Why women thinks they can have babies without semen?

framing the debate as one entirely about reproductive rights is so dishonest and disingenuous. The debate isnt about whether or not a woman should have agency over their body its about the definition of life when it comes to fetuses. You are never going to convince anyone that disagrees with you unless you actually confront the real debate

Attached: 1543283281300.jpg (1024x1013, 54K)

>60 abortions per 100 births
Damn

Nice try Jow Forums

>its about the definition of life when it comes to fetuses.
why are christcucks the only ones that insist on banning abortion

>Jow Forums
Not sure where you got that idea, I simply am trying to advocate for justice for marginalized groups.

I'm an atheist and think abortion is abhorrent ama

they arnt

Im not christian and I don't like the idea of abortion desu

Ive never gone to church, and I think abortion should only be used as a last resort.

i'm agnostic and i think abortion is just the modern form of infanticide (and "wrong")

Attached: 1503542200070.jpg (700x525, 87K)

maybe i should rephrase it. why are christcuck countries the only ones that want to ban abortion

Let's ignore the positive effect abortion has on the economy, gene pool and the very fabric of society itself and ban it to make thots propagate their genetic lineage so there will be more thots and they will be more thotty
incels really need to work on logic

>some dead guy changed his mind once which means thing i don't like = bad
thank you for your valuable input

Attached: hurr.jpg (763x809, 84K)

That's generally what most people prefer, but christians are the only ones that insist on abortion even if it threatens the mother's life.

>lets allow fetuses to be killed because waaah I don't like modern women

have sex

>we should let people kill unborn babies because
muh economy

Attached: 1553040323530.jpg (641x530, 25K)

>abortion is a women's right issue
How can people be this stupid?

Do you support abortion? If not entirely, in what cases, or up to what stages? Likely, your answer has to do with your view on ontology (look it up on Google). Christians view personhood as starting at conception, that's why it's banned in Christian-majority countries, although other countries have banned it too.

Attached: YW4tRKjUhDdfMDUvR00DmUzbjEZxGlYaXDsZFthc-NQ.PN.png (1113x717, 130K)

>lets allow mothers to be killed because waaah I don't like modern women

have sex

the economy matters more than your feelings, snowflake

they arnt. Does only the west exist in your tiny mind?

Attached: _101809543_laws-map_v3-640-nc.png (642x452, 79K)

They're not. Also, there are hardly any Christian countries anymore. And what does that have to do with """reproductive rights"""? Religious people are more likely to oppose abortion because they believe in the existence of souls.

Attached: chartoftheday_13680_the_legal_status_of_abortion_worldwide_n.jpg (960x684, 325K)

these women are pathologically narcissistic and the soyboy enablers are masochists that will agree to anything
the economy matter more than your life too?

>other countries have banned it too.
other countries still allow it if the pregnancy threatens the mothers life. But christian countries like the DOminican rep dont.
although it seems Christians prefer to see this as a moral issue rather than a religious one.

washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/abortion-is-never-medically-necessary

>the economy matter more than your life too?
yes, i'm but an insignificant little spectre

>muh outlier mother gets killed scenario
why dont you throw in rapebabies too since those are the only actual moral cases for abortion. but almost not one against abortion is talking about those cases, they are talking about situations when the mother decides to murder their child simply because it would be inconvenient to have a kid.

Genuinely, why do you care?
Pro-tip: No muh feelings arguments (this includes insisting that something which isn’t a baby is a baby)

Catlicks were a mistake

most of those countries still allow abortion if it threatens the mothers life.
only Christians are Ok with killing mothers to save the fetus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_law#National_laws

More incredible wisdom from a british subject.

A person who can't talk without sounding like Cleverbot shouldn't really think themselves to be sound enough to decide on this matter.

>you can't argue that something that is a baby is a baby
libs are subhuman and should be aborted.

>A genetically distinct being is not part of another animal's body

Cold hard science says the DNA is different. I don't think it should be illegal, but it's clearly morally wrong.

doo most Europeans think like you?, that's some grim shit dawg
i just don't understand the great difference between the dignity of the baby inside the womb with the one that is outside of it

question for pro-abortionist
>at what point in a pregnancy does abortion become immoral?

that's only talking about late term abortions.
mothers undergoing life-saving cancer treatments choose to terminate pregnancies to save their lives.

even in the strictest area in the US (alabama) abortion is still allowed if the pregnancy is a serious risk for the mother. what areas are you talking about where they will be banned in these cases?

