrisy and lack of self awareness
let them free the criminals (who they didn't persecute 99% of to begin with)
our justice will be taken by our own hands, we won't be waiting for their "justice" system

That would be one of the similarities, but don't confuse individualism with exceptionalism. All Anglo countries are individualistic, only Americans are hyper-exceptionalistic, CANZUK countries have a case of tall poppy syndrome to one extent or another, America does not.

We were talking about war crimes and human rights in general though, which is why I said they were different "in this regard," in other areas, like individualism, they are more similar.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide
Wtf why would you do this to your own people???

Pakistan did that you brainlet.

Did you even read it?

Attached: 7B13DCC2-C67B-44F4-B0B4-A6F692D65182.gif (477x512, 3.3M)

Aren't they all just muslim Indians? And there's the India-Pakistan partition genocide anyway, so my point still stands.

"Indian" is a nationality, not an ethnic group, just like there are no ethnic Pakistanis. India is made up of a bunch of different cultures that are all Indian by nationality. India did not commit the Bangladesh genocide, Pakistan did. The inter-religious conflict wasn't really a genocide per se as it wasn't one group attempting to destroy another. Both Hindus and Muslims were fighting with each other over religion and just wanted the other out of their territory.

We don't, it's stupid boomers and conservatives and even then their moral stance is rarely more advanced than 'YEAH KILLEM'. I don't know what we're supposed to when only they vote.