I mean, look at this. Is this even real?

People like you are proof that Pinochet and Franco were on the right side of History.

Still US presidents are allowed to be posted. And they have actually killed people who didn't deserve to die

Have sex.

>these are the same people who talk about "free speech" and "free internet"

He didn't kill anyone. He just shared a video.

and people are you are on the losing side of history

Attached: 1540830620697.jpg (225x225, 9K)

Julian assange will be murdered, it's because of "people" like you

Oh I misread
>21 months for sharing a video
Yeah that's pretty cucked, nevermind.

>Philip Arps had earlier pleaded guilty to two counts of distributing the video, which was livestreamed on Facebook by a gunman on March 15 as he began killing 51 people at two mosques.

>Christchurch District Court Judge Stephen O’Driscoll said that when questioned about the video, Arps had described it as “awesome” and had shown no empathy toward the victims.

>The judge said Arps had strong and unrepentant views about the Muslim community and had, in effect, committed a hate crime. The judge said Arps had compared himself to Rudolf Hess, a Nazi leader under Adolf Hitler.

>“Your offending glorifies and encourages the mass murder carried out under the pretext of religious and racial hatred,” the judge said.

He did nothing illegal by american standards

*like you

On what fucking grounds
What sort of an absurd law prevents non-profit sharing of videos of a mass shooting that are already publicly available?

Are you having a stroke fatty ? Can't even properly speak your joke of a language ?

is that even real?

I could bet my own life rapists in NZ get less than that

Freedom ain't free

>O’Driscoll said Arps had sent the video to 30 associates. The judge said Arps also asked somebody to insert crosshairs and include a kill count in order to create an internet meme, although there was no evidence he’d shared the meme

Fucking kek

What's the full story? Surely he must have done more than just share the video. Like posting on his facebook about how he loves it and wants to do the same.

Why isn't liveleak banned then?

It's a fucking video you dunce. There is absolutely no proper evidence to suggest that viewing the video will somehow lead to more violence (which is just as ridiculous as the tired old "cawadoody will lead to more violence!!11!"). Nor will censoring the video magically bring the dead back to life. It's literally just censorship for the sake of controlling information, which down the line will invariably lead to the complete death of free speech as we know it (after all, some dimwit in government can just claim that mean words directed towards the ultra-rich tax dodgers is "inciting contempt" or some equally retarded gimmick).

Either prove that the video has a demonstrable effect leading to more violence, or fuck off with your censorship.

see

makes no fucking sense, we're the only ones genuinely defending assange
far leftists are just playing into the liberals game and letting them step all over the social rights they acquired for workers, on the grounds of opposing very poorly defined "hate", and whenever the right tells them that they throw a hissy fit and refuse to listen, well your bad
same shit as during yj, we were ready to work with the far left but you'd rather be weak and alone

>In other cases, at least five other people were also charged with illegally sharing the shooting video. An 18-year-old was jailed in March while the others weren’t kept in custody. The teen is accused of sharing the video and an image of the Al Noor mosque with the words “target acquired.” He is next due to appear in court on July 31.

>The judge said Arps had argued he had a right to distribute the video under the banner of freedom to pursue his political beliefs.

>Arps’ lawyer Anselm Williams told the judge that Arps should not be sent to prison.

>“It’s my submission that this court needs to be very careful to sentence Mr. Arps based on what it is that he has actually done, and what he accepts he has done, not on the basis of the views that he holds,” Williams said.

