Capitalism works tho

Selling children is an ancient practice done by poor families for thousands of years. It's a way for parents unable to support their children to transfer guardianship over to someone they know will be able to feed their kids better than they can.

Champagne and art problems are no joke though.
My friend's sister almost ruined a couple of Picassos and Warhols that way partying in her grandma's NY penthouse

Based. I hope Trump runs on this for his third term after he eliminates social security and medicare.

Attached: trump supporters medicare.jpg (1382x908, 72K)

lol more like a way to for easy child prostitution and enslavement

Most people 1 paycheck from poverty are in that situation because they buy useless shit on credit that they can’t afford

What is the point of your post

What led to that mentality?

>We just got another billion dollars for Israel!!!

>look how cool and disconnected from society I am, heh

Defending the indefensible.

Such as rent/mortgage, basic utilities and food.

They weren't before yet human nature has not changed.

I'm saying that selling children isn't as simple as parents selling their kids out into sexual slavery to some old fucks. Traditionally, kids would've been sold into reputable families as servants and such, but would still enjoy a better life than if they hadn't been sold.

Stop letting this shit consume your life

based desu

Hot

Unless you're some upper class yuppie it IS your life

It is clearly untrue that 42% of Americans are one missed paycheck away from poverty, even by the very generous American definition that mostly catches people who are not poor

Wanting to live better than you can afford, and predatory lenders enabling them to do so
40% of working americans don’t work in jobs where those would be a problem unless they live over their means (eat out often, house too big..)

Live frugally and invest while your immediate family does the same. You will have a dynasty within a generation

cumbrain

prove it

>nu-uh
amazing argument. This is why the right is so popular now.
>dude just live like a monk even though richfags don't that's totally cool
Cuck.

lol nearly all rich people don't do that

Are you rich or just 15 years old?

If you can't succeed (earn a living), you're not worth keeping in the gene pool.

If Americans were forced to live "within their means" wall street would become a slaughterhouse. Those with money know this.

I'm still searching what wrong here.

t. literal tranny working some $9/hr job

>dude just live like a monk even though richfags don't that's totally cool
that's how you fucking do it you retard, if you spend money on useless shit, you're throwing away value.

>Capitalism doesn't work
>Lives in the most capitalist country in South America
>Also the most developed country in the region

ayyyyy

That’s pretty sad

I'm a CHI programmer actually.

Attached: cats454.jpg (1024x768, 120K)

dont people already have to pay for adopting? why not just give the family that gave their kid up some money too

You can't put kids in your sopa jao

it does
plebs are worthless trash

>get rich by spending all your money
Dumbass you will be a permapoor
>lol nearly all rich people don't do that
The first generations who built their family wealth did.
Neither I just hate people walking around and accepting poverty

t. Kaarlo McMoneyston, IV

lol sheltered yuppie

one country is 20 percent fedualist and 80 percent capitalist

lol most rich people look hideous

See The only difference with adoption agencies is that they become a middle-man with more resources to vet/background check adopting parents.

>most rich people look hideous

Attached: 1566618625671.jpg (570x960, 65K)

> political Twitter

Attached: crttiovt66u11.jpg (682x900, 115K)

they hardly lived "frugally". Nearly all of them except one or two had a middle class lifestyle with enough money to send them to Harvard

no, just a pleb who admits he is trash

lol asshurt

The object/concept permanence of an ostrich

Try it instead of accepting poverty. I guarantee you will not be at your current level if you do

>The first generations who built their family wealth did.

yes and they usually had completely different circumstances, either living in more prosperous times or just coming across wealth by luck

it's easy to say "hey, look at the guy that invented hot cheetos, he was a janitor now he's a millionaire" when you don't account for all the people that were born and died broke, the system does not want you to have wealth

The poor are ugly because they can't afford healthy food.
The rich are ugly because they eat expensive shitty food.

it's fucking treyway

If that abomination is anything, it's rich. You're only proving his point.
>bro just like don't accept poverty
>wait wtf i didn't mean for you to pick up rifles against corporates stoppppppp

I am not that poor

>trannies
>rich
no, most of the tankie twitter tranny types are legit working some near minimum wage job as they are either retarded or get some shit degree for lots of debt

>NOOOO YOU CANT JUST EXPECT ME TO LIVE WITHIN MY MEANS, SAVE MONEY, AND NOT GET MY CHIPOTLES AND STARBUCKS EVERY DAY!!! THAT'S FASCISM!

