Is this what a typical Slovene looks like

Is this what a typical Slovene looks like

Attached: Slavoj-Zizek-57859411a44f817186f2c66c2f28ccfe.jpg (500x500, 143K)

getting his new book, pretty excited
even though he repeats up to 70% of his stuff he is still a joy to read

it's too bad he's mainstream and i can't get kudos for dropping some hegel-acanian lingo and so on

>getting his new book, pretty excited
>even though he repeats up to 70% of his stuff he is still a joy to read
>it's too bad he's mainstream and i can't get kudos for dropping some hegel-acanian lingo and so on

Attached: 1514653620200.jpg (665x800, 157K)

no

i am just trying to sound like the youth, when you get to my age it's difficult to blend in

Go away Petersonfag

I think at some point, the universe is waiting on you a family, this seem more rational in our baryonic realm than trying to blend in a post-cybernetic cynico-autistical cluster fuck, just my opinion.

this chaotic phase is more akin to the freudian unconscious than something nick land fantasize about
these memetic symbols are precisely like the lacanian signifier the indestructible nothing, in my opinion this cluster fuck allows us to transcend the surely bounds of society and reach directly into the face of the human depth

Outdated concepts. Any work before the MRI/brain scans is obsolete. It's interetsing because we have to map the continuum but really, Aristotle and Foucault lacked of informations. I'm not impressed, you will tell me that it wasn't your purpose but we both know the truth.

>le JUSTed by Jordan Peterson face
I wonder if he has already recovered from it.

it's a pure practice in the metaphysical it is only meant to complement the view point of an individual
cognitive disciplines has a different approach in understanding the physical workings of the brain but no matter how detailed you get from these information it doesn't explain the finer details of thoughts and we see ourselves
they are not meant to be compared

zizek only offers a viewpoint for looking at certain things from different perspectives and don't bother much with more hard sciences because in the end we have to fill in the meaning ourselves, there is always a gap between us the "subject" and reality

did you not watch the debate
you should if you really want to be shocked

>and we see ourselves
and how we see ourselves*

>t. person infected by ideology

Sorry I don't have the skill required in english to properly make an answer. And I got to go, anyway I don't think we'd go far from where we are. I'll sum it like that : if we have to stick to older paradigms I'd follow a nietzschean path, rejecting the platonician duality and by the way wiping off a so called metaphysical realm flying somewhere in the etherum. Cosmos follows a hierarchy and the world of thought is inherently material. Have a nice evening and don't bother to much, you can fit here with an awful wojak posting ;)

i haven't shaved in a month and i look distressingly similar to him

yet that is the irony, everything you said is metaphysically consistent but none of it has material basis in cognitive information

in other words you are using the same system of knowledge to reject that exact system, the same reason why it is ironic for the post-cave platonic man to speak in shadows in order to describe the world of the sun to the other cave dwellers, reality has no words, they only come in symbols and are ascribed meaning, we cannot embody the information of the physical

finally an excuse to post this webm

Attached: Slavoj-mampft.webm (480x480, 1.44M)

Gee Slavoj, how come your mother lets you eat TWO wieners?

this is pure jouissance, because as you know *sniffs, as you can see * i only did it because it seemed convenient, that is precisely the castration complex and ironically *sniffs, perhaps absurdly a meta-literal dual castration of the hotdogs

Is he the best philosopher of the 21st century?

he is relatable because his doesn't spit wall of academic junk at you he parses common every day media into a formal system in order to exemplify the esoteric framework

so he is a teacher and a preacher at the same time while being seen as a complete buffoon, so none of his gesticulations are done consciously yet it is because of them that he is most remembered for so he becomes the only notable spokesman for a whole corner of the philosophical and ideo-political corner, i think perhaps it is a bit sad for him as well

clean your room jacques

Certainly not the most mdoern influential philosopher as such title is already taken.

Attached: bkej16c2g0j31.jpg (720x766, 36K)