>what areas are you talking about where they will be banned in these cases?
the christian paradise of the Dominican
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_Dominican_Republic

upvoted my fellow MAGApede
Ok? It’s fine for you to have personal beliefs, I have no problem with that. I was only addressing the political issue.

if they can anesthetize the fetus, never

It's life, dude, you can't trivialize it

You got your answer.

still more. lol
abortionfacts.com/facts/8

>upvoted my fellow MAGApede
you literally have no argument for why you should be allowed to kill babies?

One is a living being, the other is not
Also contrary to pro-life facebook memes, late-term abortions are illegal almost everywhere and basically never performed unless the mother would die otherwise

Porque podem!

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-59196/How-women-make-babies-men.html
>These could include those from a woman and mean that a child could be conceived without the need for sperm, let alone a father, leading to endless possibilities.

É possível reproduzir sem precisar de meninos… pois é…

Attached: R1AfjzR.jpg (906x906, 196K)

do you feel the same way about infants?

>Religious people are more likely to oppose abortion because they believe in the existence of souls.
thanks for answering honestly.

Nice blog, boomer.

KARA BOGA

>(but the black population is increasing faster than whites.)
*decreasing more slowly than whites

Não poderei abrir agora, poderia colocar um TL;DR?
Acredito que o cromossomo Y se faça necessário

so you're against late term abortions then?

so it's okay to kill someone if I make it painless?

I’m underage lul

this but for opposite reasons

Mulheres são XX e Y nom ser necessárious, e vivemos moito bien sem o tal Y… nom Y nadinha ser necessárious… pois é…

Attached: RALEOjM.jpg (588x726, 101K)

I always forget pro life burgers hate the concept of euthanasia

what arguments do you have other than that it hurts your christian feelings?

They are already illegal and I agree with that generally except for medically necessary reasons
No you’re not grandpa

I, for all, demand for resricted freedom of speech for women

your blogpost still doesn't address the issue. Certain chemo drugs are toxic to the developing fetus, especially in the early stage.
most moms choose to terminate their pregnancy risking their own death.

>fetus is not a living being
Eh?

ok, and?

If the child has a condition that makes his life miserable, yes.
If the death is justificable (euthanasia, capital punshiment), yes. If not, why would you kill someone in the first place?

it seems incredibly trivial to say a fetus isn't human. Children themselves aren't sapient (aka no sense of self or understanding) till like 2-3 years so why should we not be able to kill them until then? They're both in larval states the only difference is independence.

So I can come and kill you without asking if I make it painless?
Except I'm atheist brainlet. What have I said that appeals to christian values as an argument?

>If the child has a condition that makes his life miserable, yes.
Only brainlets who don't understand either side of the debate say this.

How is killing a healthy, unborn child justifiable?

Do I need to inhabit your body to live? Do I have a level of cognition below that of a hamster? If so, go for it.

what constitutes a "late term abortion" to you? like, what's the cut off point, if you don't mind me asking?

>Except I'm atheist brainlet.
why dafuq do you not support abortion then

How does that justify murder if I might ask? Assuming that I voluntarily partook in the act that produces another human living inside my body, what right do I have to decide that that human is unwanted and should be killed?

read the thread perhaps?

Your body, your choice. ;)

We are going in circles, this concerns another person's body.

just tell me perhaps?

I could understand an atheist not opposing it, but why would they actively support it?

ok so
healthy baby one day away from birth is okay to kill
healthy baby right afterbirth not okay to kill?

>KEBRINEA
>EPAOTOLGL
I don't get it

perhaps I don't like the idea of killing babies?

because religious nuts in america are trying to get it banned

No it doesn't.

Yes it does.

a fetus is not a baby, and an abortion is not a killing

when does a fetus become a baby?

so why don't these retards just move out of alabama, it's a fucking union of states, its super easy

why?
Because an unwanted pregnancy is something that could potentially destroy many lives.

when it's born