Attached: 1560725511780.webm (960x540, 2.32M)

they are mostly suburbanites

most poor people don't do that. People who are really poor live off from food stamps

I know it's hard to understand for a neet that gets mommy bucks but there's actual people in poverty, not just whiny libtards

is this tekaishi 6ix9ine?

> the faggot

just move to cuba if you dont like capitalism bro

Have you ever seen one of those "what life is like as a single mother on minimum wage" videos made precisely to garner sympathy? They can't make a half decent decision if their life depended on it

Attached: 1556476309346.jpg (500x500, 34K)

ThEy hAvE eDuCaTiOn AnD LuNg CaNcEr VaCcInE

no

Bill Gates and people like him can't even tell you what a banana costs bro.

Attached: 52 56 percent.jpg (623x469, 158K)

Why? Live for yourself and your loved ones

if he was a marine he'd have VA healthcare
literally fake news

The VA is awful. Most vets avoid using it if possible. This was an old meme back in like 2012 in response to the 99% movement. It's not fake.

>The VA is awful. Most vets avoid using it if possible
not true
>It's not fake.
it is

nothing to do with what i said

The VA isn't "health insurance." Also he's a marin and marines are legit retards so I doubt he knew how to navigate bureaucracies properly.

>tf
>tp

Ah yes another perfect day of socialism

Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-20 Venezuelan migrants flood into Ecuador ahead of new visa restrictions.png (899x2385, 1.48M)

how is cuba not a capitalist country when it maintains all of capitalist production? It has private property, markets, profit, wage labor, exchange, and all other symptoms that are associated with capitalist production like overproduction and homelessness.

yes it is

America is literally bankrolling political instability there.

Attached: 9 11 package.jpg (800x1199, 213K)

even if you use the meme definition of socialism Venezuela is still not a socialist country. Majority of Venezuela's economy is privately owned.

If only everyone could be like capitalist Mexico

>government owns the oil company
>which is 99% of Venezuela's economy

every country is capitalist and there is no way to disprove that unless you subscribe to ahistorical conception of what capitalism was

Yes, it makes Americans suffer as all the rest of us.

this is your country after years of capitalism

Attached: 4ba1558a63b1a5ca6b747ed39c849709f6d6c4cfeaf67dd0dbf5eb61ea60b2a5.jpg (500x299, 250K)

Oil isn't everything in Venezuela.

En otra parte de su intervención, Víctor Álvarez afirmó que la economía se ha hecho más capitalista porque el aporte del sector privado al PIB aumentó de 65% en 1999 a 71% hoy, mientras el aporte del Estado bajó de 35% a 29%. Álvarez no toma cuenta que el Estado capta una parte del PIB privado a través del impuesto a la plusvalía (masa de ganancia) y así obtiene tantos ingresos como el sector privado. Los ingresos del gobierno se han multiplicado por 25 desde el año 1999. Que el Estado pierda peso relativo en la producción total con respecto al sector privado no significa que pierda peso en la captación del ingreso monetario. Lo cierto es que el Estado venezolano no ha perdido terreno frente a la propiedad capitalista.

In another part of his speech, Víctor Álvarez affirmed that the economy has become more capitalist because the contribution of the private sector to GDP increased from 65% in 1999 to 71% today, while the State's contribution fell from 35% to 29%. Álvarez does not take into account that the State captures a part of the private GDP through the tax on surplus value (mass of profit) and thus obtains as much income as the private sector. Government revenues have multiplied by 25 since 1999. The fact that the State loses relative weight in total production with respect to the private sector does not mean that it loses weight in the collection of monetary income. The truth is that the Venezuelan State has not lost ground against capitalist property.

t. marine

This is yours.

Attached: us workers live paycheck to paycheck.png (1065x828, 813K)

They have public healthcare and public transportation. They aren't capitalist at all.

that is a shitty definition of capitalism as it ignores how it historically was. Was Roman Empire and the Qing Empire and the USA somehow the same kind of economy because they had public transportation?

I don't care, Ameriglobo

That's minor compared to all the price controls, protectionist measures and stringent regulatory framework they employ. Still capitalist just not laissez faire capitalism.

If you support "free healthcare" as Switzerland does then you are socialist. Same with "free transport" aka public transportation.

Nepotism, ladies and gentlemen.