Why did we let Europe die?

>The world is ours
I am sorry who are you again?

An Anglo-Saxon American representing the west you brown chink

Europe’s fertility rate plummeted due to capital pressures. Labor wages are at the same level today as they were in the 70s, whereas prices on everything have risen. This squeezes the vast majority of the population, who then prioritizes working all the time so they can keep their jobs and not die homeless over having a large family.

I mean there’s an obvious answer to raising the white birthrate again, transition into a global socialist economy with a robust safety net and democratic control over how it’s run.

Even open borders would raise wages and living conditions, and bring a permanent end to outsourcing. We already have open borders for the movement of finances.

The ambassador of the huwhite race.

But we're alive user

>Anglo-Saxon
>American
How many generations already Mr. Mutt?

Right into my cringe folder

Attached: qt.png (838x846, 857K)

Excellent reply. But it’d have been more effective if you repeated everything said word-for-word, but in a whiny voice.

Attached: 1566442773644.png (1087x872, 69K)

I never gave you permission to post pics of me.

That's what the average Bavarian's gonna look like after Turks/Arabs rape them out of existence

Pretty much everything you said is wrong. The fertility rate is low because of women working and not because of capital pressure, real wages have been increasing every year except the mid 2000's and open borders would absolutely not raise wages or living conditions. It would also not bring an end to outsourcing as we still have a minimum wage that's much higher than what they pay in China.

>Amerigoblos started wars in the middle east sending refugees to europe
Most of the rapefugees in europe are not due to America's wars. In france it's mostly blacks, algerians and other africans, in germany it's turks, and in uk it's pakis and poos

Why do you think more women are working?

And no, real wages have not seriously increased since the 70s. The grand total of a 14% wage increase in the US over the past 45 years is easily offset by the massive increase in healthcare, education, and living expenses here. When your living expenses go up over 600%, a 14% increase in wages feels like you’re losing money. I mean it’s extremely well documented that wages decrease with de-unionization. Which is why companies retaliate so enthusiastically against attempts to unionize.

And a main part of Hart-Cellar in 1965 was to decrease employee wages in the US by bringing in low-wage immigrants from the third world, which was a huge disaster. Unionization was too high, and wages kept rising during the period despite a more liberal immigration policy. Which is exactly why companies undertook expensive moves to the third world in the 70s, they weren’t able to reduce wages by bringing more low wage immigrants in so they simply moved to more repressed countries.

I mean if you’re gonna snipe away, don’t lie and make shit up.

>we