For the respect of families of the victims I understand why the videos must be removed, but charging a dumb fuck who shared the footage for 21 months of jail ? Man.

based retard

>guys says something I don't like....BAD
>dictators kill thousands and oppress millions...GOOD
epic

>b-but vidya bad! drumpf said so!

i friendly fired at you, my bad, I misinterpreted your greentext.

you think that's ridiculous ?
here, marine le pen is accused of promoting islamic terrorism since she posted isis beheading pics
fucking marine le pen, sued for fucking islamism, what a fucking joke seriously

Attached: Sans titre.png (770x883, 490K)

go back to r*ddit
the fuck are you talking about
“far leftists” aren’t “letting” anyone take away labor rights, they actively oppose the reversal of them

>21 months for a hate crime
>probably will get parole for being a good little bitch
New Zealand needs to do more, these whites deserve no less than a gulag for their heinous crimes against the proud and caring Muslim community

>waaah why can’t I spread literal ISIS propaganda as an extremely public figure waaah fuckin jew clown world

>a white man
Why am I not surprised

>if a non-Muslim posts ISIS terrorism, we won't treat it the same as a Muslim posting ISIS terrorism
Obviously they have to treat all law breaking the same.

He points out the double standard you joke of a turd

>lefties bombing the shit out of pakiswith drones
Good
>Trump solving korean-american crisis
Uuuhgh what a moron

Faggot

I heard his father had a good relations with Saddam Hussein, is it true

If anything, RN is probably the biggest openly zionist party, dumb ameriburger.

>the fuck are you talking about
>“far leftists” aren’t “letting” anyone take away labor rights, they actively oppose the reversal of them
you're not french, you don't know what you're talking about and you have no worker rights in the first place

what happened here is that far leftists voted for macron, then regretted and tried fighting along with the far right, then bailed for no reason and started infighting, then they collapsed and failed the eu elections
fucking morons
not as bad as macronists but a bunch of retards seriously

Context matters, muzzie

if a muslim posts the mosque shooting video saying "look how they want to kill us!!" there is 0 chance he will get sued

Those dictators fought communists who by their very nature stand against freedom.

Proof or baseless conjecture?

I thought they all voted for Melenchon but the other left wing guy split the vote so he lost

just common sense

Obviously they do, except it's not breaking any laws on promoting terrorism if there was no intent to promote terrorism in the first place.

The dictators stood against freedom as well.

i mean in the 2nd round
the "other left wing guy" is barely left wing and the sociology of his voters is more like macron's anyways, i'm pretty sure no hamon voter ever wore a yellow vest, they probably were opposed to it

How can you prove intent unless the person says "hey guys do this more often"

cringe

>baseless conjecture
Congrats you're chimp with no understanding of law

the land of the free i see

Attached: 1561220527558.png (1080x1110, 758K)

[citation needed]

Attached: 1497573935779.jpg (187x269, 11K)

Not him but I'm pretty sure the context always matters for the trial.

newsweek.com/denver-landlord-pay-almost-700000-after-refusing-rent-muslim-men-1414973?

A Denver, Colorado, landlord has agreed to pay three men a total of $675,000 as part of a settlement after she was recorded telling her tenant to find an "American person" to sublet her property instead of a father and son, who were Muslim.
based i will just go to america and try renting a house for 100$ in silicon valley and when they refuse i'll get millions

ok user let's find a muslim and have him post the mosque shooting video on facebook, with a post denouncing racism and islamophobia

i bet you all i have on my bank account nothing will happen to him, you know it's true stop pretending

Why is New Zealand so backwards?

Because of the person saying "hey guys do this more often".
If you can't prove something, you assume innocence.

dont try this on your mother shes a whore

People who promote terrorist propaganda online are probably only a few steps away from committing acts of terror themselves. Fuck him. Hope he gets raped in prison.

Prove it, and prove me wrong. Until then you're just talking out the ass being no different than a mindless chimp guided by emotions

We have to see how the law is worded. In the New Zealand case, the dude was performing a hate crime and in the Le Pen case the law states "[no] sharing violent images that incite terrorism, pornography, or seriously harm human dignity" in both cases the law makes clear that the defendants are in the wrong

this board ends up being Jow Forums-lite all the time.

based

Reported for rape apology.

if we banned all cracKKKas, firsties and their subhuman colonized coons (brazil,mexico,argentina,philippines etc.) then we'd have a nice clean INT board

Kill yourself

He looks like he's never had sex.

