Quality of Life and Cost of Living Around the World

Based Lisboa. It's so cute and smol compared to the gargantuan soulless abomination that are European capitals.

Attached: 1374322609157.png (520x390, 50K)

Your cities are amazing for 1 kilometer. Maybe expand on it?

Well, better move to Prague. In my (and your) case it would be far better in quality with less expense.
Send thankful letters to Maтвиeнкo
I'd recommend lustrations

PINCHE MESERO MY COLOMBIA IS BETTER YOU HIPPIE

>Lisbon that high

lmao

But i love this chart
Less shitskins will go here

Pls post it in every possible forum

Can someone explain to me how the FUCk german is so cheap? I feel like a king whenever I go there. Everything is dirt poor.

this list is bullshit. How is Vancouver more cheaper to live in than Atlanta?

This chart is strange ? plz gib source OP

this quality of life shit is always a meme, shitty cities like toronto, vancouver, OTTAWA? get placed so high always for some reason, and other trash like soulless nordic cities. this is more like a ranking for LGBT safety

Nvm I found it reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/bslfv2/oc_which_cities_are_the_best_deals_quality_of/eoo2uu3/

Everyone in Europe is poor because government takes 1/2 of your paycheck.

It's very likely to forgot to include rent in cost of living and just look at normal expenses.

Economy of scale, they are exactly like the US in most regards. They also have a culture of large supermarkets with big discounts for big quantities etc.

La route sera longue encore jusqu'à la lune!

Attached: 49125784_p75_master1200.jpg (300x300, 76K)

Should I move to Seattle from Los Angeles?

>Cities
>Quality of life

Lol

also eastern european cities always get placed lower cuz according to this ranking it takes account into university rankings which are a joke, MUH CORRUPT RUSSIANZ governments, "social-cultural environment" (LGBT and diversity), and housing, which i dont know how cities like vancouver stay so high considering every shitty house there costs like 1 mil

>also eastern european cities always get placed lower cuz according
Have you ever been to one? They look pretty on the outside but if you ever travel into a normal living quarters you will quickly notice it's not on par with those in western cities.

I thought vancouver and other canadian cities were expensive as shit due to chinese buying everything? there was some shack posted here for like a million dollars

they dont have smelly streets and drug dealers and homeless on every block begging for money, also much cleaner

They have all of those

>correlating ordinal and ratio scales
The y axis is literally the position of the cities in a ranking. Wtf.

Attached: vomit pepe (rare).jpg (399x388, 24K)

I don't think so.

how bad is seoul if fucking detroit is above it in quality of life

Propaganda chart as usual
>Kyiv above Saint Petersburg
Imagine actually believing it

Attached: l-32757-nope-even-i-dont-want-this-one.jpg (700x606, 30K)

You can use it to show a pattern

Attached: 1554464166909.jpg (303x404, 37K)

That regression line needs to disappear. It's non-negotiable.

>it forgot literally the biggest cost of living
So yeah it’s shit, a fucking shed in Vancouver is a million dollars

autism

so you added another level of autism by adding a random circle above a randomly drawn line.

trendline and standard deviation likely?

>using cost of living and not local putchasing power

He is not wrong tho, those are the cities that offer a high quality of living for little money.

purchasing* fug

Attached: 1531882396728.jpg (1920x1080, 360K)

>Guatemala City
>above Moscow
What kind of massive retard made this chart

The study is made for fictional expats (expatistan), cost of living is correct in this context as this is what the company that is sending you has to compensate for.

but 'high' and 'little' are randomly chosen based on that blue line so one would imply you'd need to be above it. but if you remove it, you can shift that circle to the right or make it large. it is totally subjective.

What is their methodology and how did it put detroit anywhere above last place?

The size of the circle is random, but it is placed correctly, those are the cities with the world highest living standards and below average costs of living compared to the standard they offer. Best value deals, in the regard of a company that has to send employees abroad.

Absolute state of T*l Av*v

Iran pls nuke it

So what does that mean being right on that line? That you get exactly what you 'paid' for ? And the city right below you has it worse for the same price, etc? I don't understand the point other than being distracting. Or the idea is you want to be as higher as possible above? But I'd rather be more to the right and below than to the left and above.

The blue line simply indicates the trend that nicer cities tend to be more expensive to live in. If you divide the graph into quadrants, the upper left is the dreamzone cheap but nice cites, the upper right is the gold-plated nice but expensive cities, the bottom left is unpleasant nasty but cheap cities and the bottom right is the nightmare expensive but crap cities.

what a load of nonsense I would rather live in Nassau than ottawa

give me one good reason why i shouldnt move to vienna

Attached: fucktargs.jpg (620x412, 62K)

The blue line is how high the costs of living are on average compared to the quality of life the respective city is offering. The grey area is the standard deviation, everything within is "normal" or expected deviation from the average. If a city is above the blue and grey lines, it means it offers a comparatively high standard of living compared to the costs, if a city is below the blue and grey, it offers a comparatively low standard for the money it takes to live there.
The whole study was done not for people, but for fictional multinational companies, so they can compare how much living quality a possible location would offer and how much they'd need their employees for in costs of living.

can't afford it

>and how much they'd need to comensate their empfloyees
sry

>fucktargs.jpg
>the fat man prefers writing about generations of targs rather than finishing writing his so called 'magnum opus'

Fuck GURM

Attached: GURRM.jpg (645x729, 124K)

Indeed Vienna offers one of the highest qualities of living for a cost equivalent to that of St. Louis. Tu Felix Austria.

>Seoul is right next to Detroit

Attached: 10xnci.jpg (1024x904, 101K)

Move to czechia like rest of ukraians and russians did.

I was joking

>Auckland above Wellington
>Kiev above Petersburg

Attached: wojackception.jpg (628x534, 75K)

>seoul lower than detroit
yes, that's about right

What's going on in Baghdad

Anything that scores worse than rome in quality of life is a shithole

>São Paulo, lower than Rio de janeiro

Attached: pppppppp.jpg (354x276, 28K)

lyon or milan

the poorer neighbourhoods are pretty bad,

40-50 years of odd war will do that to you.

R*dd*t tier list. Fuck off nonce.

Attached: Rddt.gif (498x461, 144K)