>A european laughed at me today for living in a two-party state. I agreed with him and told him I wish it was a one-party state under the leadership of President Trump.
A european laughed at me today for living in a two-party state...
Kevin Peterson
Other urls found in this thread:
econfaculty.gmu.edu
twitter.com
Cooper Peterson
>I wish it was a one-party state
BASED
>under the leadership of President Trump.
Cringe
Tyler Ward
>Would I vote for Bernie Sanders as a Trump supporter? As long as he guillotines Jeff Bezos bro.
Lucas Garcia
Unironically, if most rightists read about Marxist philosophy and praxis and not just replies from people who think that are Marxists, they'd realise that they agree more with communists then what they thought
One example is that communists are for guns in the hands of the people and for the death penalty.
Levi Sanders
Nearly everything rightists complain about is a result of capitalism, but they've deluded themselves into believing that it's because capitalism has been hijacked by Da Jooz. They think that if Deus Vulters were in charge capitalism would turn into Don Draper or what the fuck ever.
Jaxson Anderson
they think they're all don drapers who are just held down by women and jews
Lincoln Gonzalez
>power should be distributed among at least 5 parties
Nolan Miller
>sounds good... as long as all of the five parties work under the rule of a King appointed by the Wisdom of God
Justin Davis
Eh, I think the problem is even more basic than that, it’s not just about the nature of capitalism, it is the widening of materialist style thought in traditionally idealist political parties. People are arguing about ideals, but through a fundamentally materialist lense, this leads to a lot of hypocrisy on both sides of the political spectrum. If we go pure Marx, no higher morality than the one we make, a lot of the talking points are moot.
Robert Rivera
This desu. Constitutional/absolutist monarchy is the only true way. Strong centralization outside of the hands of squabbling parties. Tbh it would be great if we could make an AI the monarch.
Isaac Hall
But the point is that everything they complain about--bugmen, degeneracy, immigration--is a result of the market and consumerism taking primacy in American life, but instead of rebelling against the worship of the free market they double down and vote for evangelist libertarians.
Chase Diaz
>why yes, it's possible for 50 parties to be in the parliament
Brody Turner
based
Zachary Baker
death to the state
Eli Green
VIVA CRISTO REY
Charles Brown
>death to the state
Robert Moore
you can go to state-less countries like Nigeria or Somalia if thats your thing
>implying antifa arent socialists and statists
dummy
Samuel Price
Anarchists ARE statists, retard. You should know better than anyone considering such phenomenon took place in Spain.
Noah Butler
no, retard. anarchism is the lack of a state
the fact that dellusional anarcho-syndicalists and anarchocommunists thought that they could abolish private property without a state doesnt make it true anarchism
Landon Anderson
>no I don't think women should have the right to vote, how could you tell?
Christian Fisher
I'll just leave this essay here to btfo your whole worldview
econfaculty.gmu.edu
William Brooks
TLDR
i fucking know that spanish anarchists are not real anarchists
i fucking know that anarchocommunism/anarchosyndicalism is not real anarchism
i fucking know that "libertarian" usually refered to anarchocommunism in Spain
Jace Walker
But you say that as if the market already didn’t have a stupidly large place in people’s life before those modern versions of age old talking points existed. It’s a party of being pro conservative, not necessarily pro-capitalist. This being a idealist standpoint. The likewise can be said for democrates, they are pro-reform, not anti-capitalistic. This is why you see companies with leanings to either side of the line. However, there are elements to both that make their stances more vague and contradictory. Less centralized v/ more centralized. State intervention and individuality. It’s the muddy waters that’s the problem. It’s the conundrum of controlling private power somehow without giving the state the same amount of power to enact that.