Based. Fuck edge lords

enlighten me
here in my country it's common for the media, mainly tv, to air footage of killings and shit like that, although they usually blur the most shocking scenes.
does it happen there?

In 1st world (well except usa) shootings and killing sprees happen so rarely that the answer is: it depends.

We sometimes air the police scene. But never of the act itself.
But with the example in OP, it isn't just a normal mass shooting, it's a racially motivated one, leading to radicalizing people to seek the material out.

man, allowing the government to arrest people for sharing footages or even visiting any website deemed for dangerous would lead to all of us getting screwed over due to posting on Jow Forums I hate Jow Forums, but don't buy into this "greater good" bs politicians make up

I support it, i only come here to troll anyways lol

They would arrest you for merely visiting it all the same, they see all the visitors as right-wing terrorists.

>lalala i can't hear you i'm right you're wrong
no you're just hiding behind legal technicalities and ignoring all context, going "hurr we can't make suppositions because we never know what is going to happen!!!" so fucking dumb
if i push someone off a cliff, you can't arrest me until the person hits the ground, because technically speaking we can't be 100% sure i killed him ? this is what you're saying
you also pretend to know law but you don't know shit, circumstances and context does matter

Who sees everyone as the same? Are you soo insecure that you're creating a boogeyman to protect people who call for the annihilation of lesser races and joke about mass murders?

>no] sharing violent images that incite terrorism,
The "incite terrorism" part is as ambiguous as it gets.
The leader of an anti-immigration party is obviously not inciting islamic terrorism, that's ridiculous. With this logic, should Steven Spielberg get sued for antisemitism ? I mean he shows pretty schocking images of concentration camps in his movies

I'm basing it off of common knowledge. Go see what the online community have to say and see if anyone goes by "n-not everyone is like that though". You think the government is any different than that? I wouldn't be surprised if they label all the users under the same umbrella as Jow Forums.

She's being charged for violent content and the exposure to minors

The difference between the two is one is an event that took place and the other is a representation of a historical event. Apples and oranges

Congrats you're retarded and mad. Way to go chimp you sure showed me

Attached: cheetah.jpg (640x427, 71K)

Do you see the government going around in buses dragging regular anons out of their homes for posting in /v/? The biggest thing that may happen is jailing IRL edgelords or shutting down the site.

Jow Forums on suicide watch. Please don't do any more mass shootings, OK?

DESPITE

You're retarded if you think chileans commies were real communists, they didn't even supported paramilitary action, that's why the ussr cucked them and the reason why the coup succeed.

>this thread

Attached: 1561309522259.jpg (600x432, 118K)

>NOOOOO
>you cant post that

Attached: 1552990247778.png (640x640, 453K)

they have a cuck stamp on their flag after all.

No he's right you're dishonest and going on about technical details that don't matter. There are hundreds of persons on twitter who post violent content in order to denounce it, the worst they get is a -18 warning on their video. You have to be blind to pretend this isn't a political decision. Marine Le Pen sued for islamism, i mean lol everybody thinks this is funny, no one takes it seriously except you.
Next time Donald Trump posts a vid of the gay pride saying it's sick, will he get sued for indecent exposure ?

That would be the best course of action, but I feel like you're giving them too much credit when they've been known to botch up sometimes and not even understand the most basic thing such as what cookies are for, and what they've tried to pull with SOPA and article 13.

>blah blah he right you wrong
>whataboutism
Stay mad that you're wrong and a chimp

Attached: 1535233592937.jpg (640x736, 65K)

If they had guns Jow Forums would have just used it as evidence that they were all terrorists. Also whoever made that is mixing American politics with New Zealand politics and it's fucking weird.

This funnee picture is right, without gun laws one of the sandies could've turned out to be Rambo and save the day!

Yeah... like, what kind of degenerate would save and share videos of such kind... r-right?