Hypothetically, if ETH were to get BTFO, would Chainlink be doomed?
Similarly, if we end up getting all major adoptions and LINK goes to the moon, would ETH follow suit?
In other words, just how much are the destinies of these 2 projects intertwined?
Other urls found in this thread:
cn.hyperledger.org
wired.com
reddit.com
twitter.com
How many times we gotta tell you dumb niggas? Read my lips:
BLOCK
CHAIN
AGNOSTIC
Yeah it doesn't make sense, basically you have to have faith in that link and eth are backed up by silicon valley under the bed and one day they will show up with firecrackers and you will get rich
>AGNOSTIC
Why not ATHEIST?
>Muh whitelabel
All of you that think Chainlink will be used as a (((whitelabel))) are deluded. Why would the financial and technology industries invest funds into a simple json parser and slap a new name on it, when they can have their dev team set one up in under an hour? Chainlink is a failed project. The only thing the Chainlink team did correctly was identify the oracle problem, but their solution is unorthodox and unreliable. If one node goes down, they all go down. Not to mention the flaws that have recently been discovered with GoLang. Chainlink is an insecure, invalidated, and expensive solution to an easy-to-fix problem. Anyone with a background in software development can tell you how easy it would be to create a simple middle ware platform in Java. If a first year CS student can do it, then slave-pay tier Pajeets can do it too. You faggots aren't going to the moon. You're not the crew of Apollo 11. You're the crew of Apollo 13, and you mother fuckers just stirred the tanks.
Holy shit the amount of newfags is getting overwhelming...OP did you even read the whitepaper ONCE?
I think stinky linkies really need to look into what is happening with BCH right now. (btw I am a stinky linky)
CSW and nChain may have built a version of BTC that has a working oracle within it. No need for outside oracles.
Now, forget about CSW and all the drama and consider that if it can be done it will be done. BTC (the real one) could very realistically implement its own oracle thereby rendering LINK worthless.
Eth is gonna be just fine, but it wont see the widespread adoption link will.
>block chain agnostic
sure buddy, if the contract is gone you're broke.
Ewwww