R*ussians BTFO!

r*ussians BTFO!

Attached: quote-give-me-a-japanese-division-armed-with-bamboo-spears-and-i-ll-wipe-out-the-entire-russian-far- (850x400, 52K)

so why they haven't?

Ummm, things changed

Was this before or after Battles of Khalkhyn Gol?

>destroys your million-strong Kwantung Army

lel nothing personal kid

They did

Attached: 2000_073_l.jpg (1268x650, 417K)

Lol, Russia plowed through a million of those shits in like 6 weeks in Manchuria

The japs only surrendered after the ussr decalred war on them
funny that
>The general consensus is that the atomic bomb was a decisive factor in Japan's surrender.
>However, the bombing of Hiroshima could not be really distinguished from earlier bombings by the japanese leaders. Jap leaders did not talk much about it and were mostly concerned about domestic unrest. The war declaration by the USSR set them into panic as their plan was to negotiate a conditional surrender after an attritional war.
>W. Wilson, The Winning Weapon? International security, Vol 31, 2007

Japs did pretend to have surrendered because of the US atomic bomb instead of the soviet invasion to save face, Amerimutts claimed victory because of the atom bomb to look good although the soviet did more in a few days than the US in years to make Japan to surrender.

nice try, weeb

Attached: 1543948469754.jpg (920x716, 234K)

They decisively won the Russo-Japanese War
Definitely not a weeb

>decisively
no

Without USA, Russia wouldn't exist.

The only people that think it was the bombs are Americans and zoomers raised on American media

What?

It was always a one-sided war and Russia fared poorly

so the whole world?

USSR is really the hero of WW2.

>What?
Western part would be annexed by the Third Reich, Russians exterminated.
The same for Eastern Part but by Empire of Japan.

Not yet but increasingly yes

I know you're memeing but it's actually unironically the other way around lol.
The tsar helped the Union during the civil war and Catherine refused to send soldiers to aid the British during independence.

Fuck no.

kys

>Western part would be annexed by the Third Reich, Russians exterminated.
Nice retard logic but the same applies tenfold for the USA and Western Europe if the USSR hadn't defeated Nazi Germany in the East.

Lend Lease didn't really start to come in significant numbers until after the Battle of Stalingrad that decided the war in the East. Learn some history and stop taking mutt propaganda at face value.

This seems pretty bluepilled and strange. The second nuke and the Soviet invasion happened simultaneously, I think it more likely that both these factored heavily on the desicion to surrender

Is this a joke? Is this shitposting?
How was America responsible for the defeat of Germans on the eastern front? The Japs certainly never stood a chance, they were crushed as soon as the Sovietd directed thrir attention into Manchuria.

>How was America responsible for the defeat of Germans on the eastern front?
He's talking about lend lease meme. But he doesn't realize that war was decided by the time lend lease started arriving in significant quantity.

this

>Catherine refused to send soldiers to aid the British during independence.
I missed the part where Russia was a British vassal obliged to support troops. You probably wanted to mention the Russian-backed armed neutrality pact where several European countries agreed to continue trade with the Americans and reserve right to fire back at the British who would dare attack them.

They had already been trying to sue for favourable terms of surrender in Moscow for awhile. When the Soviets refused and instead invaded Manchuria they quickly surrendered to the Americans.

I woukd expect that idiocy from an American flag but not Europe.

>I missed the part where Russia was a British vassal obliged to support troops
It wasn't but they still asked for help.

What the fuck was there for us, though?

How was the war decided at Stalingrad? Everyone thought the war was decided by the Minsk Offensive so maybe the Axis could've pulled it back again if it wasn't for the huge continuous supply line by the Americans which meant they would've had to grind down two industries on the East alone.

It was a losing war for them from the very start. Once they attacked Soviet Union, it wasn't about win or lose, it was about how soon they will lose.
They operated under the assumption that loss of capital would stop Soviets from fighting, just like with France.
Lmao

>Minsk Offensive
I got this wrong, I meant 'Battle of Białystok–Minsk.'

They themselves had jack shit for supplies, they had no fuel, barely any steel and no substantial industry to keep up even with Soviet Union alone. By the end of 1942 they were running on borrowed time

Post that japanese painting of Japanese soldier raping Russian soldier

Stalingrad was the major turning point and changed the direction of the war even if an argument could be made that it occurred later there are a few things to consider things like Americans grossly over-exaggerating the Soviet reliance on lend-lease and the fact that America was not the only country contributing to lend-lease

me on the bottom
uWu

Attached: 0l4p02siujqy.jpg (500x368, 54K)