UNESCO is biased

UNESCO is biased

Attached: IMG_20190625_100345_340.jpg (1280x553, 143K)

Other urls found in this thread:

whc.unesco.org/en/interactive-map/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Russia
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Jesus the Yanks really are cultureless.

we have more dots than Japan tho you dunce

Did I ever state that Japs had culture?

Too many dots in my country tbqh

Some of them are weird, look at that frozen island in the south of Indian ocean.
whc.unesco.org/en/interactive-map/

Western Europe is definitely over represented.
If the same standards were applied to China, Korea and Japan, they'd be full to the brim of red dots.

Some of these sites are completely worthless desu

Italy is Culture: The Country.

Attached: IMG_20190625_104742.jpg (633x308, 44K)

India would literally be #1 if it was unbiased.

Shitting in the street isn't culture

Unesco doesn't travel around the world to look for cool shits, it's up to local authorities to propose their sites, some countries like China recently push really hard (bribe) to have the most insignificant ruin labelled world heritage, maybe India doesn't care much.

It's not really that it's biased. It's that it's expensive for a country to put its landmarks on it.

True, there are 1000 monuments alone in my state that are better than whatever this is.

Attached: Askia.jpg (530x398, 32K)

>dot in Northern Ireland
Absolutely disgusting
Fuck *lster Sc*ts

That would be the fault of the n*tive *mericans

The way these are counted is weird too. France and Germany have the exact same number but one for France is the Vauban fortifications (which is 12 separate buildings across the country) whereas one for Germany is the border of the Roman Empire (which is LITERALLY FUCKING NOTHING).

0 = 12 just like 13 = 50.

Got drunk on world heritage site last weekend. Fortress of Suomenlinna.

Attached: Helsinki-Suomenlinna-Ilmakuva-Suomenlinna.jpg (1220x800, 149K)

I went to a bunch of Swiss heritage sites and they were pretty shit compared to ones I've been in other countries
Made me think someone got bribed

based

why isn't my hometown a world heritage yet? :^(

Attached: palmanova.jpg (1200x675, 279K)

Oy vey

>3000 year old Native American rock sculpture
>UNESCO:

>50 year old rock in a field in western Europe
>UNESCO: NEW HERITAGE SITE, FUNDING FOR PRESERVATION INCREASED

Pretty much this, have zero native American blood, but even i can see that UNESCO is bullshit

How do we get low iq niggers and inbred muslims to submit more potential UNESCO sites? Maybe that will fix it

It is according to wiki.

year old rock in a field in western Europe
Russians and chinks do that, not us.

>old crumbling buildings are culture

>Russians
Er, no. Chiefly architecture and mountains/lakes/forests.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Russia

Greenland?

According to this map there are 3.

Towards buildings.

Europe has a very large share of the world's oldest architectural works.

European governments also do more to preserve historical landmarks compared to others.

>only dot in the caribbeans

Attached: linm.jpg (474x266, 27K)